As Obama leaves the White House, the world needs a climate leader
Credit: NASA/Kathryn Hansen
It is now ‘very likely’ that 2016 will be the hottest year on record, according to the World Meteorological Organisation, whose preliminary data suggests temperatures of approximately 1.2° Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
This means that 16 of the 17 hottest years will have been in this century, with 2015 and 2016 as back-to-back record-breakers.
While the news was bad last year, the negotiation of the Paris Agreement — a deal with unprecedented international support — gave some cause for optimism. Both China and the US were finally taking major strides, largely thanks to Barack Obama’s decision to make climate change mitigation a central plank of his second term.
Now, the world is even hotter and a climate change denier is about to take over the White House. Donald Trump has already appointed ‘climate criminal‘ Myron Ebell to lead the rollback of the Environmental Protection Agency, and is reportedly seeking quick ways to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement.
However, as Leah Davis of the Green Alliance wrote last week, ‘the US-sized hole can be filled’ if an existing climate leader is willing to step forward and offer ‘strong climate diplomacy’.
She continued:
“The UK could see this as a major opportunity. In the light of Brexit it will need to be increasingly outward looking, and it has a long and strong track record on which it could build. It was the first country to set a legally binding goal for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the first to announce a date to end unabated coal and the first to establish an investment bank dedicated to the green economy.”
There are lots of good reasons for the UK to position itself as a climate leader, from the jobs created by green energy to the investment it could unlock. Moreover, it would clearly demonstrate that post-Brexit Britain is an outward-looking, innovative and responsible global player.
However, the early signs are not promising. While Theresa May has voiced some support for climate action, her decision to scrap the Department for Energy and Climate Change suggests that environmental issues are not a priority, as does her government’s sluggish progress towards ratification of the Paris Agreement.
That said, this generation of Tories is not fundamentally climate-sceptical, and they have been lazy on climate action rather than actively averse to change.
Hopefully the election of Trump — who believes that global warming is a Chinese hoax — will shake them out of their stupor.
Niamh Ní Mhaoileoin is editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
8 Responses to “2016 is the hottest year on record and Trump is about to be president – the UK must step up”
Jonathan Hampshire
What Trump and co need is something radical, bold and unexpected coming at them from out of leftfield. They will have anticipated and prepared for the international criticism and the battle with internal climate activists. I think it highly unlikely they are prepared for people from countries all over the world taking it upon themselves to boycott some of the big US corporations – it may just get them on the ropes and could be a game changer.
Those of us who worry and care about climate change don’t really like conflict, much prefer to work in co-operation with others, look to find common ground, want to be reasonable and play fair. Anyone thinking that approach is going to work with Trump and co needs to get off their unicorn.
The gloves need to come off and the fight taken to Trump. Trump didn’t realise his revolution through nice words and fair play, and any counter revolution won’t achieve results by those methods. There will be those who will claim that it’s unfair to target the US; after all, it’s not as if other countries are doing what needs to be done on climate. Tough! It’s fair enough! The US is about to become climate enemy number one and they need to be dealt with before the contagion spreads.
A boycott can also serve as a warning to other countries who decide their short
Mick
It’s not so much citizens boycotting US corporations but governments doing it, which makes the difference.
And they won’t. So much vital international trade and politics are interwoven. It won’t be overturned because we’re being told we’re frying to death. Need to be told, do we.
Get over that. Boycott all the coffee houses and products you like. It will only put Americans on the welfare line and make things all the worse.
Poor little left. People have to eat.
Anon
There are actually people on this site who believe that they can stop the ‘climate changing’.
If that was not insane enough, they also believe that they are going to improve the environment of this planet by removing the one gas that is necessary for flora and fauna to survive.
Unbelievable.