Tories accused of rigging democracy ahead of boundary changes

The Tory party are plotting a boundary change that would see Labour lose more seats than them

Polling station sign

Prime Minister Boris Johnson is very likely to change the election boundaries ahead of the next General Election, which would increase the Tory majority to 104 seats.

The Tories have been accused of rigging democracy since the changes would disproportionately benefit them compared to other parties.

If this were to happen, the Conservatives would have double the number of seats as the Labour Party.

This is, of course, all theoretical. Pollsters Electoral Calculus worked out how many seats the Tories would have with the new boundaries based on the December 2019 General Election results. This could change in the next election, but the point is, it provides a guide as to the impact of the changes.

The Boundary Commission proposed the reform to reduce the number of seats in the House of Commons from 650 to 600 in 2018.

It’s a change that the Tories have been plotting for a while, claiming that the exisiting electoral boundaries are unfairly biased towards Labour.

Yet with last week’s results and the Tories winning 56% of the seats on 44% of the vote, this argument has weakened.

As things stand now, the reforms would mean the Tories would have 352 seats, Labour would have 174 and the SNP would have 47.

Due to how the boundaries would change, the Tories would lose 13 seats, Labour would lose 29, the SNP would drop two.

So the number of MPs in the House of Commons would decrease, and each seat would have about 75,000 voters in it.

The aim is to help even out the constituencies, since there’s currently a big variation in numbers.

For instance, Na h-Eileanan an Iar, in the Outer Hebrides has 22,000 voters while the Isle of Wight has 111,000.

A flaw in the plan is that smaller regions like Wales would lose a disproportionate number of MPs under the proposals.

Election expert and Tory peer explained: “A full boundary review has already been carried out an is ready to go, barring a legal dispute in Northern Island which is still to be resolved.

“The Government now has to decide whether to implement the existing recommendations or start a completely new review.”

Lucy Skoulding is a freelance reporter at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

15 Responses to “Tories accused of rigging democracy ahead of boundary changes”

  1. nhsgp

    It’s a change that the Tories have been plotting for a while, claiming that the exisiting electoral boundaries are unfairly biased towards Labour.
    The electoral commission is also clear. There is a bias to Labour. The law is that the bias shall be removed.

  2. Joe

    Parliamentary constituencies have always been adjusted according to demographic changes. It should be automatic and not require any political action.

    This is just part of our democratic process.

  3. Cole

    The whole thing should be done independently (to reflect demographic changes). The last thing we need is politicians trying to gerrymander.

  4. Francis McGonigal

    Rather than arguing about boundaries Labour should finally embrace a more proportional voting system.
    A multi-member constituency would then have more or fewer MPs as the size of its population rose or fell over time. There would be no need to change boundaries.

Comments are closed.