Sexism and red-baiting as the Sun warns of a ‘scarlet sisterhood’ of women leaders

Trevor Kavanagh marries the feminine with the partisan to create a threat to all we hold dear

 

Despite the failure of the Daily Mail’s recent efforts to paint him as a ‘caddish’ love cheat, some corners of the Tory press can’t help but imagine Ed Miliband as a dashing Romeo.

Today the Sun’s cartoonist ‘Brighty’ draws Miliband as a blushing James Bond, with the female leaders of the Scottish National Party, the Greens and Plaid Cymru vying for his attention in their busty red dresses and high heels.This unusually flattering image of the Labour party leader is really an attempt to portray Miliband as a hapless fool at the mercy’s of these Bond-girl femme fatales.

Milibond

The related column by Trevor Kavanagh, ‘Sisterhood politics won’t be ladylike’, lays out the argument behind the picture. Writing about Thursday’s BBC debate, he says:

Usually fierce Nicola Sturgeon looked doe-eyed as she bowed and pounced on Mr Miliband like a spider in sight of her prey.

She was flanked by gurning Green Aussie Natalie Bennett and Welsh socialist Leanne Wood, wearing a lethal smile. […]

Red Ed needs to watch his back. Nicola Sturgeon may wear high heels and a skirt, but the eerie silence from noisy ex-leader Alex Salmond proves she eats her partners alive.

If the sisterhood holds the balance of power, don’t expect politics to be ladylike.”

As you can see, what we have here is a sexualized argument, where the author talks about certain politicians in a way he wouldn’t dream of doing if they were men. I think it’s fair to say that stories about a post-election deal between the Tories and other small parties will not describe Nick Clegg as looking ‘doe-eyed’, or Nigel Farage as a preying mantis who ‘eats his partners alive’.

It’s true some that coalition stories did use terms like ‘marriage’, ‘honeymoon period’, and even ‘renewal of vows’, but this is standard political shorthand, with nothing to compare with ‘Sturgeon may wear high heels and a skirt, but…’.

In this case, the feminine is married with the partisan to create a unique threat to all we hold dear. As Kavanagh writes:

“In less than three weeks, if you believe the polls, this oddball coalition of Trots, socialists, anarchists and, until recently, obscure nationalists could be running Britain.”

I’m not sure who the anarchists or Trotskyists are in this election (he doesn’t specify), but this is little better than the mild red-baiting we’ve had over Miliband’s alleged socialism (or sometimes ‘Marxism’). When coupled with a lazy sexism, they might as well revamp an old Tory poster campaign as: ‘New gender, new danger’.

Resort to these sordid methods betrays a press which is both shaken and stirred.

Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter

18 Responses to “Sexism and red-baiting as the Sun warns of a ‘scarlet sisterhood’ of women leaders”

  1. treborc1

    The SNP are now classed as the socialist party of Scotland, but labour are classed as being middle class the Tories of course upper-class but needs the middle class. labour speaks about the squeezed middle class, but now need disability sick to save them, they cannot pull away from the Tories in the pools I do not think to many sick or disabled will be chasing labour .

    The next election will be interesting to see where the socialist parties end up

  2. TN

    I don’t think Plaid will make much of an impact anyway (and there’s no real enthusiasm for Welsh independence), but notwithstanding the caricatures built up, Sturgeon is a toxic threat to UK politics. The SNP want one thing and that’s independence. In the process trying to shake more money out of England and pander to the interests of extreme left wing pro-independence people.

  3. Leon Wolfeson

    What? The socialists of Scotland are the SSP.

  4. Guest

    Don’t worry, the Tories are trying to ensure Plaid has more support.

    And right wing nationalism is now extreme left in your world. Right.

  5. Rab McLaughlin

    In what way is she “toxic”? Because she is calling for an end to ideological austerity that continues to reward the rich at the expense of the poorest, those people driven into destitution by the current Government, with Labour promising more of the same?

Comments are closed.