OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund

The OECD's Employment Outlook has praised the Labour Government's Future Jobs Fund. It says the decision to scrap the scheme by the Coalition is "of concern".

The OECD’s Employment Outlook puts the need for job creation at the centre of its message. Examining the UK, there is praise for Labour’s Future Jobs Fund and “concern” about the Coalition’s decision to scrap it.

The OECD’s country report for the United Kingdom sets out that, “Considering that GDP fell by 6%, the increase in unemployment in the United Kingdom is smaller than would have been predicted based on historical experience. For example, the unemployment rate rose nearly as sharply in the 1990-91 recession even though GDP fell by less than half as much.”

The report goes on to say that:

“Effective re-employment assistance has prevented an even sharper increase in UK joblessness and should be reinforced even in the current context of fiscal consolidation…

“The introduction [by Labour] of the Flexible New Deal (FND) in October 2009 has been useful in the context of the recession because it puts an increased focus on screening skills at an early stage of the unemployment spell, targeting the low-skilled unemployed who are likely to face greater challenges in finding employment.

The document goes on to praise the “cut in employer contributions at the bottom end of the wage ladder [which] should enhance employment opportunities for this workforce group.” Although the spending cuts necessary to pay for this decision could cost 40,000 public sector jobs.

But in strong language the report questions the Coalition’s priorities:

“While the large fiscal deficit makes it essential to focus on cost-effective programmes and target the most disadvantaged groups, labour market policies should remain adequately funded. In this context, it may also be of concern that the new Budget ends funding for two crisis measures, namely, the Future Jobs Fund and the Six Month Offer.”

14 Responses to “OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund”

  1. Stuart Alder

    RT @leftfootfwd: OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund //bit.ly/alE423

  2. Thomas Byrne

    Why is there no much scaremongering about the Future Jobs Fund when

    A) It’s being replaced with a new programme, and
    B_ No-one who currently has a place on the scheme is having it scrapped?

    Over to you Will.

  3. Jess McCabe

    RT @leftfootfwd: OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund //bit.ly/alE423

  4. House Of Twits

    RT @leftfootfwd OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund //bit.ly/alE423

  5. yorkierosie

    RT @leftfootfwd: OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund //bit.ly/alE423

  6. Hitchin England

    OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund //bit.ly/alE423 via @leftfootfwd

  7. Hannah Smith

    RT @leftfootfwd: OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund //bit.ly/alE423

  8. Sam Knight

    RT @leftfootfwd: OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund //bit.ly/alE423

  9. Jacquie Martin

    The report also says governments need to tackle existing unemployment head on and to resist the urge to cut benefits. What does ours do? Cuts benefits and proposes to cut the public sector workforce. Very clever.

  10. Sarah

    OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund | Left … //bit.ly/bQT35C

  11. Darling: GDP rise due to Labour’s approach to "supporting the recovery" | Left Foot Forward

    […] managed the recovery in a way that kept unemployment down”. Two weeks ago, Left Foot Forward reported the OECD’s questioning of the Coalition’s decision to scrap the Future Jobs […]

  12. Welsh government outlines vision for “fairer and more prosperous country” | Left Foot Forward

    […] policy is designed to fill the gap left by the coalition’s decision to scrap the Future Jobs Fund. At the time it was first announced, the Welsh Conservatives’ then finance […]

  13. Unemployment: How Cameron and Clegg are letting the next generation down | Left Foot Forward

    […] April, a ‘Youth Contract’ – a scaled down and less ambitious version of the ‘Future Jobs Fund’ established by Labour, which offered 100,000 jobs to young people who were long-term […]

Leave a Reply