Coalition’s super-broadband plan unworkable

As the Libservative coalition has now released its programme for government, Left Foot Forward now looks at what it means for the digital economy.

Left Foot Forward followed the pre-election manuovers of the main political parties around the UK’s requirements for next-generation broadband infrastructure and the then government’s Digital Economy Act. As the Libservative coalition has now released its programme for government, Left Foot Forward now looks at what it means for the digital economy.

The Liberal Democrats’ pre-election desire to repeal the Digital Economy Act was due to a backlash by party members against Lord Clement Davies’s support and obvious connections to the media industry served as a political lightning rod for concerned netizens.

This promise to repeal the act went missing from the Lib Dems’ manifesto and has now been thrown out with Jeremy Hunt, the new culture, Olympics, media and sport secretary, confirming that the new Libservative coalition will not be repealing the Digital Economy Act. Conservative Party leader David Cameron is said to believe that a repeal of the act would be “an unacceptable setback for the important measures it contains”.

It is worth recalling that Cameron formerly worked at Carlton Communications doing PR and parliamentary lobbying for the media company; it is perhaps understandable why he may wish to pander to the interests of the media lobbyists and special interest groups.

Left Foot Forward’s position on the Digital Economy Act is that it is a non-progressive piece of legislation for a number of reasons, amongst those:

• It adversely affects families;

• It adversely affects entrepreneurship and innovation;

• It makes the UK a less desirable destination for inbound investment; and

• The law is opposed by the vast majority of the UK population with civil disobedience promised and a consumption strike under way turning it into the digital equivalent of the infamous poll tax.

The Libservative coalition has taken the country’s broadband infrastructure sufficiently seriously to appoint Ed Vaizey as minister for culture, communications and creative industries or in essence the minister for broadband. Vaizey has been tasked with rolling out super-fast broadband to both urban and rural areas, ensuring alternative providers have equal access to BT exchanges and duct work. There is also a claim that part of the BBC license fee may be used where necessary to aid in the rollout.

Like the plans of the previous Labour government, the Libservative plans on broadband rollout seem to be under-resourced. There is an economic disincentive for many operators to roll service out to poor and remote communities because of the poor return on investment vis-a-vis equipment costs and infrastructure rollout.

A good start to help industry would be to abolish the business rates charged on optical fibre cable, and railroad planning approval for wireless masts; however, the only way to force rural super-broadband roll-out would be by changing the universal service requirements in wireless carrier licenses. Interestingly, none of these measures were discussed in the Libservative coalition programme for government.

The diversion of funding broadband infrastructure from the BBC seems to be a move designed to cripple the BBC’s competitive position in the UK media landscape – implicit state aid for the business interests of ITV and News Corporation. Whilst taking broadband infrastructure seriously is a progressive move, the current road map to achieving universal super-broadband availability seems unworkable.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

16 Responses to “Coalition’s super-broadband plan unworkable”

  1. Andy Sutherland

    RT @leftfootfwd: Coalition's super-broadband plan unworkable:

  2. 10yearsofbb

    Coalition's super-broadband plan unworkable | Left Foot Forward Broadband News

  3. Stew Wilson

    RT @leftfootfwd: Coalition's super-broadband plan unworkable

  4. redarsedbaboon

    Please stop using ‘families’ and ‘consumers’ as synonyms. They aren’t. There’s no need for it.

  5. anyleftiwonder

    most coalition plans will be unworkable

  6. Guido Fawkes

    The BBC position in the UK media landscape is anti-competitive. It is a cultural monolith. Since when has monopoly been “progressive”?

  7. 10yearsofbb

    Coalition’s super-broadband plan unworkable (Left Foot Forward) Broadband News

  8. trevmax

    BBC doesn’t have a competitive position. It transmits mainly shite and in return we have to pay it to do so under the threat of prison. I seriously would like to see the BBC compete. That means I choose to pay if I like what’s on offer. I tried to get them to release earlier archives of The Sky at Night but was told to try the shop of f*ck off. I have already paid for this, surely?

  9. Nick_Osborne

    RT @leftfootfwd: Coalition's super-broadband plan unworkable:

  10. Ruder Finn UK

    RT @leftfootfwd: Coalition's super-broadband plan unworkable:

  11. Neil Borg-Olivier

    Not content with making their own new mistakes, #ConDem repeats Labour past mistakes: #debill

  12. Ged Carroll ジェド キャロル

    RT @leftfootfwd: Coalition's super-broadband plan unworkable:

  13. renaissance chambara | Ged Carroll - Critique of new UK administration’s broadband plans

    […] can find Coalition’s super-broadband plan unworkable over at Left Foot […]

  14. Mr. Sensible

    The coalition’s doing what they had a go at Labour for doing; topslicing the lisence fee.

    And this when Cameron said he wanted it frozen. The numbers do not add up.

    And, Guido, I think I would rather have a public service monopoly than a Murdock monopoly.

  15. Hunt for super-fast broadband | Left Foot Forward

    […] up the road to lay connections – what contractors call reinstatements – by allowing alternative providers to lay cable in current BT […]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.