Some papers sympathise with the victims, while others swim in the sewer of nativism
As politicians compete to find the most callous and militarised response to the Calais ‘migrant crisis’, a division has opened up among the Tory commentariat.
Finally, after some excellent reporting by several papers, columns sympathising with the victims of war abroad – rather than put out British tourists – have been published in the Tory press.
The Times has a thoughtful and stirring piece by David Aaronovitch looking at the real causes of the crisis, (dictatorship and war), which handily shames much of the press coverage of recent migration. Read it all here (£).
The Telegraph’s Emma Barnett (no relation) mocks emphasis on the supposed plight of British tourists stuck on motorways over ‘hundreds of displaced people from all over the world [who] live in some of the most wretched conditions’. She concludes:
“An island nation we might be, but that doesn’t have to mean our mentality must follow suit.”
The Daily Express and the Daily Mail, by contrast, chose to blame ‘the French’ for being too lax, and demand that soldiers in Europe be used to pacify refugees who have fled soldiers in the Middle East and Africa.
The worst of the bunch is probably the Sun.
Along with blaming ‘Frenchies’ (which century is this?), and running a two-page story headlined ‘Farce-holes’ against a picture of migrants tearing through fences, the paper’s main comment piece belongs in the archives, alongside Katie ‘let them drown’ Hopkins’s infamous ‘cockroaches’ screed.
Veteran noise-maker Rod Liddle, who was a troll before there were trolls, has decided to restate and extend the ‘what a rubbish holiday’ model, in a piece headlined:
‘Go on holiday to France? You’d be better off in Syria’.
Liddle doesn’t even attempt to justify this proposal, I suspect because he has little interest in what’s happening in Syria. Instead we are treated to sentences like this, describing the sort of holiday you can expect in France:
“…when you reach your home and empty out the car, you find Mohammed, Tariq and Abdullah from Somalia hiding in the kids’ lunchboxes.”
As against Aaronovitch’s solid internationalism, Liddle’s analysis is proudly nativist:
“It’s not a British problem. It’s not an EU problem. It’s a French problem.
They need to sort out Calais, and quick.Deport the immigrants. Send them back to the countries they came from. Stop whining about not having enough help.”
What if they face torture, death or persecution in ‘the countries they came from’? The thought seems never to cross Liddle’s mind. Or perhaps it does, and he simply thinks, ‘Not my problem’.
When he half-jokingly says ‘you’d be better off in Syria’, what he effectively means is, ‘they would be better off in Syria’. Which is quite a presumptuous line to take for a Little Englander with scant interest in Syria, Somalia, or anywhere else he’s unlikely to go on holiday.
Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter
Read more:
Express complains about bilingual children, as language stands in for race
Hard-left plot to elect Corbyn Labour leader? The numbers don’t add up
Sign up for our weekly email by clicking here.
47 Responses to “Rod Liddle says send migrants back to Syria in the Sun’s shameful Calais coverage”
MacGuffin
If Cole were here (he seems to have run away), I’m sure he’d say ‘But…but…but…they really really really want to come to the UK and it’s against their human rights to say no and you’re a big tory meanie and dailymaildailymaildailymail…!’
KingHasNoClothes
Sad…..but true.
Cole
I specifically say that we shouldn’t let millions in. You insist that’s what I am saying. What a strange way to argue. I’m clearly wasting my time.
Oh, and by the way, the original article was about the Daily Mail, so I’m hardly working it in. And I do think that what you right wingers are doing parallels how the Mail and their friends demonised Jewish refugees in the 30s.
David
Aaronovitch being obviously Jewish is bound to be pro immigration and diversity. They want more immogrants so they can push for more laws to protect monorities but it’s really for their benefit. Their true colours are to seen in Israel where no blacks are allowed to live because they want to protect the Jewish state and the chosen race. They even put blacks in concentration camps how sick is that.Jews should be deported from Europe not Africans.
MacGuffin
OK, so you say we should not let millions in. You do, however, say we MUST let the two thousand in and that anyone who disagrees with you is selfish.
So where, exactly, does the number of refugees cross the line, in your view, from saying Yes to saying No? Ten thousand? One hundred thousand? One million? Please state a figure, and explain what makes your figure fair and non-selfish.
Oh, and please also explain what you would do with the hundreds of thousands of refugees who would STILL flock to Calais once you had allowed in your preferred number.
You really are just mouthing off, aren’t you, and making yourself feel good by accusing other people of selfishness.