The Easyjet dispute highlights important lessons for building better businesses and a fairer society
Easyjet cabin crew are to vote over the coming month on potential strike action this August.
Their dispute over the company’s offer of a small pay increase highlights some important lessons for building better businesses and a better society.
Firstly, that Unions have a vital role to play in addressing low pay and the gaping income gap between those at the top and everybody else.
These are problems that everybody wants to solve.
However the left might caricature the Tories, they’re not sitting in castles chuckling about inequality. Prior to the election David Cameron exhorted businesses to give their staff a payrise. Boris Johnson said this week that the top rate of tax should not come down without a significant increase in the minimum wage. He’s previously stated that we need to shake ‘the cornflake packet’ to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to get to the top, and has fulminated against the ‘extraordinary’ growth in income differences within British companies.
The problem is that merely talking about these issues – usually alongside implausibly optimistic platitudes about the role of education making things better in the future – will not improve the current pay and conditions of ordinary workers or achieve a fairer balance of incomes between those at the top and everybody else.
What is really needed – and even the International Monetary Fund and Hedge Fund billionaires recognise/fear this – is an empowered workforce, with trade union representation giving them the capability to secure a better deal for themselves, rather than hoping for a hand-out from their employers inspired by politicians speeches.
Easyjet workers are showing how workers can fight for a better deal; but it happens too rarely in Britain, where we have amongst the lowest level of collective bargaining coverage and worker participation in company decision-making in Europe.
The second lesson from the Easyjet dispute relates to excessive executive pay, and how it does companies no favours whatsoever. Research for the High Pay Centre found that industrial conflicts are more common in workplaces with bigger pay gaps. Easyjet CEO Carolyn McCall was paid £7.7 million last year, more than 150 times the average Easyjet employee. According to Unite the Union, many cabin crew staff get little over £10,000 as their basic salary and are reliant on bonuses and commission to top up their total pay package.
Mccall’s pay was cited by the Easyjet Union when rejecting the company’s pay offer, just as ITV staff brought up CEO Adam Crozier’s £8 million pay package when balloting for industrial action last year. It’s no wonder that this kind of different treatment for people who are working for the same company and contributing to its success proves irksome, increasing the likelihood of industrial conflict.
Easyjet has, of course, been successful, with pre-tax profits of over £500 million last year. But it’s legitimate to question the value of such successes to the wider economy, when a tiny number of people grab a disproportionate share of the rewards.
Luke Hildyard is a contributing editor at Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter
42 Responses to “Why the Easyjet pay dispute matters”
engine85
The A400M wings are built at the Filton factory, Airbus also supplies those same aircraft to Germany, Spain, France, Turkey, Belgium, Luxembourg and Malaysia, does that mean that the workforce at Filton is also classed as state employees in Malaysia ? ? Thats a ridiculous statement, those people are not paid by the state. They have nothing to do with the state whatsoever. They are employed by a private company listed in the Netherlands. If you continue to follow that line of thought, then all the Dell employees that work in the USA are also state employees, as the government buys Dell computers, its utter nonsense.
By any definition, a state employee is an individual that is paid from the state purse, i would imagine that a small private cleaning contractor that an NHS hospital sub contracts to, would certainly count as they are paid by the state through a 3rd party. The MOD civilians at Brize Norton that carry out maintenance on the A400M airframes owned by the MOD and operated by the RAF would certainly be classed as a state employee,
blarg1987
By definition yes as those Airbus employees are being paid by those states purses as your definition applies.
But to get the 70% figure for the UK I bet you that is how it is measured here, but not been done abroad.
Random
Engine85, you’re an arsehole!!! Enough said!
Random
Engine85, you’re seriously an arsehole! Bye bye!
ChrisJHenning
Last 40 year Best Home Income with leftfootforward… < ……. Find Here