More coverage for the royal foetus as the disgrace of foodbanks is dropped down the memory hole
Bad news this morning. We live in a country where one unborn baby gets more press than hundreds of thousands of hungry children.
As Ruby Stockham reports in these pages, the Trussell Trust charity today says it received a million vouchers for emergency food at foodbanks across the country last year (2014/15).
This is up by nearly a fifth (19 per cent) from the year before, and includes just shy of 400,000 vouchers for children. This doesn’t mean a million different people or 400,000 different children, but this is still an appallingly high number of people. The Trust believes the true figure may be even higher.
But you wouldn’t know any of this if you relied on the right-wing press in this country. Because not one of the national papers of a rightward bent found space to mention such a headline-worthy milestone – not the Daily Mail, the Telegraph, the Sun, the Express, or even the Times.
Though the data was embargoed until midnight, both the Mirror and the Guardian managed to run prominent stories in their print editions. Why not the others? Could it be they find it embarrassing that the Trust says foodbank use has risen due to government welfare cuts and low wages?
The foodbank story is also missing from the supposedly left-wing Independent, though its Tory stablemate, the free Evening Standard, has run a London-specific story online which might go in tonight’s print edition. These two anomalies aside, the coverage – or lack thereof – does seem to break down along Right/Left lines.
Meanwhile, the offending papers did find space for massive (and vacuous) coverage of speculation about the royal foetus, who once born will not have to want for anything a day of his/her life. It’s good to know these papers have their priorities sorted out.
Space was also found for a US court decision to grant habeas corpus rights to two chimpanzees. This is an undoubtedly brilliant story, and even garnered an editorial in the Telegraph teasing the decision and its implications in the ‘human-rights-come-first’ mode.
I think we could more easily join them in their chuckles about a US court granting rights to monkeys if these papers showed more interest in the human rights of hungry people in Britain.
Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter
Read more: Daily Mail spins BBC leaders’ interviews to toe the Tory line
Sexism and red-baiting as the Sun warns of a ‘scarlet sisterhood’ of women leaders
Sign up for our newsletter by clicking here.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
16 Responses to “One million foodbank visits, but not one story in the Tory press”
JohnRich
Indeed it is not true. Guido has the details.
See: http://order-order.com/2015/04/22/more-bbc-website-bias-food-bank-headline-claim-made-up/#_@/JLg7nP6b_1kq2g
JAMES MCGIBBON
The State has loadsamoney how do you think the banks were bailed out! The food banks are a result of almost economic collapse caused by the banks and corrupt financial institutions.
Guest
Guido lies about the article, right, as he calls facts biased against his reality again.
SgtVimes
Since when has building up debt by bailing out the banks and then making life impossible for the poor by cutting the safety net been socialist? Its also important to remember that while the Trussell Trust are the largest food bank chain they do not represent all food banks and so any figures will only represent a proportion of the real scale of the issue.
andrea jackson
Guido states “so the number of people using food banks is likely to be around half of the 1.1 million figure.” – well that’s reassuring then.