Looking behind the headlines in today’s employment figures

Today’s job figures are good, but the news on public sector employment is turning gloomy much faster than expected - and there are quite a few other worries.

Overall, today’s job figures (pdf) are good, but the news on public sector employment is turning gloomy much faster than was expected and there are quite a few other worries.

The headlines are the obvious good news items:

• There were 80,000 more people in employment in February to April than in November to January;

• Over the same period the number unemployed fell by 88,000 (the largest quarterly fall since August 2000);

• The number of unemployed young people under 25 fell 79,000;

• The number unemployed over 12 months came down 16,000;

• The number of economically inactive people who want a job is 41,000 lower.

There are a number of caveats and some worrying figures, which I’ll come to in a moment, but these key results are very good. And they are more than a blip – the April and May figures were positive as well.

Today’s figures mean that the results for the past twelve months are good. Compared with February-April 2010, the latest data show 376,000 more people in employment and 57,000 fewer unemployed. Private sector employment has risen 520,000 over the last 12 months, the highest figure since the current series began in 1999:


Other figures don’t look so good. The number of vacancies fell again, to 456,000, and the ratio of unemployed people to vacancies actually rose, from 5.1:1 to 5.2:2. This ratio has been stuck at more than 5:1 for more than two years:

Private-sector-employment-compared-with-12-months-previously
Men and women are still faring very differently – men’s employment rose by 70,000, women’s by just 10,000 and male unemployment fell by 64,000 while the number of unemployed women was down 24,000. The contrast is even more marked for year-on-year changes:

Employment and unemployment, changes from Feb – Apr 2010

  Employment Unemployment
Men + 313,000 – 103,000
Women + 64,000 + 46,000

Earlier in the year, there were worries that improvements in employment were largely in “atypical” work – part-time and temporary jobs and self-employment. This is less the case than it was, as 257,000 of the 376,000 net employment increase are employees working full-time, but it remains a cause for concern.

The number of people working part-time is 178,000 more than it was 12 months ago and the proportion of total employment accounted for by people working part-time has risen from 26.9 to 27.2 per cent. There are 1,214,000 people working part-time only because they couldn’t find a full-time job – the highest figure since records began in 1992.

Temporary employment has risen 99,000 over the past 12 months; there are now 1,595,000 workers in temporary jobs (the highest level since September 2002) and 580,000 in these jobs because they couldn’t find permanent work.

But by far the biggest question mark over the employment figures concerns what is happening to public sector employment. Remember that the Office for Budget Responsibility’s (OBR) March Economic and Fiscal Outlook saw general government employment falling by 20,000 between 2010/11 and 2011/12.

Today’s figures on public sector employment from the Office for National Statistics show that, between the first quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011, total public sector employment in fact fell by 143,000. Of course, the time periods are different and the definition of ‘public sector employment’ is rather larger than the ‘general government employment’ used by the OBR. Even so, it is clear that public sector job cuts are happening faster and on a larger scale than was expected by either the OBR or the government.

The largest cuts so far have been in local government, where employment has fallen by 88,000. Another 37,000 have been lost in central government, including the NHS. Even these figures paint too favourable a picture – total public sector employment is artificially raised by the temporary jobs needed to carry out the 2011 census. When they are stripped out, total public sector employment in the first quarter of 2011 stands at 6.147 million – 158,000 lower than in the first quarter of 2010. Excluding the census jobs, civil service employment is down 29,000.

Looking at specific industries, NHS employment is down 10,000, education is down 24,000, public administration down 47,000. There is a tendency for the poorest regions to be hit hardest:

• The South East has lost 1.7 per cent of its public sector workers (12,000) and East Anglia has lost 1.1 per cent (5,000);

• On the other hand, the North East has seen its public sector workforce fall 3.7 per cent (11,000) and the South West has seen a 4.2 per cent reduction (23,000).

But the most important thing to remember about these figures is that the hardest cuts haven’t hit yet. Most of the announcements that built up last summer and autumn related to the 2011-12 financial year, which began in April; these figures are for jobs lost by the end of March. There are still tens of thousands of jobs due to be lost across the public sector.

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today. 

9 Responses to “Looking behind the headlines in today’s employment figures”

  1. yorkierosie

    Looking behind the headlines in today’s employment figures: http://bit.ly/jsWQB4 by @ToUChstoneblog's Richard Exell

  2. Clive Burgess

    Looking behind the headlines in today’s employment figures: http://bit.ly/jsWQB4 by @ToUChstoneblog's Richard Exell

  3. Adam Lent

    Typically strong and nuanced analysis of today's "very good" jobs stats from TUC's @richardexell http://t.co/VUCX9dY

  4. neilrfoster

    Typically strong and nuanced analysis of today's "very good" jobs stats from TUC's @richardexell http://t.co/VUCX9dY

  5. mr. Sensible

    Richard, I must admit I always find myself rather confused by these monthly reports.

    For 1 thing, how come unemployment is down, but the clamant count is up?

    And how come there is no coralation between employment and unemployment?

    Call me an ammiter, but I find these figures just a little confusing!
    🙂

    But what I do know is that the government equalities office doesn’t seem to be doing a lot…

  6. Leon Wolfson

    Mr. Sensible –

    The unemployment count is based on a survey.
    The claimant count is based on actual figures.

  7. Clare Fernyhough

    Headlines for those who never read beyond the headlines.

    19,000 more people claiming unemployment benefits and the connected council tax and housing benefit is not good news with regard to the deficit. As the article points out, there are currently 5 people to every job vacancy; even in boom periods this figure has only dropped slightly.

    The simple fact is that it would take a miracle in our economy to find jobs for all those currently unemployed, in addition to those in the public sector who will become employed and the knock on effect in the private sector because of public sector cuts, and the one million disabled people the government think are capable of work. Ordinary people just don’t understand this point: we’re talking about finding jobs for upwards of 4 million people!!

    How and where these jobs are supposed to be generated we are yet to find out. No one in government seems to know; we just get ‘wooly’ details like Camerons reply concerning those who have cancer and will lose financial support.

    What is certain is that however many jobs the private sector has generated in the last few months, there weren’t enough jobs for the 19,000 new JSA claimants.

  8. Daniel Pitt

    Looking behind the headlines on unemployment figures http://t.co/RwhkVu8 #ConDemNation

  9. Without a Plan B, the record unemployment figures look set to get worse | Left Foot Forward

    […] half of the year, many of us wondered why the employment and unemployment figures were reasonably good, when the GDP figures were […]

Leave a Reply