More reasons why Dominic Cummings’ job ad should have all of us worried

No 10 have refused to comment on the job ad - which will see new advisers working in the heart of government.

Dominic Cummings – Johnson’s chief adviser – has caused a stir with a new job ad to work in the heart of government, with the former Vote Leave director called for ‘assorted weirdos’ to join him.

Cummings’ new posting says: “We want to hire some VERY clever young people either straight out of university or recently out with with extreme curiosity and capacity for hard work.”

There are plenty of issues with the rambling post. Requesting applicants from a certain age group is almost certainly age discrimination. The government’s own guidance says: “You must not imply in a job advert that you will discriminate against anyone.”

It is also in breach of civil service guidance. Amusingly, the civil service’s own recruitment strategy document claims “age is just a number.”

The civil service management code is very clear: In recruitment, “there must be no unfair discrimination on the basis of age” or other protected characteristics. Cummings could not, for example, say he was looking for “VERY clever white people”. Obviously.

But here’s the thing: it’s not clear if this is an official civil service job. With No 10 refusing to comment on the record when asked by Left Foot Forward, we don’t know yet. Applications are being sent to a private gmail account – not a government email. Advertising solely on his own personal blog. Cummings is clear that these hires will be working ‘in Downing Street with the best officials, some as spads and perhaps some as officials.’ So how is he seemingly able to flout almost every hiring policy in the book?

Whether they become official civil service jobs or not, comments in job ads favouring a certain age group are ‘likely to be discriminatory’ according to ACAS’ own advice (they are a key regulator in employment law).

The official civil service advice on the conduct of Special Advisers – of which Cummings is one – is pretty clear: they cannot directly hire civil servants. So these would appear to be ‘private’ political hires. In which case, there will be even less transparency over these appointments than usual.

Let’s take another issue with the job ad. Previous government commissioned the Taylor Review to tackle workplace exploitation. Though weak, it was consistent in seeking to tackle ‘one sided flexibility’ in employment: where people could be taken on and sacked at the drop of a hat. Cummings seems to be throwing that out of the window, writing: “I will bin you within weeks if you don’t fit.”

It’s an insight into the mindset of the man whispering into Johnson’s ear. A figure in employment law tells me – worryingly – that we’re yet to see what the new government does with working practice policies, and whether they continue on the same path as May, which did see some gains in employment rights.

The alarm bells aren’t just ringing, they are deafening.

Josiah Mortimer is Editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter.

Like this article? Left Foot Forward relies on support from readers to sustain our progressive journalism. Can you become a supporter for £5 a month?

8 Responses to “More reasons why Dominic Cummings’ job ad should have all of us worried”

  1. nhsgp

    So people who go to university late in life. Your going to discriminate against them

    This about diversity. It’s about getting people who don’t get a look in to the civil service.

    It’s positive discrimination, and you must be in favour of that

  2. Michael McManus

    How does an employee – unelected and for work that has not been in any manifesto or even openly discussed – have the power to specify personal profiles in such specific and eccentric detail one wonders.
    Open, transparent government?

  3. Alice Aforethought

    Only the 3rd of January and already we have bellend of the year.

    Change is coming Josiah. Diversity of thought is coming Josiah. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

  4. Barry Edwards

    Is this for real or a Crosby/Cummings dead cat?

  5. Alan Bond

    Not in the least surprised by this. He is the power behind the throne, so to speak, as he represents all the malevolent interests in this country. He is an extremely dangerous man and he has bojo the bozo in his pocket. He ned to be exposed for the charlatan that he is.

  6. Tom Sacold

    I read the complete blog post and I thought it rather refreshing in a strange way. I like his emphasis on technical ability and hard work.

  7. Patrick Newman

    Tom, you are an incompetent liar!

  8. Dave Roberts

    Patrick Newman is really the guy who used to run Socialist Unity. Andy Newman was a complete Trot failure from Wiltshire. I think it’s the same person.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.