Comment: anti-Muslim hatred is a self-fulfilling prophecy

Those who discriminate against Muslims are playing directly into the hands of IS

 

Anti-Muslim hatred leads people directly into the hands of IS recruiters and aggravates the very issue of radicalisation that we are trying to avert. The more people act out of fear and cause Muslims to be ostracised in our society, the greater the chances of them turning to extremism.

If all Muslims are approached as if they were extremists, with hostility and hatred, they may indeed develop such extremist views in order to defend themselves from this treatment.

Recent figures show that anti-Muslim hate crimes are up by 70 per cent. These crimes vary from cyber-bullying to extreme violence, but it appears that women, particularly those who are identifiably Muslim through their clothing, are targeted more frequently than others. As a result, many Muslims feel under attack and vulnerable in their own country, something that should surely be avoided in a liberal democratic state like ours.

Those who discriminate against Muslims are doing exactly what IS want. As hate crimes are committed, Muslims are cornered into looking elsewhere for protection, identity and solutions. This vacuum leaves Muslims vulnerable and thus more open to extremist exploitation.

IS propaganda is specifically designed to target those who are unfulfilled, defenceless or aggrieved. As Quilliam’s Charlie Winter has put it, IS ‘sell themselves as champions of social justice, law, order and defiance in the face of the ‘oppressor”. Hate crimes and anti-Muslim bigotry push people into a state that makes them more open to IS propaganda and, therefore, more vulnerable to radicalisation.

Hate crimes affect not only the current generation but also our children. We know environmental factors play a key role in growing up for young people. As hate crimes surge, the next generation is increasingly exposed to views that incorrectly paint all Muslims as extremists. This may cause Muslim children to grow up vulnerable to radicalisation, defensive about their faith, and less likely to integrate into British society. This defence can quickly turn to offence as more radicalising triggers present themselves.

Moreover, hate crimes hinder the public image of counter-extremism by unintentionally creating the façade that Islam, rather than Islamism, is being opposed. Counter-extremism tackles radicalisation and extremism as phenomena and is opposed to those who commit or support ideologically-motivated intolerance, violent or otherwise, to further political aims.

If Muslims are being attacked for their faith rather than Islamists challenged for their bigotry, we reduce ourselves to the very intolerance we are trying to fight. This is why human rights are so important to counter-extremism.

Rather than acting out of hate, those concerned about extremism should respond in more constructive ways:

1. We should defend the right for freedom from discrimination and the rights for people to practise their own religion or wear religious attire. We are all entitled to these freedoms, regardless of race, gender, religion or sexuality.

2. We must stop confusing the religion of Islam with the political ideology of Islamist extremism. That way, when we challenge extremists, we will not cause prejudice or impair anyone’s right to practise their faith.

3. When faced with extremism, whether Islamist, far-right or others, we should challenge it just as we would challenge bullying or racism. Preventing extremism is not a job solely for the government or security forces to uphold, but rather a role for everyone to engage in.

4. As TellMAMA identifies, we should engage with cross-cultural exchange and dialogue amongst all cultures, irrespective of faith differences. This will not only make our nation more open and accepting of varied backgrounds, but will also mean that Muslims can play a constructive role in challenging the extremism in their communities.

As a result of these constructive actions, people will feel increasingly at home in their own nation and IS propaganda will have less of a foothold. Critically, these actions are not only useful for combatting extremism; they are also vital components of life in Britain that are worth defending.

Therefore, as anti-Muslim hatred diminishes, so will the perceived need for it.

Jonathan Russell is a political liaison officer and Rachel Bryson is a researcher, both at Quilliam

Want to read more posts like this? Then *sign-up to Look Left* and make sure you have the facts to rebut right-wing spin 

76 Responses to “Comment: anti-Muslim hatred is a self-fulfilling prophecy”

  1. Jerry S

    “As a result, many Muslims feel under attack and vulnerable in their own country,”

    Good. Maybe that will encourage them to move back to the sh*t hole they came from.

    Why would you run away from a country because of the violent, poor, 3rd world conditions – and bring all your violent, poor, 3rd world cultures and habits with you?

  2. Mick

    There’s NOTHING in the New Testament about killing people. The is in the Koran, in spadefuls!

    Moral equivalency is the new left wing cowardice. Like Jeremy Corbyn saying ISIS are ‘merely’ no worse than American soldiers!

    You cretinous people disgust me to my bones.

  3. Jerry S

    We should use the same argument:

    “I don’t know why Islamists keep attacking westerners. They’re just recruiting more Crusaders by their actions.”

  4. Jerry S

    Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.

    Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.

    – The River War: An Historical Account of the Reconquest of the Soudan (1899), by Winston Churchill

  5. Jerry S

    75 years ago, Lebanon was a prosperous, predominantly Christian country. It was a popular vacation spot, and commercial and banking center often compared to Switzerland. Beruit was called the Paris of the Mideast

    Circa 1950 Lebanon generously took in Islamic refugees from Syria and other war-torn areas. With the defeat of the PLO in Jordan (September 1970), many Palestinian militants relocated to Lebanon. This led to increasing sectarian tensions between Palestinians versus the Maronites (Lebanese Christians) and other Lebanese factions.

    Now Lebanon is hell on earth. A multifaceted civil war among Christians, Sunnis and Shiites from 1975 to 1990 simmers to this day.

    Europe is committing suicide by accepting Islamic migrants.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=336&v=I2eITTAaNKo

Comments are closed.