Never mind the unions. What about the Sun’s influence on the Labour leadership contest?

The Tory press hopes to shove the Labour party to the Right

 

Not content with telling people how to vote in the election, the Tory press is now looking to ensure the Labour party chooses a candidate it likes.

Thus we’ve seen positive coverage of so-called Blairite contenders such as Liz Kendall and Chuka Umunna (who has dropped out of the race and endorsed Kendall) and hostile coverage of the supposedly ‘Left’ contenders such as Andy Burnham.

The Times and the Telegraph ran cheerful profiles about the ‘refreshing’ Ms Kendall. Even the Sun gave the ‘bold’ MP for Leicester the sort of warm coverage usually reserved for the Conservatives, as she ‘trashed most of Ed Miliband’s policies’ and backed free schools and more defence spending.

Kendall Sun 29 May

Meanwhile, shadow health secretary Andy Burnham, who has secured the backing of more Labour MPs, is bloodied in the familiar style of the general election coverage.

Today’s Sun is an exaggerated form of the general trope:

“Andy Burnham today makes a desperate bid to prove he is not a union puppet.”

That’s not from an editorial column. It’s the first line of a news story.

Burnham Sun 29 May

Despite the facts being much the same – criticism of Ed Miliband and Labour’s past, pro-business talk – the contrast with the Kendall coverage is striking. The paper pulls Burnham apart for ‘aiming to woo business’ after ‘speculation Mr Burnham is Unite union chief Len McCluskey‘s choice as leader’.

The Sun says column lays it out:

“The hasty U-turn by top Labour MPs since their election disaster is jaw-dropping.

Who knows now what Andy Burnham actually stands for? One minute he’s Ed Miliband’s class-war henchman. The next he claims ‘the entrepreneur will be as much our hero as the nurse’ and admits Labour DID spend too much.

Pull the other one. And let’s see him say it to Red Len McCluskey’s face.”

(The U-turn point is interesting. If MPs had stuck to their previous positions, the same papers would be saying they are ignoring the verdict of the electorate, and had learned nothing from past mistakes.)

The piece goes on to praise Caroline Flint, who is running for deputy leader:

“Caroline Flint was another Miliband front-bencher. But there’s a difference between her and Burnham when she says she wants to appeal to Sun readers. She sounds genuine.”

Flint Sun May 29

What has Caroline Flint done to please the Sun? Under the Burnham news story, a piece on Ms Flint begins:

“Labour needs to start attacking benefits scroungers as much as bankers if it wants to regain power, says shadow energy secretary Caroline Flint.

The party’s deputy-leader hopeful said it must speak to Sun readers and aspirational voters once more.

She added the party should be comfortable giving a ‘kick up the backside’ to those choosing to live on benefits.”

Note the contrast here. Flint is praised for sounding ‘genuinely’ more conservative than Burnham.

Meanwhile, I’ve not seen any coverage of another ‘deputy leader hopeful’: the high profile Walthamstow MP Stella Creasy, who received an increased majority on a joint Labour and Co-operative Party ticket in the general election.

stella-creasy

Ms Creasy is thought to be on the Left of the party, and is probably best known for taking on payday loan scammers Wonga.

She ‘sounds genuine’ too, though I won’t hold my breath about Sun coverage.

Because what we see is the right-wing press hoping to move the Labour party to the right, and influence the terms not just of the leadership election debate but of future general elections.

Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter

Read more: 

The Sun wants to scrap the Human Rights Act…after using it to defend its reporters

Daily Mail says Syrian refugees turn Greek holiday town into ‘disgusting hellhole’

Sign up for our weekly email by clicking here.

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today. 

62 Responses to “Never mind the unions. What about the Sun’s influence on the Labour leadership contest?”

  1. WhiteVanMan

    Even the Independent,backed the Toeies last month
    By your standard
    The guardian backed the libdems in 2010
    Endorsed and Miliband to be their choice for leader in the Sptember 2010 leadership, election
    Backed labour in 2015′ and labour lost, so should labour listen to the guardian,if they backed Andy?

  2. WhiteVanMan

    Blue labour?

  3. WhiteVanMan

    Lose the 2020 election?

  4. WhiteVanMan

    To stop the Tories wining on a even more right wing manifesto?

  5. WhiteVanMan

    Liz is offering new ideas,she offered alternatives when Ed, ran it,and she disagreed with him.

  6. WhiteVanMan

    What if the mail has something sensible to say Stephen Lawrence, the sun hostility to endless immigration driving wages down?

  7. WhiteVanMan

    Prejudice

  8. Mike B

    Yes The Independent decided to follow the interests of its owner and the Guardian made a fool of itself in 2010 (despite the disapproval of many of the staff I understand) but Labour members are perfectly at liberty to look media outlets and decide if each individually has the real interests of the population and the Labour party at heart or whether they are backing narrow sectional interests. If a paper such as for example The Evening Standard tells Londoners to vote Conservative then Labour supporting Londoners can discount its opinions on who Labour should select as its Mayoral candidate. The Tories have a pretty firm lock on about 80 percent of the press so allow Labour people at least control of our own debate. This is not a one party state (yet).

  9. Patrick Lilley

    I think you have answered your own question: we need to help those below the breadline – but how? Raising wages so that the benefits bill is reduced. We will see soon enough the way the Conservatives will treat workers. Labour renewed can help people better their own health; we can empowe people to care for their homes, streets and neighbours at a local lever? To share our good fortune with others locally and further afrield. That means cooperative action locally, regionally, nationally and internationally. This is neither done by top down instructions or by the free for all of the market though there will be times and places when each system delivers and when each system fails. But there are some things that are better done locally. So a diverse approach makes more sense.

  10. Patrick Lilley

    I think you have answered your own question: we need to help those below the breadline – but how? Raising wages so that the benefits bill is reduced. We will see soon enough the way the Conservatives will treat workers. Labour renewed can help people better their own health; we can empowe people to care for their homes, streets and neighbours at a local lever? To share our good fortune with others locally and further afrield. That means cooperative action locally, regionally, nationally and internationally. This is neither done by top down instructions or by the free for all of the market though there will be times and places when each system delivers and when each system fails. But there are some things that are better done locally. So a diverse approach makes more sense.

  11. Keith M

    Why no mention of Jeremy Corbyns interest – only paper I’ve seen this in is The mMorning Star.

Leave a Reply