Analysis: Right-wing think tank’s plans would benefit rich and encourage climate chaos

So-called Taxpayers' Alliance report proposals would 'benefit the wealthiest most damage the environment' according to the IPPR.

A new report by the secretively-funded Taxpayers’ Alliance (TPA) would be a disaster for social justice and the climate, progressives have warned.

The TPA’s report on a No Deal Brexit calls for drastic cuts to air passenger duty and huge extensions in tax relief on corporations.

Climate researchers DeSmog describe the TPA as part of the network of right wing think tanks which occupy 55 Tufton Street, alongside climate science denial think tanks such as The Global Warming Policy Foundation.

The organisation – known for proposing ‘right-wing‘ policies on tax – call for the ‘long term’ abolition of air passenger duty – at a time when the air travel is the world’s fastest growing source of greenhouse gases which cause climate change.

Globally the world’s 16,000 commercial jet aircraft generate more than 600 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, and the aviation industry is currently failing to meet even its own conservative reduction targets.

Carys Roberts, IPPR Chief Economist and Head of the Centre for Economic Justice, said:

“The TPA are proposing tax cuts that would give £40bn in handouts to the wealthiest while failing to help the most vulnerable. This is a vision of a divided country, not a strengthened economy.

These proposals would disproportionately benefit the rich. Our figures show the 15 per cent income tax proposal would put far more cash in wealthy families’ pockets than those on low incomes. The evidence shows that cuts to stamp duty tend to push up prices, benefitting those selling expensive properties. And business rate cuts are less likely to reduce the price of a cup of coffee than they are to increase rents paid to landlords.

These proposals for long-term tax cuts are an ideological drive for a permanent-austerity, low tax economy, not an evidence-based rescue plan in the event of an economic shock.

Instead, we should be preparing ‘shovel-ready’ projects and getting ready to boost investment given that a recession could be around the corner – for a steady economy in the short-run and strong economy in the long-run.”

The IPPR say reducing the basic rate of income tax to 15% would benefit wealthier families more than low-income families as both a proportion of their income and in absolute terms.

That’s because earners above the higher-rate threshold would receive a tax cut on all of their income between £12.5k and £50k, whereas everyone else would receive the percentage cut on a lower amount of income, or not at all for those below the basic rate threshold. The distributional impact is demonstrated below:

Income Tax distribution.gif

Analysis uing IPPR Tax-Benefit Model using Family Resources Survey 2017/18 (DWP)

The Chief Executive of the Committee on Climate Change, Chris Stark, has previously called on the Scottish Government to drop it’s proposals to reduce APD because of the impact that it would have in increasing emissions from aviation. 

John McDonnell MP, Labour’s Shadow Chancellor, said:

“This shows the real agenda of the Tories’ No Deal Brexit plans. Having spent nine years ripping apart our public services and social fabric, the Tories and their friends now want to take billions more out of our services and put them in the pockets of the rich.

“We must do everything in our power to stop a No Deal Brexit, which would put at risk our vital public services like the NHS.”

Luke Murphy, Associate Director and Head of IPPR’s Environmental Justice Commission, said:

“In the face of a climate emergency, it’s completely foolish to cut and then abolish Air Passenger Duty (APD) which will lead to an increase in aviation emissions. It’s the rich who would benefit most from cuts to APD: just 15 per cent of the population take 70 per cent of flights and having an income over £115k or a second home are the strongest predictors of being a frequent flyer.

“When we need to be spending at least an additional £25 billion a year to tackle the climate and environmental crises, a tax cut which will disproportionately benefit the wealthy, is also deeply irresponsible.”

Last November the Guardian revealed that the TPA received at least $286,000 (£223,300) from US-based donors in the last five years – ‘including $100,000 from a billionaire-founded religious trust incorporated in the Bahamas’.

The organisation has also been campaigning against clean air zones across the UK, which have been described as ‘essential‘ in dealing with illegal pollution levels.

 Scott Ainslie, Green MEP for London, told Left Foot Forward:

“This is typical of the TPA. Just as thousands take to the streets of our capital to highlight the government’s failure to act on the climate emergency, they produce this proposal to cause more environmental destruction.

“By advocating the abolition of air passenger duty, it is clear that the TPA completely fails to understand the dire situation facing our planet. We need a more progressive tax on flights – the biggest polluter in the transport sector. At present, 70% of flights are taken by 15% of our country’s population…

“We could use the revenue from the carbon tax to improve and expand our railway network and local transport services. That is real climate action.”

See also: Taxpayers Alliance takes campaign against clean air to Bath

Josiah Mortimer is Editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

7 Responses to “Analysis: Right-wing think tank’s plans would benefit rich and encourage climate chaos”

  1. Patrick Newman

    You should not be so hard on these semi-educated staffers for the usual suspects – TPA, ASI, IEA. They are just trying to earn a good crust protecting and promoting the interests of the corporate fat cats and assorted billionaires. Perhaps their philosophy is trickle-down but as we all know if you lick the arses of the ultra-wealthy the resulting trickle-down cannot be spent will need clearing up!

  2. Eric Walker

    I have for long wanted to start an org called ‘The Real Taxpayers Alliance’ to counter this rich man’s org. Anyone interested to collaborate?

  3. Dave Roberts

    There are rumours that bears are defecating in rural situations.

  4. grosir songkok president

    your article is very good and easy to understand, hopefully the blog will be more successful

  5. Tom Sacold

    It would be good to have a well reasoned socialist response to TPA ideas on LLF. Unfortunately we get this nonsense.

  6. Cole

    I wonder if Sacold is a provocateur who works for the TPA.

  7. Gary

    ‘Think Tanks’ are a useful device. Business interests and wealthy British and foreign individuals fund them to do their bidding, they come up with the ‘academic reports’ that their masters require and then fund directly and indirectly politicians and their parties. A nice legal conduit for illegal contributions.

    But no one will say anything. Why? Because they’re ALL at it. Like ‘Battle Buses’ it was an unspoken thing, no party would raise it because they were doing exactly the same thing. In THAT case it was up to Ch4 to actually investigate it. When will the ‘Think Tank’ bubble burst – who will investigate their activities? MPs destined for high office who are ‘inconvenienced’ by losing their seats are employed (or at least given a wage) by them. That keeps them ticking over to the next GE. In the meantime they are reminded who they REALLY work for.

    Sadly some of these Think Tanks are even more sinister, ‘government funding’ from departments that don’t exist, carrying out shady work for shady people all given the respectability of a ‘Think Tank’ monicker…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.