Johnson has a reputation as a serial liar.
As the head of Channel 4 News has pointed out, Boris Johnson is a known liar. He has twice been sacked for lying – first as a journalist at The Times and then as a Tory shadow minister.
He also lied four times in his first Prime Ministers Question Time – so it was no surprise to see him repeatedly misleading the BBC’s Andrew Marr.
1. False claims about Labour’s sentencing plans
Claim – In the context of the London Bridge terror attacker Usman Khan, Johnson said: “I disagree with Jeremy Corbyn and Shami Chakrabati when it comes to having shorter sentences for these people” (repeated twice)
Reality – There is nothing in the Labour manifesto to suggest they would make sentences more lenient for serious violent offenders or terrorists.
Before Johnson’s interview, Shadow Attorney General Shami Chakrabati had told Marr: “I don’t think that now is the time, on the back of a terrorist atrocity two days ago, to be talking about changing the sentencing regime…it’s a really dangerous game to suggest that cheap talk and even cheaper legislation is what is going to keep us safe.”
Did Marr point it out? – Yes. He said “she’s not talking about that” before moving on to his next question. When Johnson repeated the lie, he did not challenge it again.
2. On Disbanding Mi5
Claim – Johnson twice repeated his claim that “Jeremy Corbyn has said he would disband Mi5”.
Reality – Corbyn has not said that. BBC News asked the Conservative Party for evidence of this claim and they have yet to receive it.
Did Marr point it out? – No.
3. On NHS investment
Claim – Johnson said twice: “We are so determined to make huge investments in the NHS…the largest in modern memory”.
Reality – According to the BBC, the Conservatives’ planned investment in real terms (accounting for inflation) is £20.5bn by 2023-2024. This is a 3.2% annual increase. The 1997-2010 Labour government increased NHS spending by 6% a year, according to the Health Foundation. So it’s not the largest in modern memory.
Did Marr point it out? – No. He moved on to questioning the Conservatives’ misleading ‘40 news hospitals’ and ‘50,000 more nurses’ claims.
4. On the living wage
Claim – “We’re lifting the living wage by its biggest ever increase.”
Reality – The living wage is defined as “what people need to live on” and is set by the Living Wage Foundation – not by government.
What Johnson is referring to is something called the “National Living Wage” which is actually a new name given to the minimum wage by chancellor George Osborne.
The Conservatives have pledged to increast the ‘National Living Wage’/minimum wage to 2/3 of average earnings by 2024 – currently (they say) forecast to be around £10.50 an hour.
The living wage is currently £9.30 outside of London and £10.75 in London. So the Tories want the minimum wage in 2024 to be less than what Londoners need to live on now.
Did Marr point it out? No. He tried to get Johnson to answer his question about libraries.
5. On Islamophobia complaints
Claim – When asked about two Tory candidates Islamophobic comments, Johnson said: “There is an independent process which needs to consider all such accusations of prejudice of any kind”
Reality – The process is not independent. According to the Conservative Party website, complaints are considered by a panel of three or more people appointed by the Conservative Party chairman. At least one of these must be a member of the voluntary party and one must be independent.
If the complaint is about an MP, the panel must include at least one person nominated by the chair of the 1922 committee. The 1922 committee represents the Tory parliamentary party and its chair is currently Graham Brady.
The panel provide their findings to the Party Chairman, “recommending the appropriate level of the Party at which the complaint should be resolved”. The final decision rests with the party chairman – currently MP James Cleverley and unelected businessman Ben Elliot.
6. On Child poverty
Claim – There are 400,000 fewer children in poverty than there were in 2010.
Reality – According to Full Fact: “None of the main measures of poverty in the UK show this.” There are four main measures of child poverty. By two measures, it is up 100,000 since 2010/2011. By the third measure, relative low income, it is up 500,000. By the fourth, it has stayed about the same.
Update: This article was update on 3/12 to include number six.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
6 Responses to “Six times Johnson misled Andrew Marr”
Cost of Johnson
We’re maintaining a list of his, and the Tories’, lies and it’s exhausting. They just can’t stop themselves, and they are utterly unfit to govern.
Joe
No article on the current main issue – Islamic Terrorism !!!
It won’t go away.
Labour are soft on terrorism and the causes of terrorism.
Julia Gibb
Why are we not discussing the obvious flaw in full term sentencing of terrorist. Had the most recent attack been carried out by a person who had served a full term what would Boris have promised?
A radical person will wait, and wait until he can take action.
The “full term” will have no impact. Programmes to de-radicalise will. However should these be effective we are now going to keep people locked up!
Why are we a target? Perhaps our love of force projection (an Empire legacy) has much to do with it.
Tories run 4 misleading Facebook adverts | Left Foot Forward
[…] This election has been marked by dishonesty. During Boris Johnson’s interview with Andrew Marr, he made at least five misleading claims. […]
Patrick Newman
The BBC are anti-Labour and anti Corbyn – tell me something new! Marr is a useless interviewer and that is why Johnson was so pleased the BBC gave in to the pressure to get Johnson in front of Andrew Neil. Neil is not so much ferocious more that he does (or his researchers) do his homework. The BBC’s reporting of the Chief Rabbi’s outrageous personal and political attack on Corbyn stopping at a micron short of calling him evil was given more coverage than the London Bridge terrorist attack. A responsible balanced report would have challenged or questioned Rabbi Mirvis’s motivation for the outburst and the rationale for making the accusation (Oh dear is it an election now!).