Economic crime: How the Tories are leaving foxes in charge of the hen house

Efforts to tackle fraud, corruption and money laundering could fall victim to corporate capture, argues Prof Prem Sikka.

Last week the government released the first minutes from the Economic Crime Strategic Board (ECSB) – a new body set up to combat economic crime. They do not bode well for those with hopes that corruption and fraud will be held to account.  

Legacy of light-touch regulation

Let’s start from basics: the UK has become a central node in the international network of dirty money relating to tax avoidance/evasion, bribery, corruption, narcotics, human trafficking, organ smuggling and gang warfare. The official estimates are that around £100bn is laundered each year though the UK’s financial system. The process is aided by banks, accountants, lawyers, estate agents, art dealers and other intermediaries.

There are already 25 overlapping regulatory bodies dealing with money laundering. In this regulatory maze, for the period 2012-13 to 2017-18 there were 55 investigations for breaches of the UK’s Money Laundering Regulations and 25 prosecutions were brought.

the appeasement of corporate elites by governments has yielded disastrous outcomes, but continues unabated. The light-touch regulation of banks by regulatory bodies dominated by corporate grandees paved the way for the 2007-08 financial crash.

Malpractices in the financial services sector have continued as evidenced by the rigging of exchange rates, interest rates, abuse of small businesses and audacious frauds. Some banks are suspected of forging customers’ signatures to bankrupt individuals and businesses and repossess their assets. This has fuelled corporate profits and executive bonuses.

The same disastrous regulatory model has been applied to the auditing industry and with very predictable results. Accounting firms continue to deliver dud audits whilst their partners continue to collect megabucks. Big accounting firms also have a history of profiting from tax avoidance/evasion, bribery, corruption and money laundering, but face virtually no investigations or penalties in the UK.

Behind the Board

There are no places on the board for trade unions, civil society organisations or victims of economic crimes who can bring diverse perspectives on the problems and issues.

Instead, the board includes CEOs and chief executives from Barclays, Lloyds and Santander, as well as senior representatives from UK Finance, the National Crime Agency (NCA) and the Solicitors Regulation Authority, Accountants Affinity Group and National Association of Estate Agents.

The first board meeting of ECSB was attended by representatives of Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), Santander, Morgan Stanley, Standard Chartered, Nationwide and representatives of estate agents, accountancy and law firms.

Enrolling ‘experts’

Here is a small sample of practices that have been seen among some of the businesses populating the ECSB.

Barclays and RBS were part of a cartel fined €1bn by EU for rigging foreign exchange market. The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority fined Barclays £284m for engaging in “collusive behaviour” with others to fix exchange rates.

RBS’ treatment of small business customers in its Global Restructuring Group (GRG) has long been under scrutiny. In February 2018, the House of Commons Treasury Committee released a previously unpublished regulatory report, with findings they branded ‘disgraceful’:

“The overarching priority at all levels of GRG was not the health and strength of customers, but the generation of income for RBS, through made-up fees, high interest rates, and the acquisition of equity and property”.

In 2016, the European Commission fined HSBC for €485m for rigging the key European benchmark interest rate. In 2012, US fined HSBC $1.9bn for practices that allowed terrorists and narcotics traffickers to move billions around the financial system. By paying the fine, HSBC avoided prosecution which could have resulted in loss of its US banking licence and closure. The US revelations did not result in any investigations in the UK, but then-Chancellor George Osborne privately urged US regulators to go easy of the bank, as it was too big to fail.

Just last year Santander was fined £32m for keeping dead customers’ money meant for beneficiaries. Some 40,428 customers were affected. Santander failed to disclose information relating to the issues with the probate and bereavement process to the UK regulator.

In December, Morgan Stanley was fined $10m for anti-money laundering failures, while this year UK and US regulators jointly levied a fine of $1.1bn on Standard Chartered for sanctions busting and money laundering.

The NCA routinely complains that law firms fail to report incidences of money laundering. Too many accountants are complicit in money laundering, but face little/no sanctions because they are regulated by their own trade associations. The Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision, one of the money laundering regulators, concluded that:

 “The accountancy sector and many smaller professional bodies focus more on representing their members rather than robustly supervising standards. Partly because they don’t believe – or don’t want to believe – that there is any money laundering in their sector. Partly because they believe that their memberships will walk if they come under scrutiny”.

Yet, through its membership of the ECSB, the accountancy industry and banks are able to make rules on money laundering.

The ECSB is destined to fail if inconvenient truths like these continue to be swept under the carpet. Corporate capture is a key problem behind all regulatory failures. Sadly though, the UK government appears committed to perpetuating a failed model of regulation.

See also: Rotten audits are enriching accountancy firms and their partners

Prem Sikka is a Professor of Accounting at University of Sheffield, and Emeritus Professor of Accounting at University of Essex. He is a Contributing Editor for Left Foot Forward and tweets here.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

8 Responses to “Economic crime: How the Tories are leaving foxes in charge of the hen house”

  1. Dave Roberts

    May I refer Mr Sikka to my previous comments about how easy it is to start a UK company. If he needs further guidance I am available to advise him. He only has to ask as he seems somewhat naive in the matter of company law.

  2. Chester Draws

    The ECSB is destined to fail if inconvenient truths like these continue to be swept under the carpet.

    You mean all the highly publicised prosecutions with huge fines? That’s some poor quality sweeping there!

    London is a major centre of global finance precisely because it is cleaner than most of the others. If they merely wanted lighter regulation, then they could do their business in Panama or Nigeria.

    Let’s start from basics: the UK has become a central node in the international network of dirty money relating to tax avoidance/evasion, bribery, corruption, narcotics, human trafficking, organ smuggling and gang warfare.

    Tax avoidance isn’t illegal. The rest of them are not a “network”, unless you are a conspiracy nut.

    But the real problem is that you guys are seriously innumerate. The £100bn estimated as laundered sounds “ooooh, scary”. But is nothing as compared to the an average daily turnover of US$1.85 trillion in foreign exchange transactions. So that’s 0.0003% of the flow is illegally obtained. Colour me unimpressed.

  3. Tom Sacold

    We are subject to EU law on company accounting and governance.

    We can only move to a socialist structure of control, ownership and regulation by leaving the EU !!!

  4. Julia Gibb

    It was because we were under EU governance that Brexit was funded by the super rich.
    The loop holes were being closed. The tax havens being threatened.

    Brexit will be a green light to the greedy! Only a fool would expect better control from a UK structure. We have hundreds of years of evidence to demonstrate London Rules will be for the elite

  5. Tom Sacold

    The EU works in the interests of the multinational corporations based in the EU. It facilitates tax avoidance and tax planning by the wealthy and multinational corporations. It does not work in the interests of european workers.


    Like note shipshape and bristol fashion offers because of win.

  7. Tom Sacold

    The pro-EU Labour Blairites promoted ‘light touch’ regulation from almost day one of their government. The result was the inevitable capitalist crash of 2008.

  8. Julia Gibb

    When those with extreme wealth and power pour millions into the Brexit campaign.
    When people like Boris, Trump, Farage, Fox etc are demanding we leave the EU.
    Pause for a moment and think WHY!
    Do you really think the Rightwing have your interests at heart?
    Study the alignment. Those on the Left who have valid points of discussion regarding the EU are being used to deliver a Right Wing American Union.

    Don’t be fooled again.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.