The ‘Dalits’ of Dale Farm have needs too

The case of the Travellers illegally camped at Dale Farm who are set to be forcibly evicted shines a rare spotlight on to the lives of traveller communities.

The case of the 400 Irish Travellers illegally camped at Dale Farm in Essex and who are set to be forcibly evicted following the exhaustion of their legal appeals, shines a rare spotlight on to the lives of traveller communities.

The contested six-acre plot of greenbelt they inhabit (and which the travellers themselves own) was formerly a scrap yard before they moved onto it in 2001. Throughout this period, local Basildon council has been trying to uphold planning law and remove them.

Although the site is adjacent to a legal traveller encampment, it is too small to house the Dale Farm community. Their eviction will therefore leave them to the mercies of the open road, with no nearby alternative provision.

This will mean breaking up the tightly-knit extended families that currently live together and forcing traveller children from nearby schools.

While there is a balance to be struck between the interests of the travellers and the legitimate concerns of local residents, the broader experience is one where traveller and gypsy communities still face open hostility and discrimination that simply would not be countenanced against any other minority group.

Rather like Indian Dalits, they have become our ‘untouchables’, vilified for their unwanted presence and cruelly parodied for their lifestyle.

Over in the Daily Telegraph, onetime arch-lefty networker turned Conservative cheerleader, Cristina Odone, describes Irish Travellers as “troublesome land-grabbers” and claims their status as a distinct ethnic grouping is a “fiction”. Her equally kneejerk colleague, Ed West, goes further – belittling the travellers’ ethnic status as “a scam”.

Responding to the claim they have been part of the British agricultural tradition for 500 years he scoffs:

“Of course, because caravan sites and scrapyards always feature in Turner’s bucolic portraits of the British countryside.”

Despite such snide and ill-informed attacks, the Department for Communities and Local Government recognises the problems travelling communities face:

“Gypsies and travellers face the most serious disadvantages of all ethnic minority groups with a much shorter life expectancy, low income and poor access to finance. Their children have high mortality rates and the lowest educational attainment.”

Commenting on the historical failure to provide enough sites for Britain’s estimated 300,000 travellers, DCLG adds:

“Top-down traveller site provision targets have failed to deliver – a recent Equality and Human Rights Commission report estimated that at current rates of permanent pitch provision it would take 18 years to hit targets set for 2011.”

Yet despite acknowledging some of the problems travelling communities face, ministers are set to worsen their plight with ‘light-touch guidance’ to local authorities about their responsibilities in maintaining sites and will introduce:

“Stronger planning enforcement powers to help local authorities deal with breaches of planning control…”

Essex County Council, which is responsible for the education and social services of the Dale Farm traveller families, boasts on its “Service for Gypsies and Travellers” webpage that it has a “robust range of services and support available”. In reality, this appears to be little more than a series of links relating to enforcement policies.

An unfair emphasis given DCLG figures show more than four out of five travellers live on authorised sites.

This only serves as a microcosm of the wider problem; with Travellers framed as a ‘problem’ to be managed, rather than people who deserve basic respect and access to decent services. There is no mention on the county council site about any health or welfare services or any guidance about how to access them. This is especially galling as the Irish Travellers and Gypsies suffer from positively medieval health inequalities and a markedly reduced life expectancy that should shame any decent society.

A report from the Diocese of Dublin three years ago found a staggering 80 per cent of Irish Travellers die before they reach 65, with a third dead before they reach 25 – levels on a par with the worst parts of Africa.

Irish Travellers are categorised as a separate ethnic grouping in the census. Their distinct lifestyle, traditions and culture makes them so. This obliges statutory agencies like local councils and health authorities to shape services to meet their needs. However ethnic monitoring is notoriously patchy, with ‘White’ minority communities often missing out from ‘colour blind’ officialdom.

Meanwhile, back at Dale Farm, Basildon Borough Council naively insists the matter is a “planning issue” rather than a “humanitarian” problem, as the Catholic Bishop of Brentwood, Thomas McMahon, described it on a visit to the site earlier this week.

Forcibly evicting these families and bulldozing their homes and amenities is simply putting a social problem out onto the road on four wheels; as traveller and mother-of-two Mary O’Brien, who has lived on the site for 10 years, put it:

“All this will do is move us 50 yards down the road and it will be a huge waste of public money.”

Yet Basildon Council remains resolute, willing to countenance spending £8 million on the eviction. A statement from council leader, Tony Ball, insists they have spent “ten years trying to avoid a forced clearance”.

It is a shame they have not spent the last decade looking at more imaginative solutions that might have avoided the need to do so.

119 Responses to “The ‘Dalits’ of Dale Farm have needs too”

  1. Ed's Talking Balls

    ‘So you feel the same about other ethnic minorities too Adam?’

    I think this comment is objectionable and leads us on a road to nowhere.

    If a white person is a nuisance neighbour, then that’s that. Surely the same goes for a black people, Jews, travellers, martians, etc. In my experience, when you have issues with a neighbour, you don’t give a toss what they look like/where they came from, etc. You just regard them as a bloody nuisance and wish they would stop being so inconsiderate.

    What I gathered from Adam’s comment was that he did not object to the travelling community because of who they are, but because of what they do. That’s the important point.

    You can’t really be suggesting that belonging to an ethnic minority gives one carte blanche to behave as one sees fit (in this instance, in a manner contrary to the law) while also providing a shield against any criticism?

  2. Leon Wolfson

    Anon E Mouse – And again you prove you don’t have the slightest concept of what you’re talking about. You just keep on with your racist attack on the Pavee.

    I was quite correct about your party affiliation, as people can see.

  3. DarrellGoodliffe

    RT @leftfootfwd: The ‘Dalits’ of Dale Farm have needs too http://t.co/ZohdLz6

  4. Trofim

    You couldn’t make it up, could you. Travellers, a group of people who specifically define themselves by the fact that they find it psychologically oppressive to stay in one place, are complaining that they are being forced to – yes, you’ve got it – travel. Unbelievable!
    Do they have genetic evidence from DNA samples to support their claim to be an ethnic minority? Why should I take their word for it? I understand that Haplogroup I is far more prevalent in Eastern England than in western England. Does this mean that if I travel from Worcester to Hull or Ipswich I become a member of an ethnic minority? I did meet a bloke from Grimsby in Worcester the other day. I did feel that somehow he was, well, from a different race. Come to think of it, I don’t like eating horse meat, I like a bit of bare knuckle fighting when I’m pissed, and I don’t let the missus in the kitchen when she’s having her monthlies. Could I be a traveller without knowing it? After all, I seem to share their, erm, culture.

  5. Helenthemadex

    Would everyone offer support to the millionaire buisnessman if he illegally built a mansion in a geenbelt area?

    I doubt it so why should these buildings not be knocked down, they knew they were breaking the law and did not have permision when they built them.

    Yet again a bunch of law breakers screaming about the supposed abuses of their human rights and ethnic status,they need to see that they are not about the law, ethnic minority or not!!

Comments are closed.