Are British voters really primed for Corbyn?

We should be wary of any claim that the British public is instinctively left-wing


According to a widely-shared article, the British electorate privately supports solidly left-wing policies such as railway renationalisation and the abolition of tuition fees, even though right-wing governments get elected.

Should we, then, assume that voters would seize the opportunity to have their instincts represented at elections by a Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn?

It goes without saying that the same opinion polls persistently overstated Labour’s popularity and suffered deep methodological problems, but this does not entirely discredit them. Individual findings are certainly questionable. Yes, polls showed that the public was opposed to the tuition fee rise and broadly supported Labour modestly reducing tuition fees to £6,000. (By the way, the same polls showed voters thought this would most benefit the well-off.)

But this is not the same as the electorate supporting Corbyn’s total abolition, which he has costed at £7bn. If pollsters offered this much stronger policy to the public with its price-tag attached, it is reasonable to assume reception would be more lukewarm.

We do have an alternative index of public opinion: the British Social Attitudes survey, held every year since 1983 and co-authored by pollster-of-the-moment John Curtice. The most recent BSA showed that a mere 21 per cent of people share Corbyn’s belief in the abolition of tuition fees. People might favour lower fees but they do not oppose them in principle.

Most pressing for the Left is the big picture: the proportion of people in favour of higher taxation and spending has collapsed from 63 per cent to just 37 per cent in the ten years from 2004 to 2014. Support for welfare spending has plummeted. Those who remember Blair-era clichés about a ‘social-democratic majority’ should consider whether they still stand up to scrutiny.

Stating the obvious, the reason we have polling data on most of these positions – fees, tax, Syria – is that Ed Miliband’s Labour Party explicitly represented them. When it came to a large poll of the electorate – a General Election with the highest turnout since 1997 – 49.5 per cent of voters plumped for the Tories or UKIP while 46.5 per cent went for a broad ‘left’ of Labour/SNP/Lib Dem/Green (39.0 per cent if you exclude the ambiguous Lib Dems).

This does not mean we should jettison all Ed’s policies, but it makes clear that being on the right side of public opinion on a basket of issues yields limited rewards.

The most important point is this: sharing some of voters’ positions does not mean you share their overall priorities. Labour’s position on Trident or railway ownership should always be debated but will not swing elections. While it is impossible to disaggregate all the reasons behind Labour’s electoral defeat, TUC-commissioned polling suggested many voters who considered voting Labour ultimately chose not to because of their perceived lack of economic competence.

This is the stubborn frame for policy discussions. It means that even when a policy like the 50 per cent tax rate polls well, many will not trust Labour with the decision. Meanwhile Osborne gets away with unpopular measures like abolishing student grants because – like it or not – people usually think his budgets are fair overall.

Even those who do not agree with the reasonable strategic case for making concessions on austerity should be wary of any claim that the British public is instinctively left-wing and sceptical about cherry-picking policy positions from opinion polls. Remember that UKIP can easily do exactly the same thing on immigration, overseas aid or inheritance tax. Most people are surely to the left of the Conservative frontbench on many issues, but Cameron can rule from the right as long as Labour keeps losing.

Labour’s big challenge is not to provide a voice for an imagined dormant left-wing majority. It needs instead to recognise the sheer dogged power of austerity thinking while also re-establishing itself among non-Labour voters as a plausible party of government.

Labour should not imagine public opinion is static and blindly follow the polls, but nobody should kid themselves that Corbyn would not have at least as hard a job persuading a sceptical public as he would uniting a divided party – both on many specific issues and certainly on the big picture.

Robert Priest is a lecturer in history at Royal Holloway University of London, although this article is written in his capacity as a Labour Party supporter

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

25 Responses to “Are British voters really primed for Corbyn?”

  1. Skiamakhos

    What was it, 73% of Mirror readers & 71% of Guardian readers support Corbyn? Something like that anyway. Either way, a pre-existing disposition towards the Left is not essential to the success of a Corbyn-led Labour party. Tireless campaigning, educating people, showing them the benefits, showing them when the Right is lying to their faces, is.
    Tireless campaigning against what looks like the favourite to become Labour Leader is not going to get a Labour victory in 2020.

  2. stevep

    One thing that never gets commented on in opinion polls and surveys, is how the steady and relentless drip, drip, drip of right wing media propaganda affects the thinking of the general public.

    If the public were to have no contact at all with any media for a few months and then asked to comment on whatever, I suspect the results would be very different. They would be commenting on how they actually saw things for themselves, not on how they are usually told how things are.

    Propaganda is power. Totalitarian regimes know it, “Democratic” regimes use it to keep people where they want them and the advertising industry makes extensive use out of it to sell people things they never knew they wanted.

    For the last 30 or 40 years, British people have been told that socialism (the left) is bad and Capitalism (the right) is good. Small wonder then voters who would instinctively be left wing feel unease about anything left of centre.

    Despite the naysayers, scaremongerers and propagandists, there`s no huge support for the right in the UK any more. The Tories barely scraped a majority for the first time in 23 years and UKIP managed one seat.

    The left are split for sure, at the moment, but share common ground on a lot of policies. They also have a lot of MP`s in the Commons. Electoral boundary changes, if they go through, will make things more difficult for Labour, but not impossible.

    The Conservatives and UKIP will face difficult times before and after the EU in/out vote and change of leader. The public won`t swallow austerity mk.2 for much longer either.

    Mass media is in decline and Labour should be utilising internet blogs (like LFF) and social media to campaign and get the message across. It should be using it`s brightest media talents to do this.
    leave the dirty tricks to the Tories, the Left needs to claim the high ground to win support.
    If Labour elects a leader who can clearly distance the party from the Tories, as the SNP, Plaid Cymru and Green Party have done and clearly demonstrate policies that are supportive of working people and the wider public then they can win the next General election.

  3. Neil Wilson

    “If pollsters offered this much stronger policy to the public with its price-tag attached, it is reasonable to assume reception would be more lukewarm.”

    But if they did that it would be a simple lie.

    The ‘price tag’ comes from spending the money in the first place. It all goes around in a big circle. My spending is your income.

    How does saddling youngsters with vast debts help them spend money when they graduate? It is the spending of the young – setting up house, buying their own place, doing refurbishments and buying furniture – that provides huge swathes of the economy with an income.

    It is very bad economics to hang Damocles Sword over them.

  4. Jacko

    A tip Jeremy. If you want to be taken at all seriously by people other than Socialist Worker types get a decent shirt and suit, take the pens out of your top pocket, have a shave, and stop going on about Karl Marx.


    And he should forget about Islamic and Irish fascists.

Comments are closed.