Falconer made no mention of the candidates' sex, but the damage is already done
The shadow justice secretary stands accused of dismissing the two women candidates for Labour leader.
The trouble is, it’s all based on spin by the Times, whose proprietor Rupert Murdoch must be rubbing his hands with glee.
Falconer’s piece called for party unity and argued that Andy Burnham was the best person to lead Labour.
The Times published Lord Falconer’s piece online, then reported it in print as follows:
Women ‘are not tough enough to lead Labour’
(The web headline is a bit better, though not much: ‘Women in Labour leadership race ‘not up to challenge‘.)
The Times write-up (stitch-up more like) begins:
“The Labour party risks becoming too ‘challenging’ for either Yvette Cooper or Liz Kendall to cope with over the next few years, according to a leading Blairite figure.”
Sense the tone.
Liz Kendall has taken public exception to his piece, saying: “For Charlie to say that women somehow aren’t tough enough to lead the Labour party is a gross insult […]”
However, you will search in vain for any reference to the sex of the candidates in Falconer’s piece.
He does write that ‘neither Yvette nor Liz’ can unite the party through a challenging period for Labour, in the way he argues Burnham can.
Does the Times or anyone else doubt the party faces such non-sex specific challenges?
You can read the relevant passage below and make up your own minds.
This spin by the Times will likely see calls for Andy Burnham to disassociate himself from Falconer’s non-sexist remarks.
What a waste of time.
Lord Falconer wrote, in the context of endorsing Andy Burnham:
“Liz Kendall and Yvette Cooper are both very talented politicians. Both have a big future in our party. But neither Yvette nor Liz can steer the Labour party through the challenging few years ahead of us when we need a leader who can reach out to all wings of our party and provide unity.”
Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter
Sign up for our weekly email by clicking here.
As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.
We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.