The Resolution Foundation’s “Missing Out” report reveals that the share of GDP paid as wages to the bottom half of earners has fallen 25% in the last 30 years.
Matthew Whittaker is a senior economist at the Resolution Foundation
The Resolution Foundation today publishes the latest report to the Commission on Living Standards. The report, Missing Out, (pdf) reveals that the share of GDP paid as wages to the bottom half of earners has fallen by a quarter over the last 30 years.
In 1977, workers in the bottom half of the earnings distribution received £16 of every £100 of value generated in the economy; by 2010, their share had fallen to just £12. By contrast, the share of GDP flowing to the top 10% of earners increased from £12 per £100 of GDP to £14.
As Figure 2 below shows, when bonuses are factored in, these figures are even starker.
If the full extent of bonus payments are included in the calculations the share of GDP going to the top 10% of earners increases from £14 per £100 to £16, while the share of the bottom half reduces from £12 to just £10.
So what explains these trends? The report shows that the growth of the financial sector only tells part of the story. Wage inequality between those at the top and those in the middle has grown across all sectors.
As Figure 15 below shows, the ratio of earnings of the top and middle grew in all sectors between 1999 and 2008.
The sense of public outrage provoked by bankers’ bonuses is justified, but a closer inspection of the figures shows that it’s not just in finance where wage inequality is of concern.
30 Responses to “Share of GDP paid to low earners down 25% in 30 years”
NoBigGovDuh
Share of GDP paid to low earners down 25% in 30 years: http://bit.ly/ngTHdI writes Matthew Whittaker
Ash
It does indeed, thanks Matt.
nowsee
Share of GDP paid to low earners down 25% in 30 years l Matthew Whittaker l Resolution Foundation l Left Foot Forward – http://j.mp/rqbXpq
Leon Wolfson
@3 – Only if you do the RIGHT kind of work. Part-time? No dice.
And I’m sure that government payments are being used to prop up the wages of some, but not all, people at the lower end of the income spectrum. It’s the sort of thing that business loves, really.
That’s why the proposals to slash the minimum wage are such a sham, the companies know that they’ll be able to dump some of their support costs off onto government. And then there’s people who fall through the cracks…
(I was able to live in London, last year, on under “two hours” a week. How? Because the job assumed multiple hours of work actually done per paid hour, and had a *very* high hourly rate. But no tax credits for me!)
Jonathan Davies
RT @leftfootfwd: Share of GDP paid to low earners down 25% in 30 years http://t.co/nb5mv4Y