“The results are in: Keynesians have been completely right, Austerians utterly wrong - at vast human cost” - so wrote Nobel laureate Paul Krugman today.
.
“The results are in: Keynesians have been completely right, Austerians utterly wrong – at vast human cost” – so wrote Nobel prize winning economist Paul Krugman in the New York Times following yesterday’s announcement Britain is in a double-dip recession.
He is, of course, absolutely right; for starters, compare our own austerity-driven failure to the fate of the US economy. As Left Foot Forward reported yesterday, the US economy is now 0.8 per cent above its pre-crisis peak, while the UK economy is 4.3 per cent below, as Graph 1 shows.
Graph 1:
Krugman adds:
“It’s important to understand that what we’re seeing isn’t a failure of orthodox economics. Standard economics in this case – that is, economics based on what the profession has learned these past three generations, and for that matter on most textbooks – was the Keynesian position.
“The austerity thing was just invented out of thin air and a few dubious historical examples to serve the prejudices of the elite…
“I wish I could believe that this would really be enough for us to move on and consider what can be done, now that we know that the ideas behind recent policy were all wrong. But that’s wishful thinking, I suppose.
“Nobody ever admits that they were wrong, and Austerian ideas clearly have an emotional and political appeal that is resilient to any and all evidence.”
• Krugman savages the “austerity debacle” 30 Jan 2012
• Krugman: Coalition is “bleeding” Britain dry 1 Dec 2011
• Obama/Cameron love-in comes unstuck over cuts 25 May 2011
• Krugman joins chorus for Tobin tax 30 Nov 2009
• Krugman: balanced budget would be “worst thing for future generations” 29 Sep 2011
And it’s not just progressive economists saying so – some on the right are finally coming round to recognising the insanity of extreme austerity.
The Daily Beast’s Andrew Sullivan writes:
“If austerity kills growth and thereby revenues, the debt problem can worsen. And Britain, remember, isn’t in the eurozone; it has some currency flexibility to ride some of the shocks. Even so, the passage this ship has to pass through to growth and lower debt is getting narrower and the rocks and tides more treacherous.
“The goal of structural fiscal balance within one five-year parliament has already been abandoned in the face of reality.
“As I’ve said before, I have a long record of fiscal hawkishness. I’m a Tory and want them to succeed. But the one time I worry about fiscal retrenchment is in a period of global recession, where premature austerity can hurt, not help.
“The key is to stimulate enough to get the economy moving on its own momentum and then phase in serious long term structural budget cuts and tax reform.”
134 Responses to “Krugman: “Keynesians have been completely right, Austerians utterly wrong””
Anonymous
Loon, I see. Gigged any niggers lately?
What? That’s a statement on your “level”, which you so gleefully descend to. Then you whine when someone uses a small fraction of the level of hyperbole which you, Tory troll, descend to on a regular basis.
Your hatred of democracy, of the 99% and of the law is sick.
Anonymous
Except Germany hasn’t had lower growth.
And “illusionary”, right. It’s SO terrible that people can afford to feed themselves and their children, and it must be ended.
tangentreality
Why does cutting tax automatically result in a reduction in services? Again, you assume that the State is 100% efficient. IT IS NOT. Private sector companies cut costs without harming services ALL THE TIME. Why should the State be exempt from that?
tangentreality
I have never said that no public service is good, nor have I mandated that all public services should be closed down. Again, your babbling bears little resemblance to reality.
You aren’t listening at all, just shouting at the top of your voice, with your eyes shut and your fingers in your ears.
Anonymous
Yes, you most certainly have. You’ve repeatedly said so.
I’m reading what you type, nothing else. Your continued attack on the CONCEPT of public services is typical.