The Tory press hopes to shove the Labour party to the Right
Not content with telling people how to vote in the election, the Tory press is now looking to ensure the Labour party chooses a candidate it likes.
Thus we’ve seen positive coverage of so-called Blairite contenders such as Liz Kendall and Chuka Umunna (who has dropped out of the race and endorsed Kendall) and hostile coverage of the supposedly ‘Left’ contenders such as Andy Burnham.
The Times and the Telegraph ran cheerful profiles about the ‘refreshing’ Ms Kendall. Even the Sun gave the ‘bold’ MP for Leicester the sort of warm coverage usually reserved for the Conservatives, as she ‘trashed most of Ed Miliband’s policies’ and backed free schools and more defence spending.
Meanwhile, shadow health secretary Andy Burnham, who has secured the backing of more Labour MPs, is bloodied in the familiar style of the general election coverage.
Today’s Sun is an exaggerated form of the general trope:
“Andy Burnham today makes a desperate bid to prove he is not a union puppet.”
That’s not from an editorial column. It’s the first line of a news story.
Despite the facts being much the same – criticism of Ed Miliband and Labour’s past, pro-business talk – the contrast with the Kendall coverage is striking. The paper pulls Burnham apart for ‘aiming to woo business’ after ‘speculation Mr Burnham is Unite union chief Len McCluskey‘s choice as leader’.
The Sun says column lays it out:
“The hasty U-turn by top Labour MPs since their election disaster is jaw-dropping.
Who knows now what Andy Burnham actually stands for? One minute he’s Ed Miliband’s class-war henchman. The next he claims ‘the entrepreneur will be as much our hero as the nurse’ and admits Labour DID spend too much.
Pull the other one. And let’s see him say it to Red Len McCluskey’s face.”
(The U-turn point is interesting. If MPs had stuck to their previous positions, the same papers would be saying they are ignoring the verdict of the electorate, and had learned nothing from past mistakes.)
The piece goes on to praise Caroline Flint, who is running for deputy leader:
“Caroline Flint was another Miliband front-bencher. But there’s a difference between her and Burnham when she says she wants to appeal to Sun readers. She sounds genuine.”
What has Caroline Flint done to please the Sun? Under the Burnham news story, a piece on Ms Flint begins:
“Labour needs to start attacking benefits scroungers as much as bankers if it wants to regain power, says shadow energy secretary Caroline Flint.
The party’s deputy-leader hopeful said it must speak to Sun readers and aspirational voters once more.
She added the party should be comfortable giving a ‘kick up the backside’ to those choosing to live on benefits.”
Note the contrast here. Flint is praised for sounding ‘genuinely’ more conservative than Burnham.
Meanwhile, I’ve not seen any coverage of another ‘deputy leader hopeful’: the high profile Walthamstow MP Stella Creasy, who received an increased majority on a joint Labour and Co-operative Party ticket in the general election.
Ms Creasy is thought to be on the Left of the party, and is probably best known for taking on payday loan scammers Wonga.
She ‘sounds genuine’ too, though I won’t hold my breath about Sun coverage.
Because what we see is the right-wing press hoping to move the Labour party to the right, and influence the terms not just of the leadership election debate but of future general elections.
Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter
Read more:
The Sun wants to scrap the Human Rights Act…after using it to defend its reporters
Daily Mail says Syrian refugees turn Greek holiday town into ‘disgusting hellhole’
62 Responses to “Never mind the unions. What about the Sun’s influence on the Labour leadership contest?”
Labouring Life
I don’t get this article, everything the Sun says about Burnham is rubbish, but everything they say about Kendall is true. Cant you see what they have already done…divide. Both Liz Kendall and Andy Burnham have good ideas and bad ones. This left right stuff is crap and must go. Either we are an alliance of middle and working classs, left and right or we will continue to lose and lose.
Because Kendall is more inclusive is more about the alliance she is right, but Burnham close to the last 3 leaders and once seen as right is now on the left. At least Kendall once had a proper job.
One of the questions that must be asked is once you have raised peoples living standards, given them a free universal education, allowed them to rise a bit, who are they. Who am I. if I came from a poor background, managed to finally complete Uni as a mature student (first in my family) been long term unemployed, but now a Chief Exec of a non profit/charity. Where do I fit. Just take my vote and shut up or am i allowed a say.
I aspired and Labour policy allowed this. Labour policy gave me a great education, it saved my life, through the NHS as child when I was hit by a car coming out of school, It allowed me to get a degree and be given a grant to do it when i was 30. So I aspired and I still aspire, not just for myself but everyone fight to make ends meet below the breadline. I aspire to live in a country where justice & politics, health & welfare, housing & social care are not pawns in a game played by the rich or the invincibly ignorant which ever political party they belong to
Kryten2k35
Labour is in deep shit. None of them are fit to lead the country. I liked Ed, but he let the Murdoch Empire trash him senseless.
James Chilton
That the Sun is supposed to have any influence whatever on British politics says it all really.
Keith M
Labour needs to discover it’s real roots and stand up for social justice and decency. We are still suffering from the Blair legacy – a vote for Kendall is a vote for pink Toryism.
Keith M
Stuff the sun – wouldn’t wipe my arse with it.