The anti-immigration voices have lost the economic argument
The economics of immigration are unambiguous: the anti-immigration voices have lost the argument and should move on.
The economics of immigration are unambiguous: the anti-immigration voices have lost the argument and should move on.
The word ‘foreigner’ has become so toxic that Britain is now prepared to let refugees drown.
The desire to ‘get on’ isn’t confined to affluent Westerners.
MigrationWatch don’t ‘talk truth to power’. They tell it exactly what it wants to hear: that it’s all the fault of the immigrants.
The UK needs to understand the reasons that drive people to risk everything.
In an article for the Daily Telegraph earlier this year, David Cameron ‘significantly misrepresented’ statistics about the number of British jobs going to foreign workers.
On immigration, we demand that our politicians serve us a dish of fried snowballs and then feign disappointment when they fail to deliver it.
The latest restrictions on migrants claiming benefits won’t only harm migrant workers but also Britons.
Instead of dog-whistling, David Cameron should be helping local government manage the impacts of migration.
There’s very little evidence of the ‘magnetic pull’ of our benefits system. But there is evidence which suggests the Prime Minister wants to win back disillusioned Tory voters who’ve been attracted by UKIP.