Instead the times call for intelligent and cohesive radicalism
Ed Balls only last week proclaimed his intention to celebrate Labour’s impending victory with a toast from one the party’s now infamous immigration control mugs.
Yet somehow the election was lost, as was Morley and Outwood. My guess is that the champagne bottle stayed corked and the shadow chancellor hit the emergency Scotch instead. Never was hubris so pertinently encapsulated.
As the full scale of the defeat starts to sink in, the left obviously needs to take stock of the situation. Or to put it another way, you know how bad you think things are? They’re far worse than that.
For a start, the setback in Scotland should not be characterised as a bad by-election night, multiplied by 40. This was far, far more than a capricious protest vote by north of the border ingrates destined to come back to their natural home as soon as they see the error of their nationalist-crazeds ways.
Yes, Ed Miliband’s catastrophic mishandling of the Falkirk situation and his decision to work alongside the Conservatives in the Better Together campaign carry much of the blame for this outcome.
But as those who sought to disculpate the late Iosif Dzhugashvili used to put it, our leader was badly advised.
The attitude behind the strange death of Labour Scotland are exemplified by Tony Blair’s potty-mouthed contempt for the ‘unreconstructed wankers’ of the Scottish media.
The profanity – presumably not the sort of taunt our three-time prime minister uses in church or directs towards his clients in Kazakhstan – was intended to deride continued attachment to class politics.
That is now a wider issue. Unreconstructed wankers are now being offered an unprecedented choice of pornography. Thus a substantial section of white working class vote has gone across to UKIP, while much of the bien pensant left has departed to the Greens.
What we are witnessing is what Marxism Today would 30 years ago doubtless have pompously theorised as the splintering of Labour’s constituent bloc of classes.
It is now easy to imagine the Conservatives in power for a generation, given that the current electoral system delivers to the combined right a permanent structural majority in the United Kingdom as a whole, and a fortiori in England and Wales.
The likelihood is that after Miliband’s brief Indian Summer for tepid social democracy, Labour will fall back into the hands of Blairites – many of them also unreconstructed – and lurch sharply towards New New Labourism.
Already there are calls for Labour to adopt a Partito della Rifondazione Blairista strategy. These days that may or may not work in the home counties; I have my doubts. But it will certainly not work in inner London, or Brighton, or the north, or – it hardly needs saying – Scotland.
With no prospect of a centre-left government for some considerable time, extra-parliamentary action, in the broad Bennite sense of the term, must form part of the way forward.
Successful local hospital campaigns give a taster of the local victories that might be possible, and which will do more than anything else to rebuild Labour’s grassroots.
Given the obvious potential for social unrest in a country where in-your-face inequality will become ever more blatant, it will also be important to channel anger in a direction more positive than that of watching the disenfranchised burn down their own communities.
None of this should be accompanied by ultraleftist ‘parliament is irrelevant, change will only come from the streets’ rhetoric.
Elected office incurs legitimacy on those that hold it, and they may have opportunities to exploit the numerous divisions that will arise within the Conservative Party. We need to be savvy enough to take advantage of such possibilities by maximising parliamentary and local government representation.
To that end, Labour needs to come out unequivocally in favour of proportional representation. There is likely to be increasing clamour for it anyway, as the current voting system stands revealed as grotesquely unfair.
It will also – to state the obvious – have to come to terms with the Scottish National Party, whether it likes it or not. But that’s another article.
‘Suicide by cop’ describes what happens when someone deliberately behaves in a threatening manner, with the goal being to provoke a lethal response from a law enforcement officer.
Labour should not opt for the political equivalent, in the shape of suicide by Blairism; the times call for intelligent and cohesive radicalism instead.
David Osland is a London-based journalist and writer
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
32 Responses to “Comment: Labour should steer clear of suicide by Blairism”
AlanGiles
“The Labour Party of the 70s and 80s should be allowed to rest in peace,
the country has changed and the LP should change with it.”
That surely includes the 90s and early 2000s as well then?
DRbilderburg
The Tories will have a 60+ MP advantage before the first vote is cast in 2020 Rupert Murdoch’s share of the Media will have gone up Look at the names in the ring for the Labour leadership. Jarvis has ruled himself out 1 thing is absolutely guaranteed we’re looking well beyond 2020 for a Labour Government They are merely a support act for the Tories RIP labour RIP libdems
Hawkeye
Personally, I’d like to see a more left-wing Labour Government. But practically I think it would be absolutely the wrong thing for Labour to do. All the people, the author of this opinion piece among them, calling for the party to move left have absolutely failed to explain how that would have won this election. Let’s look at some facts. Labour didn’t fail to win a majority because it lost Scotland. It didn’t fail to win because any more left-wing party took their vote. It didn’t fail to win because its supporters stayed at home (turnout was marginally up).
It failed to win because too many people voted Tory. Let that sink in for a moment… the LibDem vote collapsed and… a significant majority of those people voted Tory. A significant number of people who previously voted Labour, voted Tory.
None of that will get any better under a more left-wing Labour. We can all discuss how we’d like to see the party move more to the left… but we have to choose whether we want a left-wing party outside of any realistic hope of Government, or a more centre-left party with a fighting chance of undoing the damage done by yet more years of a Tory Government. Cheap, dismissive, language about “suicide by Blairism” is simply weakening any constructive points that you might want to make.
Selohesra
Trouble is you can move to the centre and win votes in England or move to the left and maintain financial support from Unite & the other unions – you can’t do both. Perhaps Labour should now embrace some form of PR. This would allow Labour (and probably Tories) to split into two or more factions without commiting electoral suicide – it would be difficult for Tories to resist if UKIP/Libs/Greens/Labour all pushed for it.
TN
No because the 90s and early 00s were actually successful for the party.