If the Mail's number crunching was honest, it would suggest the BBC is right-wing
The Daily Mail has accused the BBC of ‘following a left-wing agenda’ based on which newspapers it purchases for staff.
The story notes that in 2014 the BBC spend £127,643 on copies of the liberal Guardian, versus only £40,482 for the Daily Mail itself: “The startling figure is nearly 45 per cent higher than its bill for any other title, despite the Guardian accounting for a tiny fraction of Britain’s newspaper sales.”
What the Mail doesn’t tell readers is the number of copies purchased by the BBC for the two papers is almost identical.
The Beeb bought 80,679 copies of the Guardian compared to 78,463 copies of the Mail. That’s a difference of a mere 2216 over the year.
Across a year, that amounts to 221 copies of the Guardian a day, (not many for an organisation the size of the BBC) versus about 214 for the Mail – in other words, very close, and not anything like a big enough difference to justify the charge of bias.
The basis of the disparity in expenditure appears to be due to the Guardian, er, being more expensive than the Mail (£1.80 versus 60p weekdays). So the paper’s use of these numbers is extremely misleading.
But what about the other papers?
While the Mail’s print edition only runs the story, it’s website has the stats: (click to enlarge)
If you just take the explicitly conservative papers – the Mail, Express, Telegraph and the Sun – the BBC spent a whopping £201,684 on right-wing papers last year, or 262,236 copies. If you throw in the Times it’s £280,509, or 339,403 copies.
If you add up all the papers that backed the Tories in the general election (and exclude the Star), the Beeb spent £436,745 on pro-Tory papers in 2014. That’s 440,995 copies.
On the liberal papers – the Mirror, Guardian and Independent – the BBC spent £229,087 or 202,546 copies.
So if newspaper purchases are evidence of bias or a political agenda at the BBC, they demonstrably point Right . It’s good of the Mail to flag this up.
Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter
Read more:
The Sun wants to scrap the Human Rights Act…after using it to defend its reporters
Murdoch-owned Times attacks BBC for ‘media empire’ monopoly
Sign up for our weekly email by clicking here.
20 Responses to “Daily Mail accuses BBC of left-wing bias…because the Guardian is more expensive”
James Chilton
Why doesn’t the BBC staff read these newspapers online? It would be a lot cheaper.
Philip
The Independent backed a Lib Dem/Tory coalition. Not exactly left wing.
GhostofJimMorisson
Oh for god’s sake, not ANOTHER Daily Mail article from LFF! It’s quite pathetic and boring. It seems that, since the election, LFF has had very little to say, other than ‘whataboutery’ rant.
Vally
“The Beeb bought 80,679 copies of the Guardian compared to 78,463 copies of the Mail.”
They should be buying 30,000 copies of The Guardian, max.
The Guardian circulation is so poorly low that they’re becoming an irrelevant entity and therefore don’t represent that many people at all – but they still have the guts to purchase the most copies of The Guardian. This absurd bias is clear.
If anything, they should be buying two times more copies of The Mail than they should The Guardian if they wish to represent the population properly. Infact, even more. That goes for The Sun et cetera too.
Cole
The Guardian is not irrelevant at all. It’s highly succesful online, much more so that the Telegraph.
However, why does the Beeb actually buy all these papers? Don’t they have Internet access?