The bill, agreed by parliament this week, is an attack on the public's right to know
This week the Investigatory Powers Bill – or Snoopers’ Charter – was agreed by parliament.
The NUJ has campaigned against this unjustified and draconian legislation because it allows the secret, state surveillance of journalists, whistleblowers and sources. This legislation is an attack on democracy and on the public’s right to know.
The government has argued the bill is about dealing with national security and serious crime but what they have actually done is use terrorism as an excuse to give themselves new powers to spy on journalists.
The state’s powers of surveillance are vast. They include the interception of communications and the authorities can listen to telephone calls and read emails. They can also access computers or mobile devises regardless of encryption and items stored can be altered or deleted. They can access documents, diaries, contact books, photographs, messaging chat logs, and GPS location records. They have the power to access all internet browsing histories and what is typed into a device, including login details and passwords. Draft documents and deleted files can also be accessed and the microphone, webcam or GPS-based locators can be turned on.
The Investigatory Powers Bill provides a new legal framework that allows the state to collect and sift through all of this information in order to target, identify and access journalistic sources and whistleblowers.
Previously the authorities had to follow special legal procedures requiring them to contact a journalist or media organisation if the police wanted to get hold of their photographs, footage or notebooks. With these requests came the opportunity to know what the state wanted and then challenge the authorities in court. Using this procedure has enabled NUJ members to fight and win the right to protect their work, integrity and sources.
Now the government thinks this procedure is out of date. Ministers have argued that information held on mobile phones and electronic devices belongs to the service provider and not the individual or organisation that pays the bill. This means the authorities will now bypass journalists when they want to access electronic data and information.
If journalists don’t know their work and their sources are being compromised then it becomes practically impossible to uphold our ethical principle to protect sources and whistleblowers.
The lack of protection for sources has an impact on journalists working in war zones or those investigating organised crime or state misconduct. The lack of protections in law make journalists less safe – if a journalist is perceived as informers to the authorities, or as future witnesses in a trial, then they can become a target.
The Investigatory Powers Bill damages quality journalism and investigative reporting in the public interest. It enables unjustified, secret, state interference in the press. The union won some changes to the legislation during the debates in parliament but the changes simply don’t go far enough.
The extremely intrusive and unnecessary surveillance powers contained within the Investigatory Powers Bill trample over the very principles of journalism.
Our campaign doesn’t stop here, we will continue to stick to our principle of protecting journalistic sources and we will challenge this new law in every way possible.
Michelle Stanistreet is general secretary of the NUJ
See also: Theresa May’s Snoopers’ Charter is a ‘death sentence’ for investigative journalism
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
4 Responses to “Investigatory Powers Bill: Spying on journalists undermines democracy”
GodfreyR
In a world where there is the constant threat of islamic terrorism we need a strong set of security laws and processes.
Oblong
If a journalist is known as a government informant, they can be a target??
The criminals won’t be privy. Sounds like more excuses to protect them. How dare they have their criminality hacked!
Iynne
The facts that democracy stands for did change? Then what changes? Looks like some one wants to be in control.
Andrew Hennager
If you’re a journalist or whistleblower there is the option of buying a pay-as-you go dongle from a shop in cash, and topping it up in cash. Also use tor or another proxy. Useful guide in the canary: http://www.thecanary.co/2016/10/12/dont-snowden-know-blog-securely-simple-guide/