Comment: Labour didn’t lose the election because of Scotland

Miliband ditched New Labour but, beyond a basket of populist gimmicks he struggled to find anything with which to replace it


Labour leader Ed Miliband didn’t ultimately confound expectations; instead he appears to have confirmed the worst fears of his harshest critics. The psephology of the past four weeks, predicting neck and neck polls and a hung parliament, turned out to be wildly inaccurate; in the secrecy of the polling booth, pencil in hand, millions of so-called ‘shy Tories’ braced themselves and put a cross next to a Conservative candidate.

Pundits have been waiting for weeks for the Tory surge in the polls, the surge which supposedly comes with incumbency and familiarity. And it did come, but not until the day of the election once the entire Westminster village had already bet the house on a hung parliament and prepared for weeks of arduous coalition negotiations.

The Conservatives have thumped Labour and David Cameron will return to office with a mandate to push through policies far more extreme than anything seen in the past five years. That’s not to say we weren’t warned. According to a recent report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, George Osborne’s austerity programme for the next parliament will see Britain endure a tighter tax and spending squeeze than any other major economy. £12 billion in welfare cuts will hit the most vulnerable members of society.

Such has been the electoral massacre of Liberal Democrat MPs that the party’s involvement in future coalitions of any sort are in doubt. Vince Cable was deposed by the voters of west London, former leader Charles Kennedy is gone, as are Danny Alexander, David Laws and Simon Hughes. Nick Clegg clung on – just – though the scale of his party’s collapse means he will almost certainly step down in the coming days.

The nearest historical precedent for Labour’s dismal performance is 1992, when Conservative Prime Minister John Major thrashed Neil Kinnock despite Labour holding a narrow poll lead right up until the election. Much like then, the apparent closeness of the race in the lead up to the vote appears to have played into Tory hands, alerting hostile sections of the electorate to the fact that Labour could actually win.

Kinnock, though, never had to deal with a thriving Scottish National Party. Whereas Scotland was once solid Labour territory, today the party looks set to be wiped out. Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy is gone, and this election’s Portillo moment came when Labour Shadow Foreign Secretary and Election Coordinator Douglas Alexander lost his seat to a fresh-faced 20 year-old from the Scottish National Party.

And yet it would be a mistake to claim the election was lost in Scotland. Labour has performed disastrously right across the UK due to a lacklustre campaign that was big on financial bean counting but devoid of vision. Miliband ditched New Labour but, beyond a basket of populist gimmicks he struggled to find anything with which to replace it. He paid lip service to inequality but convinced few people that he had the mettle to challenge it. He zigzagged on immigration in an attempt to please everyone and predictably pleased no-one. As for foreign policy – well, did anybody even know?

Faced with a resurgent Conservative party that will now believe it has carte blanche to hack away at what’s left of the welfare state, the General Election isn’t just a calamity for the Labour party; it’s a disaster for the country. Think more food banks, bourgeoning inequality and a further deterioration of the NHS. Nick Clegg may have been the left-wing bogeyman of the last five years, but we may look back on the recent coalition as a period of civility and restraint when compared to what’s about to follow.

James Bloodworth is the editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter

101 Responses to “Comment: Labour didn’t lose the election because of Scotland”

  1. Ocromwell

    Labour lost by being too ” Unionist “. The English are looking for leaders of Salmond/Sturgeon stature and of course a Parliament of their own

  2. Mike Shepherd

    I am up here in Aberdeen. Dame Anne Begg has just been thrashed by a young and bright SNP Councillor in a prosperous part of Scotland’s oil town by 20000 to 12000. Nobody saw that coming. You just can’t see Labout ever retrieving those types of losses for at least a couple of generations.

  3. Gerschwin

    Well look no further then Crommers, I give you fabulous David Cameron, excellent Boris Johnson, super duper George Osborne and the rest of the fantastic gang. In the last sixth months they’ve spanked Salmond into oblivion, last night they gave your Johnny and damned good (and thoroughly deserved) thrashing. Sturgeon is next on their list you can be sure, swiftly followed by Juncker. It’s all happening, so buckle up, strap yourself in for five years of excellence, superb government, growth, stability and the resurgence of GREAT Britain…I feel some Elgar coming on!
    Cheers to you Crommers old chap!

  4. Nikki Williams

    Let’s not also forget the ‘shy uneducated working class racists’ who deserted the Labour of their parents and placed their mark against UKIP and the proud Labour voters in Tory likely constituencies who could not stomach propping up the Liberals again after 2010 and votes Labour and making Labour the second party to the Tories in many consituencies where once second or first place was the Liberals.

  5. EqualOpportunityCynic

    I’m pretty ignorant of UK politics but followed the election pretty closely from the US. Does the much-lauded exit poll include internal polling on why voters broke for the Conservatives? So far the analysis I’ve heard seems long on speculation and short on actual research.
    (Not criticizing this piece; perhaps educated guesses are all we have right now.)

    I worry that you have the same situation in the UK that we have here in the US, where the public overwhelmingly supports Democratic/Labour positions on economic issues but it doesn’t come out at the ballot box.

Comments are closed.