Theresa May is being disingenuous on Scotland – and voters will punish her for it

Like David Cameron, Theresa May is putting the union at risk


Theresa May’s reckless announcement of a general election represents one of the single biggest threats  to the unity of the United Kingdom since David Cameron’s 2015 General Election campaign.

Back then, Cameron’s efforts to warn of the dangers of an SNP/Labour alliance running the UK might have won him an election, but painted Scotland has an almost foreign land which should not be given any opportunity to have a say in how the UK as a whole is governed.

Now, we have the prospect of a general election which, for at least two parts of the UK, will be about whether they want to stay in Theresa May’s Brexit Britain.

Although its MPs will abstain in today’s Commons vote on whether to support the calling of a general election, the SNP are licking their lips at the prospect of making this election, across Scotland, about a choice between  remaining in Brexit Britain or the opportunity of an independent Scotland within the EU.

In its leader column this morning, the Scotsman declares that the calling of an election is a ‘bold and brave’ strategy for the prime minister, but agrees that she ‘does require a mandate if she is to make progress on Brexit’. It warns however against her conflating this with issues around a second independence vote in Scotland.  It explains:

“Where we take issue with her, however, is over calling a snap election to seek a mandate for Brexit, then telling Scotland that the same election – where people cast the same vote as everywhere else in the UK – is to be about Scottish independence. Remember the repeated assurances in 2014 that Scotland is an integral part of the UK with the same say as all other parts? Those ring hollow today.

“The same can be said of Mrs May’s argument that a referendum in 2018 or 2019 would be too early for Scots to make an informed choice on their future, when we are then given a matter of a few weeks to have our say on Brexit via the general election.

“Her tactic of turning a Brexit vote into an independence poll is also disrespectful to the one million voters in Scotland who voted to leave the EU, and want to see their wishes carried out, but are now being told the chance they have to endorse it is to take second place to the issue of Scottish independence.

“If the Prime Minister wants an answer on independence, then she should ask that question when the time is right, and not confuse two issues which are too important to Scotland’s future to be treated in this way.”

The Labour supporting Daily Record however goes much further, declaring a snap election to be ‘nothing more than an opportunistic power grab’, and a ‘belated attempt to shore up support before the going gets really tough in the turmoil of quitting Europe.’

The paper goes on to warn that voters in Scotland are ‘tired of listening to the same old arguments and will have little enthusiasm for another trek to the polling booths.’

Meanwhile, in Northern Ireland, the campaign will take place against a backdrop of the parties seeking agreement on a new power sharing executive following last month’s elections to Stormont in the wake of the Renewable Heat Incentive saga.

That Northern Ireland Secretary, James Brokenshire’s argument that the talks can go on as normal as the parties are in engaged in an election over Northern Ireland’s constitutional future is bizarre to say the least.  It is perhaps the understatement of the year to argue, as the Irish Foreign Minister, Charlie Flanagan that a general election complicates the ‘fragile’ talks taking place in Belfast.

The Irish Times today declares that the election comes at a ‘bad time’ for Northern Ireland. It continues:

“There is little expectation that deadlocked talks between Sinn Féin and the DUP can make any progress ahead of the election and a deadline already extended until early May. No party will want to be seen to be ‘weakening’ ahead of polls which might see Sinn Féin bringing nationalists level with unionists.”

Writing for the Belfast Telegraph, its columnist, Ed Curran meanwhile game plays the likely picture in Northern Ireland during the election.  He writes:

“A winner-takes-all contest in each of Northern Ireland’s 18 constituencies encourages block voting within unionism and nationalism and leaves the smaller parties in a political no-man’s-land.

“Theresa May, like Edward Heath in 1974 and Tony Blair in 2001, has handed the big battalions a political lifeline.

“Instead of the ignominy of failure in the current talks at Stormont, the Democratic Unionists and Sinn Fein can look forward to a win-win general election in which they could wipe out middle-ground opposition perhaps once and for all.”

He continues:

“Mrs May said yesterday that the only way to “guarantee certainty and stability in the years ahead is to hold this election”.

“That may be so for the rest of the UK, but the likelihood is that the poll on June 8 will not guarantee certainty nor stability for Northern Ireland. More worryingly for her in the future, the outcome of the forthcoming election may do the very opposite.”

‘History teaches us that general elections held at awkward times for Northern Ireland have the capacity to make matters worse,’ Curran writes.

This election may make things worse elsewhere as well.

Ed Jacobs is a contributing editor at Left Foot Forward

See also: In Scotland, how long is a generation?

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

6 Responses to “Theresa May is being disingenuous on Scotland – and voters will punish her for it”

  1. Michael WALKER

    Voters will punish Mrs May..

    They have already..
    “Tories take a 24% lead with YouGov. Can they poll 50% and above?”

  2. patrick newman

    Mrs May has the starring role in “Oh what a lovely Brexit”. What a relief while we are handing Mrs May a solid majority for five years we can forget about the raging crises in schools and colleges, social services, NHS, police, prisons, not to mention the developing fragmentation of the Union. We are going to have an election about leaving the EU, whatever that means. Obviously May is not a multitasker!

  3. Derick Tulloch

    The debate in Scotland yesterday was whether or not to use a majority of Scottish SNP seats in the May election for a direct move to independence or not. Which would be 30 or more out of 79.

    The SNP leadership has, so far, come down on the side of an SNP majority as re-affirming the Scottish Parliament majority vote to have a second referendum before Brexit takes place.

    If that referendum is refused then the only future option would be the parliamentary route. Mrs May and Ms Davidson should be careful what they wish for.

  4. Glesga

    The SNP are only interested in independence. Brexit is an excuse for them. The SNP totally ignore the two million that voted to remain in the Union. The Unionists will vote to remain if the SNP really have the bottle to calll a referendum.

  5. uglyfatbloke

    For pity’s sake Glesca, give it a rest.

  6. uglyfatbloke

    May won’t be punished for being disingenuous; she’ll make gains in Scotland. Scottish Labour will effectively campaign to help put Tories in for the sake of getting nats out and thus help to increase May’s majority. Clever or what?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.