Syria debate – poisoning the well and dragging into the gutter
The Syria debate shows that since the Iraq War politicians and the public have become less inclined to accept the word of those in authority.
The Syria debate shows that since the Iraq War politicians and the public have become less inclined to accept the word of those in authority.
Welcoming Syrian refugees to Britain would go some way to dissipating the idea that yesterday was all about politicking, rather than the lives of innocent people in a warzone.
For days, weeks, if not months ahead the reasons why David Cameron lost last night’s vote on Syria will be chewed over by everyone from academics to those at the Dog and Duck meeting for a Friday night pint.
As the Labour Party announces this morning that it will not be supporting the government’s motion in the Commons today on their approach to the on-going crisis in Syria, the position of the smaller parties could be vital to deciding the outcome today.
So where do they stand?
If military action against Assad is morally justified then that surely must be the case regardless of whether or not it is ‘legal’.
It is due in part to the Bennite legacy that large parts of the left are failing to see clearly on Syria.
As the drumbeat of military action in Syria grows ever louder, Christians in the country now find themselves between a rock and a hard place.
Reports of chemical attacks in Syria has returned international attention to the ongoing crisis, but there is disagreement over the right international response.
Understandably reluctant to get entangled in foreign adventures after the war in Iraq, Barack Obama’s administration has been so keen to make a break with the past that it has failed over Syria to recognise that inaction often has deadlier consequences than action.
The most read articles on Left Foot Forward this week.