Our ageing population needs young, tax-paying migrants

We need to pair migrants with particular skills to areas with labour shortages



Britain’s population is growing. New estimates out this week reveal a 0.77 per cent population increase across the UK at the mid-point of 2014, higher than the 10-year average.

The rise is down to both a higher number of births than deaths (accounting for 46 per cent of the increase) and positive net migration (accounting for 53 per cent).

Britain benefits from migration – not least because migrants support our ageing society by helping to grow the economy, reduce the deficit and finance public services.

But significant numbers are concerned that the country is overcrowded. Indeed, Britain has one of the highest population densities in Europe.

And though the latest increase is not only down to a rise in inward migration, it is clear that net migration is having a sustained impact on population levels.

Still, Britain can cope with the current increase: the OBR has said that urban Britain ‘occupies less than 10 per cent of the surface area’ and density is relatively low by historical standards.

There is enough space for more houses if we are prepared to build them: building enough homes to accommodate the expected increase in people would mean that 12 or 13 per cent of land in England – rather than around 10 per cent- would be developed.

Population growth will of course be felt in some parts of the country, but it will not be felt everywhere. Breaking down the data reveals a much more mixed picture than the aggregate figures suggest.

In parts of Wales and Northern England – such as Cumbria and North Yorkshire – population levels are falling due to relatively low birth rates and low or negative levels of net migration (both international and internal).

On the other hand, parts of the South East and the Midlands have recently experienced very high levels of population growth. Tower Hamlets, Newham, Hackney, Islington and Corby are the five local authorities that have had the greatest growth over the past ten years.

In other areas – such as Manchester and Birmingham – population levels appear relatively stable but this masks considerable churn.

The latest figures also highlight Britain’s ageing population. There has been a rise in the median age to 40 – a jump of more than 6 years since 1974.

But again the impacts of ageing are uneven across the country. In areas with growing populations like Slough, Hackney and Tower Hamlets, the median age is far lower than average, while coastal areas tend to have greater numbers of older people.

The key challenge is therefore not that there are too many people in the UK, but that there are considerable imbalances across the country.

In some places local authorities are dealing with sustained pressure on public services; in others, they are struggling to retain skilled workers.

In order to address these imbalances, we need to do two things. First, local authorities facing high levels of flux and churn need greater support in easing pressures on public services.

Before the election, the Conservatives promised they would introduce a new Migration Control Fund for local authorities. This fund should target support services and address needs in particular areas where inward migration is creating pressures.

Second, local authorities with declining or stagnating populations would benefit from a better pairing of migrants arriving with particular skills to areas with labour shortages.

Germany’s shrinking population has incentivised localities to develop creative ways to utilise migration in order to boost their economies – with different cities competing for migrant labour through advertising, better international transport links, and targeted integration policies aiming to get migrants settled into work (such as guidance given to newcomers for setting up new businesses).

Asylum seekers, many of whom arrive highly-qualified, are also being dispersed to areas with high labour demand.

In the US, cities with declining populations such as Pittsburgh and Cleveland have come up with new strategies for attracting migrants to revitalise their economies – from targeting migrant community groups with job advertisements to producing webinars to support employers with visa administration for international students.

Local authorities suffering from demographic and economic decline could draw on some of these strategies to ensure migrants fill labour gaps, in order to both facilitate local economic growth and alleviate pressures in other parts of Britain.

These steps would go some way to addressing local imbalances and helping to ease public concerns. On the other hand, it would be a mistake to think that reducing net migration dramatically would seriously tackle population worries.

Instead, it would risk accelerating population ageing and, in some areas, adding to population decline– which would amount to a much greater demographic challenge.

Marley Morris is a researcher at IPPR. Follow him on Twitter

17 Responses to “Our ageing population needs young, tax-paying migrants”

  1. stevep

    Good article. A level-headed, balanced look at the benefits or otherwise of migration is needed to counteract the Daily SunMail hysterics. Propagandising and frightening the electorate for political gain doesn`t help the debate. Or Britain.

  2. Paul 保羅 باول Billanie

    Erm what about the young and unemployed we already have?

    I am not saying we shouldn’t allow immigration but we have to be sensible about it!

    You say in the article ‘migrants support our ageing society by helping to grow the economy, reduce the deficit and finance public services.’

    But then if the jobs went to a british young/unemployed person then it would be them doing exactly the same thing and more as well. If it went to a British citizen, they would also be reducing the unemployment figure and reducing the welfare bill as well as they no longer need to claim housing and council tax benefits or JSA/ESA or other out of work benefits. Or at least not as much as they currently are.

    But nobody thinks of getting our unemployed struggling to find work into these roles. Instead leave them to struggle to find work and then sanction them when they can’t get a job or fall foul for some other reason to the more and more ludicrous sanctions regime.

  3. swat

    Why should migrants be forced do these jobs; what’s wrong with the British unemployed people drawing benefit, not doing these in many cases low skilled jobs. Give them the option, take these caring jobs or lose their benefits.

  4. Rowdie111

    “Britain needs young tax-paying immigrants “….why? ….because they will vote for Labour?

  5. JohnRich

    We need young tax paying Brits, not immigrants who force down wages.

  6. peterberg

    Wow, what a tonne of liberal bs. Gee another 500,000 with the same amount of schools, doctors, hospitals and housing (if we can stop ourselves from building entirely over our countryside for these migrants), what could go wrong?

    Wondering why the NHS is crippled right now? its because there are too many people in the country idiots. Wake the hell up, this dumbass liberal utopian vision will be the end of this country.

  7. peter

    Apparently these figures are lies and the population is actually closer to 90 million. Seven years ago we reached 77 million. These figures are lies, do not believe this nonsense.

  8. dimux

    Your first choice leftfootforward Find Here

  9. jemran

    Your “10% of the surface area” figure is nonsense. It is not the actual physical space required that is the limiting factor, it is the ability of the land mass to provide for the people on it. If the UK had to provide for itself from its own resources, it could support a population of no more than 20 million: 46 million short of the current population. The shortfall is made up by taking resources from other parts of the planet at the expense of the ecosystems, wildlife and people there. If you’re worried about maximising health and happiness of the greatestnumber of people, campaign to reduce the UK population until it is sustainable and stops stealing from the rest of the world.


    We do not need migrants. We have a huge population on a little island. If we need migrants then the education system has failed. Or maybe the working classes are a tad thick.

  11. tirevaro


  12. treborc

    make the elderly work until they die. I’m sure somebody in labour will come up with it.

  13. MelvinRLatham

    Your first choice leftfootforward Find Here


  14. Iain Fletcher

    What happens when they become old, pension drawing immigrants? Do we then need even more young immigrants?

    I’d rather we got the people we’ve got properly employed through training and skills first thanks. I’m a bit tired of seeing my friends unable to work in warehouses or as security because they are undercut by people living 10 to a house.

  15. Iain Fletcher

    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

  16. madasafish

    SO we can’t build enough houses for our current population but convecerns about more immigration chasing a limited supply are met by :

    “There is enough space for more houses if we are prepared to build them: building enough homes to accommodate the expected increase in people would mean that 12 or 13 per cent of land in England – rather than around 10 per cent- would be developed.”

    I really think this is a pathetic response to what for many is a major issue.

    But typical.

Leave a Reply