10 years on, Cameron’s compassionate Conservativism has failed to deliver its promises

The Legatum Institute's annual Prosperity Index reveals where the UK is falling behind its OECD neighbours


This weekend marked ten years since David Cameron became the leader of the Conservative party. In 2005 he presented his vision of ‘compassionate Conservatism’ and promised great things for Britain. But ten years on, many of these promises have failed to materialise.

Each year, think tank The Legatum Institute releases a ‘Prosperity Index’, ranking the prosperity of countries based on both income and wellbeing. A look at this year’s Index highlights exactly where Cameron has failed.

At the Conservative Conference in 2005, Cameron vowed to fix Britain’s ‘dumbed down education system’. However, in this year’s Prosperity Index Britain has dropped five ranks in education to 25th, falling below countries such as Ireland (8th), Slovakia (14th) and Spain (19th).

On education Britain also ranked behind 70 per cent of its OECD peers. While raising the school leaving age has improved enrolment, the quality of education still needs work to improve the UK’s international competitiveness – as shown by the UK’s poor performance in the PISA rankings.

The UK is dragged down by its poor teacher to child ratio, which is in part, due to the government’s inability to tackle a shortage of teachers. Estelle Morris argued in the Guardian that the government’s continued tendency to hand over ‘freedom’ combined with ever greater ‘tightening of the accountability framework’ has put too much pressure on teachers.

Cameron also argued in 2005 that the Labour government had left the NHS ‘demoralised’, and promised to fix it. Our Prosperity Index, however, shows that health has stagnated under Cameron and the UK has fallen to 20th this year (behind half its OECD peers).

The UK also falls within the bottom 30 per cent of OECD countries in terms of healthy life expectancy. One key area of concern, which was highlighted by MacMillan Cancer Support, is that cancer survival rates lag well behind other European countries – in fact, the survival rates seen in the UK now are the same as those achieved by other European countries over a decade ago.

Moreover, the government’s efforts to address this issue have been criticised by the Public Accounts Committee, who said that there has been a loss of momentum over the last two years. Thus, despite recent increases in the NHS budget, the UK health system needs a lot more work to make Britons as healthy as our OECD counterparts.

This time ten years ago Cameron said he would make Britain safer. The new ‘compassionate Conservativism’ approach to crime was highlighted in his infamous ‘hug a hoodie’ speech in 2005. But mass riots across the country in his first term as prime minister undermined his description of the ‘defensive’ youth. More recently there has been an obvious change of tactic.

Cameron’s former speechwriter, Danny Kruger, noted how his softer approach to crime seems all but lost under rhetoric of ‘bashing burglars and sending immigrants home’. However, the UK still does badly in Safety and Security in the Prosperity Index, coming 23rd and ranking behind 60 per cent of OECD countries.

A phrase repeated by Cameron in 2005 was: ‘There is such a thing as society. It’s just not the same thing as the state.’ This was a clear and conscious departure from Thatcher’s claim that there is no such thing as society and was designed to shed the Conservatives’ ‘nasty’ image.

It formed the basis of Cameron’s vision of the ‘Big Society’ and his plan to allow the ‘voluntary sector and social enterprise to deal’ with social problems. However, in the Prosperity Index, the last Labour government left Britain just outside the global top ten for social capital in 2010; after five years under Cameron this has not improved. The Big Society has failed to deliver.

Something that Cameron did not predict in 2005 was the very thing that has come to define his premiership – the 2010 economic crisis. The Prosperity Index shows that, economically, Cameron has done well. Even though many of the chancellor’s goals of deficit reduction have slipped, the UK ranks 18th in the Index and is in the top half of OECD countries.

This is even more impressive given that in the wake of the crisis the UK nearly dropped out of the top 30. However, Cameron’s ‘austerity is the only option narrative has put cuts before anything else. In 2010 The New York Times warned that the level of cuts pursued by Cameron could ‘hobble public services [and] strain poor families’ budgets’.

This looks like a fairly accurate prediction, given that improvement in the economy has not translated into greater prosperity for the UK overall.

In absolute terms Britain has become more prosperous; however it has fallen behind internationally, especially in terms of education and health. Unless Cameron can turn the improved economy into improved prosperity by 2020 he will be remembered as another Tory who put the economy before national prosperity.

Abigail Watson is a research intern at the Legatum Institute

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

7 Responses to “10 years on, Cameron’s compassionate Conservativism has failed to deliver its promises”

  1. robertcp

    I hate to say it but this is unfair on Cameron. The last Parliament and the last one would have been difficult whoever was in power and the governments led by Cameron have basically followed Darling’s approach towards deficit reduction. All we can say is that a Labour-led government might have been a little less dogmatic on austerity and slightly more compassionate.


    I thought Cameron was elected 2010. 5 ,1/2 years ago. What is compassionate?

  3. Guy

    Is anyone really surprised? He is following a US-Republican ideological agenda, which has everything but the best interests of the British people front and centre.

  4. Nick

    compassionate Conservationism never ever existed and only a fool could be taken in by 3 elitists from the The Bullingdon Club which is an exclusive but unofficial all-male students’ dining club based in Oxford, United Kingdom. It is noted for its wealthy members, grand banquets and boisterous rituals, such as the vandalizing (‘trashing’) of restaurants and college rooms.

  5. Intolerant_Liberal

    Compassionate Conservatism is a bit like the All Male Wing of Saudi Feminism!!!! It is, and was, utter bunk and nonsense from a government by, of and for the white, rich, utterly privileged and privately educated of Planet London. When we have people in power now who by and large have never known a moment’s economic hardship or discomfort or where the next paycheck is coming from, is it any wonder that their policies are aimed at people like themselves? What did people expect from a party run by toffs, semi toffs and privileged over educated posh boys mostly from London and the South East of England? A party geared towards civil rights, workers rights and the promotion of equality??? GET REAL, WILL YA!!!???

Comments are closed.