Yesterday saw the UN vote to make Palestine a ‘non-member observer state’ - a vote the UK abstained from.
Yesterday the UN voted resoundingly to upgrade Palestine’s status to a non-member observer state, a decision met with applause, a standing ovation and celebrations on the streets of Ramallah.
Although not a member state, the promotion does afford Palestine potential membership of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and a voice in UN debates. The vote was passed overwhelmingly, 138-9, with 41 countries abstaining. Included amongst the abstentions was the UK.
Despite Left Foot Forward having clearly laid out the reasons and moral obligations to vote in favour, the UK abstained on the basis of leader of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, having not explicitly stated he would renew peace talks with Israel.
Shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander criticised the decision to abstain, tweeting:
“The UK Govt’s decision to abstain on the UN vote on enhanced status for Palestinians is worse than a blunder. It is a historic misjudgement.”
And:
“Vote for enhanced status for Palestinians at UN is an important non-violent legal and diplomatic step towards a negotiated 2 state solution”
The UK and Germany were isolated in their abstention amongst the vast majority of European nations, who voted for the measure, including France, Italy and Spain. Many believe this move to be a step towards a two-state solution and formal recognition of Palestine as a state; more than just symbolic, it also offers legitimacy to Abbas over his militant rivals in Gaza, Hamas.
Others, however have criticised it, such as Ali Abunimah, a Palestinian-American activist. He described both the UN and the celebrations as a “distraction”.
The highest profile no votes, unsurprisingly, were from the US and Israel. The US has attempted to quantify its position and criticise the decision made by the UN by saying that the move was “counter-productive”, warning it may result in a reduction of US economic support for Palestine.
The reaction in the Israeli press has been similarly downbeat.
The liberal-left broadsheet Ha’aretz went with the headline:
“UN vote gives U.S. Jews one more reason to worry about Israel’s future”
“Israel suffers humiliating defeat at UN”
Yediot Aharonot, one of Israel’s most widely read papers, went with downplaying the Palestinian celebration, emphasising their number as a “few thousand” and writing of the heckles the Israeli Ambassador received when he appeared on a large screen set up in Yasser Arafat square.
Despite some of the negative reaction, the promotion of Palestine to an observer state must surely to be welcomed.
See also:
• Five reasons the UK should back Palestine’s UN bid – November 29th, 2012
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
35 Responses to “Celebrations at Palestine UN vote – but UK abstention attacked as “historic misjudgement””
treborc1
They use to be, the nomadic people of that area were both Arab and Jewish, sadly now of course it’s a split nation
Newsbot9
Yes yes, you keep arguing for forcing the Jews into an impossible security situation.
Newsbot9
Ah yes, because you can magically make tensions go away. I’m sorry you disagree with the Good Friday agreement…
rwef
what’s impossible about different people sharing a country? isn’t it what all you multiculturalists want?
larnaca
not magic – assimilation – notice any tensions between Jutes and Angles these days?