Caroline Dinenage wrote to constitutents voicing her opposition to equal marriage
David Cameron’s cabinet reshuffle continues today, with the appointment of Caroline Dinenage to the post of minister for equalities. Dinenage retained her Gosport seat in the election, and is part of Cameron’s new drive to increase the number of women at the Cabinet table.
But a look at Dinenage’s voting record raises questions about her suitability for the job.
In 2013 she voted against the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill at its Second Reading in the House of Commons. She voted for other components of the bill in order to stay loyal to the Tory party line, and was absent for the Bill’s Third Reading.
But there is no ambiguity in Dinenage’s comments on the issue. Responding to a letter from a PinkNews reader the day before the reading, she wrote:
“As you may know, as the established Church, its own Canon Law is part of the law of the land and one of its canons states that marriage is in its nature a union of “one man and one woman”.
I therefore believe that the institution of marriage is distinctive and the State has no right to redefine its meaning – these proposals were not included in any of the three main manifestoes nor did it feature in the Coalition’s Programme for Government.
“As I have mentioned, under current law same-sex couples can have a civil partnership but not a civil marriage and I believe that there is no legitimate reason to change this. Preventing same-sex couples from being allowed to ‘marry’ takes nothing away from their relationship.”
She also told a local newspaper:
‘I’m concerned that in the future teachers may be forced to teach civil partnership and gay marriage whether it’s in their religious belief to do so or not.”
Further back, in 2011, Dinenage was listed by the Daily Mail as one of 118 Tory MPs who had written to constituents stating their opposition to proposals to allow gay marriage. The Mail reported at the time:
“The sheer scale of the opposition means Mr Cameron is facing what has become the biggest Tory rebellion in recent history.”
The list included Cameron’s former equalities minister Nicky Morgan, who also voted against gay marriage.
Is there something the PM isn’t quite getting?
Ruby Stockham is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter
107 Responses to “‘No legitimate reason’ for same-sex marriage: meet the new equalities minister”
Sophia Marsden
By what right do you try and force your social beliefs about marriage on people with other beliefs.
It’s a zero sum game. The particular right to get married has been tied up with social obligations on others (to bake cakes to name a topical one). That means that there can be no compromise.
Now obviously you are going to win this and your opponents are going to get shunned and fined. But don’t pretend that no-one is getting trampled. You’re glad they’re getting trampled, they deserve it for committing the sin of not celebrating same-sex marriage. “That’s never going to happen, and when it does you bigots will deserve it”.
Sophia Marsden
Hope you don’t have oral or anal sex, both are sexual misconduct according to all mainstream buddhist traditions (Vajrayana, Theravada etc).
Lutesuite
If we see very unpopular gay people (you may dispute this) getting married, that will drive my own (and indeed every wife/husband’s) marriage into disrepute too.
So are you suggesting that only popular people who are beloved by all should be allowed to get married? Why are you so confident you fit into that category?
Lutesuite
Sorry, Mike Stallard. Aren’t you the same person who just claimed that gay people are so universally disliked that they will bring the institution of marriage into disrepute? And then you accuse someone else of being “aggressive” against Catholics? Look in the mirror.
Jeanne Tomlin
Really. I wasn’t aware that the law forced you to have a same sex marriage. How unjust.
Oh.
Wait.
It doesn’t. It just keeps you from interfering in MY life.