Party calls amendment a 'red line'
Liberal Democrat peers have pledged to vote against the Brexit Bill unless their cross-party amendment on holding a second referendum on a future Brexit deal is approved, calling this a ‘red line’ for the party.
Dick Newby, Lib Dem leader in the House of Lords, said:
“The Brexit deal will define the future direction of our country for generations. The people decided to initiate the Brexit process. Only they can legitimise its outcome.
For the Liberal Democrats this is a red line.
Theresa May should listen for once in her life. She must either give the people democracy or expect further votes on the Bill.”
The cross-party amendment is signed by Labour Lord Peter Hain, Tory Baroness Wheatcroft, Lib Dem Lord Newby, and former independent (formerly Labour) Lord Warner.
The full text reads:
Page 1, line 10, at end insert—
( ) No agreement with the European Union consequent on the use of the power under subsection (1) may be ratified unless it has been approved by a national referendum.
Lib Dem leader Tim Farron said:
“Voting for a departure is not the same as voting for a destination. The government must give a voice to the people over the final deal.
We will not give up fighting for the rights of the people of this country to have a say. Anything short of that is unfair, unaccountable and undemocratic.
If the government do not accept this principle, Liberal Democrats will keep marching through the voting lobbies to support it.”
UPDATE: The motion was defeated in the Lords by 336 votes to 131, a majority of 205.
Farron confirmed the more than 100 Lib Dem Lords would now vote against the Brexit Bill, adding:
Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today.
“We are confident, increasingly, that we are right on this and that public opinion will shift in our direction, and we will continue arguing for it. […]
Surely the Prime Minister needs to know that we will not accept her coming back with a dreadful deal and offering us the chance to play Russian roulette with five barrels or Russian roulette with six barrels. That is not a choice.”