Countering the myths that bankers will leave if bonuses are reduced
There is widespread anger because bonuses are out of proportion with average incomes, reasonable reward, or the perceived social usefulness of banks.
There is widespread anger because bonuses are out of proportion with average incomes, reasonable reward, or the perceived social usefulness of banks.
On bankers’ bonuses alone, George Osborne’s constant changes of direction since becoming shadow chancellor in 2005 would be enough to make anyone’s head spin.
Rachel Reeves, Labour MP for Leeds West, reports on the Tory-led government’s failure to take action on bankers’ bonuses, despite all the pre-election rhetoric.
Lord Oakeshott raised the bar on bankers’ bonuses last night. He promised strong action and reiterated Nick Clegg’s words that the Lib Dems “won’t stand idly by” on bank payouts.
Barclays chief executive Bob Diamond was today questioned by the Treasury select committee regarding the behaviour of the bank, reports Claire French.
The government’s failure to take action over bankers’ bonuses does not mean that we can’t get our money’s worth from the banks, argues Ben Fox.
The Labour government in response to the public outrage on bankers’ pay promised to increase transparency by introducing legislation that would force banks to reveal the pay of their top earners. It wouldn’t name and shame but it would, for example, show how many people were earning more than £1 million or more than £10 million in any one bank.