The OECD's Employment Outlook has praised the Labour Government's Future Jobs Fund. It says the decision to scrap the scheme by the Coalition is "of concern".
The OECD’s Employment Outlook puts the need for job creation at the centre of its message. Examining the UK, there is praise for Labour’s Future Jobs Fund and “concern” about the Coalition’s decision to scrap it.
The OECD’s country report for the United Kingdom sets out that, “Considering that GDP fell by 6%, the increase in unemployment in the United Kingdom is smaller than would have been predicted based on historical experience. For example, the unemployment rate rose nearly as sharply in the 1990-91 recession even though GDP fell by less than half as much.”
The report goes on to say that:
“Effective re-employment assistance has prevented an even sharper increase in UK joblessness and should be reinforced even in the current context of fiscal consolidation…
“The introduction [by Labour] of the Flexible New Deal (FND) in October 2009 has been useful in the context of the recession because it puts an increased focus on screening skills at an early stage of the unemployment spell, targeting the low-skilled unemployed who are likely to face greater challenges in finding employment.
The document goes on to praise the “cut in employer contributions at the bottom end of the wage ladder [which] should enhance employment opportunities for this workforce group.” Although the spending cuts necessary to pay for this decision could cost 40,000 public sector jobs.
But in strong language the report questions the Coalition’s priorities:
“While the large fiscal deficit makes it essential to focus on cost-effective programmes and target the most disadvantaged groups, labour market policies should remain adequately funded. In this context, it may also be of concern that the new Budget ends funding for two crisis measures, namely, the Future Jobs Fund and the Six Month Offer.”
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
14 Responses to “OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund”
Hitchin England
OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund http://bit.ly/alE423 via @leftfootfwd
Hannah Smith
RT @leftfootfwd: OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund http://bit.ly/alE423
Sam Knight
RT @leftfootfwd: OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund http://bit.ly/alE423
Jacquie Martin
The report also says governments need to tackle existing unemployment head on and to resist the urge to cut benefits. What does ours do? Cuts benefits and proposes to cut the public sector workforce. Very clever.
OECD questions Coalition decision to scrap Future Jobs Fund « The best Labour blogs
[…] More… […]