Richard Exell takes a look at the latest job figures, which show some positive movement but also worrying signs for women and the over 50s.
There is good news in today’s employment figures (pdf) from the Office for National Statistics.
The number of people in employment, 29.24 million, and the employment rate, 70.7 per cent, in January-March, were up from October-December, by 118,000 and 0.2 points respectively. This is the third successive quarter-on-quarter increase and employment is now 416,000 higher than it was twelve months ago; this is very similar to last month’s figure:
ILO unemployment in January-March stood at 2.455 million; this was down 37,000 from October–December and the unemployment rate was down 0.2 points, to 7.7 per cent. Youth unemployment was down, only by 1,000 for 16 and 17 year olds (well within the statistical margin of error), but by a more substantial 29,000 for 18–24 year olds.
Unemployment is 56,000 lower than in January–March 2010; this is not as impressive as the increase in employment and the current level is still 841,000 above the April 2008 figure – just before unemployment started rising:
In the past year, decent monthly employment figures have sometimes been the result of an increase in ‘atypical’ employment – part-time and temporary jobs and self-employment. But this month the number of employees working full-time grew by 146,000 – more than the total increase in employment.
The number of self-employed people actually fell and the increase in the number of full-time workers was almost four times as great as the increase for those working part-time:
|
Quarter-on-quarter change in employment |
|
Employees |
Self-employed |
| + 125,000 | – 13,000 |
| Full-time | Part-time |
| + 94,000 | + 24,000 |
There was, however, an increase in the number of temporary workers of 48,000 and the proportion of workers who are in temporary jobs also rose – from 6.2 to 6.3 per cent. On the other hand, involuntary atypical work declined – the proportion of temporary workers who are in these jobs because they couldn’t find permanent work fell from 37.6 to 36.0 per cent and the proportion of part-time workers in the same position also fell slightly, from 15.3 to 15.2 per cent.
Another cause for concern in the past year is what’s been happening to women’s employment. In recent months, good overall results have sometimes disguised the fact that what has happened to men and women have been very different stories; in particular, women’s unemployment has risen while men’s has fallen. That is less true this month, though there are still worrying differences between what is happening to men and women.
|
Quarter-on-quarter change in employment and unemployment levels (000s) and rates (%) |
|
|
Employment |
|
Unemployment |
|
| Level | Rate | Level | Rate | |
| Men | + 18 | + 0.1 | – 31 | – 0.2 |
| Women | + 100 | + 0.3 | – 5 | – 0.1 |
The increase in women’s employment is very welcome, but the fall in unemployment is quite anaemic and it is still true that, despite overall declines in joblessness, women’s unemployment is 57,000 (0.3 percentage points) higher than it was a year ago.
The claimant count measure of unemployment did not move in a positive direction. For the second month running, this measure – the number claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) – rose while the ILO measure fell. As Scarlet Harris has pointed out on Touchstone, this probably has a great deal to do with the increasing numbers of lone parents having to switch from Income Support to Jobseeker’s Allowance.
Lone parents whose youngest child is aged over 7 have had no benefit alternative to JSA since October last year; previously the age limit was 10. The number of lone parents on the claimant count whose youngest child is over 7 and under 10 has risen in that period from 2,570 to 39,055.
The number of women on the claimant count rose by 9,300 – three times the increase for men; as Scarlett points out, the claimant count for women is at its highest level for 15 years.
The policy of progressively moving lone parents onto JSA began under the Labour government. Whatever the merits this policy may originally have had, it was designed in response to debates that were current before the global financial crisis, the rise in unemployment and the spectre of public sector job cuts.
There must be a question mark about its relevance to a situation where women’s unemployment is still high and the forthcoming cuts will hit employment opportunities for women especially hard.
There are other aspects of today’s figures that suggest we are not out of the woods yet.
While youth unemployment came down, the number of unemployed people aged over 50 to 64 rose by 14,000. This is rather worrying, as older workers have not previously been as hard hit in this recession. In previous recessions, older workers were more likely to be made redundant and then found it harder to get back into employment, it would be very worrying if that were to happen again.
Long-term unemployment continues to rise – the number of people unemployed over 12 months rose by 20,000 and the number unemployed over 24 months by 47,000.
And there are still major unemployment blackspots where there are 20 or more unemployed people chasing every job vacancy. Anjum Klair has produced a list of the ten worst in this month’s figures – more than two thousand unemployed people and just 63 job vacancies in Merthyr Tydfil!
Probably the most worrying item in today’s figures is the falling number of job vacancies: the provisional figure for January–April is just 469,000, a decline of 30,000 from the November-January figures. Although the overall picture today is quite encouraging this is a worrying marker for the future.
Most major recent reports suggest large-scale public sector job losses are in prospect:
• The Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development’s Labour Market Outlook (pdf) reports that “near-term and medium-term employment prospects remain uncertain and subdued compared with pre-recession levels” and “together with the onset of public sector cutbacks, the risk of an employment slowdown appears finely balanced”.
• The Bank of England’s Agents’ summary report (pdf) describes “steady” employment growth in manufacturing and “gradual” growth in business services, but elsewhere, a great deal of uncertainty related to the prospects for household incomes and public sector cuts.
• Markit’s Report on Jobs is probably the most positive, but even they describe a “two-speed jobs market”, and are unable to say “whether the private sector can create enough jobs to offset the expected job losses in the public sector”.
Last month I asked whether that month’s overall good results were a blip. It’s still a finely-balanced question.
16 Responses to “Encouraging job figures – but not for women or the over 50s”
Angela Grandstaff
Encouraging job figures – but not for women or the over 50s: On the other hand, involuntary atypical work declin… http://bit.ly/jsvAdH
John77
You are really struggling to find something to gripe about aren’t you? The number of “discouraged” has fallen so the rise in employment is not fully matched by the fall in unemployment, more people who want a full-time job have got one so fewer people are struggling, more of the part-time jobs are filled by those actually wanting to work part-time, so you headline that reported unemployment for women has risen because some single mothers have been reclassified as unemployed instead of unemployable.
Next time why not just shut up and hope that no-one notices that employment has risen in the cheaper and more efficient private sector more than it has declined in the overpaid public sector.
[In case you haven’t noticed I have been pointing out for years that some public sector employees (e.g. nurses (when I was young) and social workers(now)) are underpaid while others (e.g. architects, train drivers and bureaucrats) are vastly overpaid. Of course, public sector managers have chosen not to sack themselves.
Ben Oliver
Encouraging job figures – but not for women or the over 50s http://bit.ly/ku8q7j
Anon E Mouse
Richard Excell – This article is petty, tribal and shows just how far out of touch Labour activists really are.
Does no one have a single positive remark to make about the Labour Party?
femmeonomics
In the UK, encouraging job figures but not for women http://bit.ly/kc4Fva @leftfootfwd