Watch Owen Smith’s barnstorming speech about inequality and his ‘British New Deal’

Left Foot Forward

Labour leader candidate is running as a Left populist - with lots of policy to chew on

 

Owen Smith MP gave a rousing speech yesterday about the blight of inequality as he launched his bid to lead the Labour Party.

Smith gave us lots of policy to chew on, most notably his ‘British New Deal’ – a £200 billion development fund ‘to rebuild physical and social infrastructure’.

Laying out what this means, Smith said:

‘I want new hospitals, I want better roads, I want us to restore Sure Start centres, I want us to make sure we’ve got the rail infrastructure we need, I want us to be certain that every child has a chance to go to college or take an apprenticeship.’

The former shadow Work and Pensions Secretary is clearly running as a Left populist in the style of Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren in the United States. (The idea of a New Deal is itself borrowed from President Roosevelt’s depression-era radicalism.) At one point Smith remarked:

‘We’ve been keeping the banks afloat in this country. It is time we start keeping the people afloat in this country.’

This is manifest in his other policies, such as re-writing Clause IV of Labour’s constitution ‘to put tackling inequality right at the heart of everything we do’.

Smith said:

‘We have a wider gap between the haves and have-nots in this country than any of us have known in our lifetimes. And it is for the Labour Party, our party, to fight to reduce that gap. […]

‘Every Labour policy has to be tested against that benchmark. Is it going to reduce inequalities in wealth, in power, in outcomes and opportunities, or is it not?’

He also trashed Theresa May’s decision to scrap the Department for Energy and Climate Change, and promised to instantly restore the DECC, and make ‘every single department across government’ work towards a ‘low-carbon future’.

On foreign policy, Smith proposed a ‘war powers act’ as a check against the mistakes of the Iraq War, as laid bare in the Chilcot report, with greater oversight by parliament.

(Smith was not an MP in 2003, but says he opposed the Iraq War at the time. He has voted for military action since, in Libya, Iraq and Syria.)

On a more general level, Smith praised current leader Jeremy Corbyn for putting opposition to austerity (cuts to public services) on the table, but said Labour must go further: 

‘It’s not enough to just be anti-austerity. You’ve got to be pro- something. And I am very clear. I am pro-prosperity. I am pro- standing up for working people.’

Billing himself as a ‘radical and credible’ candidate, Smith has also hinted at more radical proposals. When asked after his speech about rail nationalisation, he replied:

And in an interview with Andrew Marr yesterday, in response to the ultimate ‘gotcha’ question for a Lefty – would you raise taxes on the rich? – he said:

‘Yes. One of the things we’ve been far too timid about in the Labour Party for a long time is out taxation system. It isn’t progressive. […]

Certainly I’d go back to a 50p rate tomorrow [for top earners], because I think that is absolutely the right thing to do.

But there are other elements of taxation – why on earth are capital gains being taxed at 20 per cent, when the highest rates of income tax are at 45 per cent?’

In the same interview, Smith hedged his bets on Brexit, keeping open the possibility of campaigning against enacting Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, which would effectively block Britain from leaving the EU.

He also said he favoured replacing Trident as part of a multilateral effort for global disarmament, (rather than the CND’s unilateralist position, which he doesn’t think will work), adding, when asked, that a PM must be willing to use nuclear weapons as a last resort to have a serious deterrent. 

At his launch event, Smith also spoke against any split in the Labour Party, saying:

‘If I’ve got anything to do about it, never on my watch will this party split. […]

Working people in this country cannot afford it to split. We’re the people’s party, never forget it. We are the people’s party.’

Adam Barnett is staff writer for Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter @AdamBarnett13 

See: Owen Smith, Angela Eagle and Jeremy Corbyn – what’s the difference?

No related posts.

20 Responses to “Watch Owen Smith’s barnstorming speech about inequality and his ‘British New Deal’”

  1. MarcD

    Nice try, but this is a Pfizer lobbyist embedded in Progress who wants to privatise the NHS for his paymasters. Believe me NO-ONE is fooled.

  2. Paul watson

    “Never on my watch will this party split……..” Well what are you doing to fulfil this ? Oh only all he can to split the party

  3. Just Cann

    Owen Smith and Angela Eagle have turned on each other about wanting to be labour leader. The division is proof, that the question was never about Corbyns leadership qualities but rather a hunger for power by them and others in the labour party.

    Owen Smith has not spoken against Labour NEC decision to increase from £3 to £25 fee to be paid by people wanting to register to vote in labour leadership election. How does this near 10 fold increase in cost help the low paid to register to vote. Owen Smith has failed his first test on equality.

    Oven Smith did not vote against the Tories Welfare Bill. That was designed to hurt poor people.

    Owen Smith can’t be trusted by labour party members. He resigned from shadow cabinet in a way to cause maximum damage to the labour party by taking part in a drip, drip resignations on the hour every hour that were designed to damage the labour party.

    Owen Smith took part in no confidence vote to damage labour party leader. When Owen Smith voted no confidence in labour party leader Jeremy corby he voted no confidence in majority of labour party members, 60% who voted for Corbyn.

    Owen Smith has not condemned the labour MPs who have repeatedly bullied and harassed the elected leader of the labour party.

  4. Steve Mizzy

    Impressive stuff from Smith who looks and sounds the part. He put out more ideas, sounded genuinely more progressive, more inclusive and credible in his launch than the current leader has managed since he’s been in post.
    He needs to follow it up, but he seems to me to be a very viable alternative to a leader who has shown a disturbing inability to carry out the basic requirements of the role.

  5. James Kemp

    Steve don’t buy the speech writers words look at the man’s voting record. His comments on PFI deals and his close role with drug companies and you will see a bought and paid for politician, not the man of the people rubbish he is spouting. He is yet another Blairite in sheep’s clothing going back to tory lite this is not a labour man! He comments yesterday tell you all he is in favour of austerity…

Comments are closed.