Celebrations at Palestine UN vote – but UK abstention attacked as “historic misjudgement”

Yesterday saw the UN vote to make Palestine a ‘non-member observer state’ - a vote the UK abstained from.


Yesterday the UN voted resoundingly to upgrade Palestine’s status to a non-member observer state, a decision met with applause, a standing ovation and celebrations on the streets of Ramallah.

Although not a member state, the promotion does afford Palestine potential membership of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and a voice in UN debates. The vote was passed overwhelmingly, 138-9, with 41 countries abstaining. Included amongst the abstentions was the UK.

Despite Left Foot Forward having clearly laid out the reasons and moral obligations to vote in favour, the UK abstained on the basis of leader of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, having not explicitly stated he would renew peace talks with Israel.

Shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander criticised the decision to abstain, tweeting:

“The UK Govt’s decision to abstain on the UN vote on enhanced status for Palestinians is worse than a blunder. It is a historic misjudgement.”


“Vote for enhanced status for Palestinians at UN is an important non-violent legal and diplomatic step towards a negotiated 2 state solution”

The UK and Germany were isolated in their abstention amongst the vast majority of European nations, who voted for the measure, including France, Italy and Spain. Many believe this move to be a step towards a two-state solution and formal recognition of Palestine as a state; more than just symbolic, it also offers legitimacy to Abbas over his militant rivals in Gaza, Hamas.

Others, however have criticised it, such as Ali Abunimah, a Palestinian-American activist. He described both the UN and the celebrations as a “distraction”.

The highest profile no votes, unsurprisingly, were from the US and Israel. The US has attempted to quantify its position and criticise the decision made by the UN by saying that the move was “counter-productive”, warning it may result in a reduction of US economic support for Palestine.

The reaction in the Israeli press has been similarly downbeat.

The liberal-left broadsheet Ha’aretz went with the headline:

“UN vote gives U.S. Jews one more reason to worry about Israel’s future”


“Israel suffers humiliating defeat at UN”

Yediot Aharonot, one of Israel’s most widely read papers, went with downplaying the Palestinian celebration, emphasising their number as a “few thousand” and writing of the heckles the Israeli Ambassador received when he appeared on a large screen set up in Yasser Arafat square.

Despite some of the negative reaction, the promotion of Palestine to an observer state must surely to be welcomed.

See also:

Five reasons the UK should back Palestine’s UN bidNovember 29th, 2012

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

35 Responses to “Celebrations at Palestine UN vote – but UK abstention attacked as “historic misjudgement””

  1. wrfrwe

    I think Newsbot wants that for all other countries but not for Israel for some reason!!

  2. Newsbot9

    Yes yes, you want genocide. Never mind reality. There is, of course, sharp differences between ideals and the situation on the ground when you have that degree of hostility and terrorism at play – and no, your far right isn’t nearly the sort of threat to Britain that would require anything such.

    (Moreover, the answer would be to crack down on your far right!)

  3. Newsbot9

    No, just between the far right and everyone else.

    Moreover, destroying cultures via conquering and killing most of the objectors is not how things are generally done these days. While I’m sure you’d like to go back to that…

  4. ron

    They’ll be happier sharing a nation in the longer term. Sure there’ll be some adjustment – but they’ll be a more peaceful nation at ease with themselves if joined. Remember diversity is strength!

  5. ron

    Arabs and Jews living in 1 state in the middle east – sharing,assimilating, loving. A beacon of inspiration to how the world can be when enemies lay down their arms and live together in peace. A 1 state solution isn’t just preferable but utterly necessary to show that love can win out over hate.

Comments are closed.