Labour shouldn’t fall into the Leave campaign’s trap on immigration

EU immigration fears are unfounded and we shouldn't pander to them, writes Richard Corbett MEP

 

There have been recent pleas for Labour to heed the results of the referendum by henceforth opposing free movement in Europe, regardless of its benefits.

This proposal has many pitfalls. At worst, it is tantamount to saying ‘we know immigration is broadly positive, but because people mistakenly believe it isn’t (and this is exploited by racists), we should formulate a policy based on those mistaken beliefs rather than on the evidence’.

Moreover, even if you are convinced of the need to limit migration, doing so as a knee-jerk response to the EU referendum result falls into precisely the trap set by the Leave campaign in the referendum, which was to blame the problem entirely on our European agreements.

Let’s not forget that most migrants in Britain have come from outside the EU, entirely under British rules, nothing to do with the EU. It was the Tories’ failure to meet their own target of cutting migration to the tens of thousands per year, even where they controlled the levers, that led them to deflect blame onto Europe.

Meanwhile, EU migration is two-way, with large numbers of Brits in other EU countries partly balancing the numbers of other EU citizens here. Those here pay one third more in tax than they take in benefits. Brits abroad are often retired, using the Spanish and French health services and relieving pressure on ours.

So, in general, it’s not EU free movement that’s the problem, though there are specific issues which we could deal with better if we chose to: directing part of the Treasury surplus from EU migrants to areas where public services are under pressure, properly enforcing the living wage, clamping down on employers who don’t advertise locally, and much more.

But above all, what is the price that we would have to pay to end EU (and EEA) free movement? Other EU countries are telling us that we’re welcome to stay in the single European market, provided we play by the same rules as everybody else in that market.

Free movement of goods, services and capital comes with free movement of labour. Without it, we can’t be a part of the single market. We would only have access to our main export market as an outsider, with the regulatory burdens, red tape for our companies, and costly tariffs that that entails.

How much economic damage are we willing to take? And to what avail?

After all, if ending free movement cuts even by half the net numbers coming to Britain, this would mean just 0.14 per cent of the population, as recently pointed out in a blog post entitled ‘Is 0.14 per cent of the population really more important than the economy?’.

Are we really going to damage our manufacturing sector, lose inward investment, erode our tax base (vital for financing public services and investment), lose a big chunk of the City, and make life more difficult for many Brits living abroad — all to pander to a few prejudices that we fully admit are unfounded?

Richard Corbett is deputy leader of the Labour MEPs and represents Yorkshire & Humber

See also: The EU won’t play ball on freedom of movement – just ask the Swiss

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

12 Responses to “Labour shouldn’t fall into the Leave campaign’s trap on immigration”

  1. CR

    All immigration into the UK should be controlled/managed to fit our economic needs.

    Uncontrolled immigraiton has been a cause of many of our major econonomic and social problems.

  2. Martin Clarke

    If Labour try to fight the next election with Richard Corbett’s “self righteous/we know better than you/you’re racist” policy on immigration, they will get annihilated but UKIP in the north east and by the Tories everywhere else outside of London.

  3. wg

    The “living wage”, like the minimum wage before it, is a low bar that encourages poorer EU workers and discourages UK workers. But that is the nature of our welfare system.

    And surely “clamping down on employers who don’t advertise locally” is in contravention of the EU’s rules on contracts and tenders.

    For all tenders, public authorities:
    1. may not discriminate against a business because it is registered in another EU country

    I do not understand why a Labour MEP is so pedantic about immigration being a red line issue – isn’t Mr Corbett meant to be representing the people of the UK.

  4. Alex from Carlisle

    0.14 % of the population is it worth it

    Typical Labour. The folk in Boston, Spalding, Peterborough etc should just deal with it so the metro liberals don’t have to suffer.

    #hardbrexitnow

  5. George Laird

    “Labour shouldn’t fall into the Leave campaign’s trap on immigration”

    I think that the headline should be changed to reflect the position in more stark terms.

    Middle class university educated employed Labour members shouldn’t fall into the Leave campaign’s trap by supporting unemployed working class people left destitute with no hope of jobs, housing, social mobility and have plenty of opportunity to experience welfare benefit sanctions because of uncontrolled immigration in the UK.

Comments are closed.