Government continues assault on trade union finances

TUC reports that every pound spent on facility time saves taxpayers £2.31


As the Trade Union Bill continues through committee stage in the House of Lords today, peers will debate amendments relating to deduction of union subscriptions from wages in the public sector, and facility time for union representatives.

Currently public sector workers have their union subscriptions automatically deducted from their pay cheques, known as the ‘check-off’ system. In a statement the government said it was ‘no longer appropriate’ for it to act as an intermediary for these payments to unions, and the system is due to be cancelled at the end of April.

Would-be union members will now have to arrange their own subscriptions, which unions say will lead to a loss in sign-ups and funding and is part of a government assault on their finances.

This afternoon the Lords will also be debating government plans to impose a cap on facility time in the public sector. Facility time is paid time off for union representatives to carry out trade union duties, and has been a statutory right since 1975.

Conservative hostility to facility time has been growing for years, with careful descriptions put forward of ‘seaside conferences‘ and ‘non-jobs‘ which seem to waste taxpayers’ money.

Unions have described the move to cap facility time as an attack on workers’ rights, but new research published today suggests that it may also cost money.

According to a report by the TUC, based on new analysis of figures from the University of Bradford, facility time improves staff retention, reduces illness and boosts industrial relations.

The analysis reveals that in the health sector staff turnover is almost three times lower in workplaces with union representatives than in workplaces without, leading to a recruitment costs saving of more than £66m a year for the NHS alone.

It suggests that for every £1 spent on paid time off for public sector union reps to represent their members, taxpayers get at least £2.31 back in savings.

The report’s author Gregor Gall, Professor of Industrial Relations at the University of Bradford, said:

“This research lays to bed the myth that facility time is out of control and a drain on public resources. It delivers clear cost benefits and is good for both employers and employees.”

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

4 Responses to “Government continues assault on trade union finances”

  1. Peter Nelson

    This is wholy vindictive and serves no purpose other than attempts to weaken organised labour.

  2. Paul Bale

    The Tories are doing all they can to give Labour any chance of winning the next election and this is just one of them. Along with lies to distort the facts. I once had a union that was destroyed by Thatcher and I miss the strength it gave me in all dealings with bosses or disputes with fellow workers.
    Why I wonder why the Tories are not being so scrupulous about the fortunes that disappear into their own pockets to help ruin this country.

  3. Why did the Lords reject trade union reforms? | Left Foot Forward

    […] hostility to facility time in the public sector has been brewing for many years, centred on the idea that sending union reps […]

  4. Why did the Lords reject trade union reforms? | Flex Buy All

    […] hostility to facility time in the public sector has been brewing for many years, centred on the idea that sending union reps […]

Comments are closed.