Bombs, cockroaches, HIV, backstabbing - what country is this?
Yesterday, London Mayor Boris Johnson took to the pages of the Telegraph to say Labour’s plans for rent controls would ‘savage our cities faster than any bomb’. A few weeks earlier, defence secretary Michael Fallon wrote in the Times that Miliband was preparing to ‘stab the country in the back’ by working with the SNP.
Not to be outdone, the Daily Mail today came close to accusing Miliband of policies similar to those of Joseph Stalin.
The paper’s front page screams:
MILIBAND THE LAND-GRABBER
Red Ed’s threat to confiscate unused land branded ‘Stalinist’
as backlash grows over his plan to control the property prices
The story begins:
“Ed Miliband lurched further to the Left yesterday with a land grab to extend state control over the property market.
The Labour leader’s ‘Stalinist’ plan to seize unused plots – as well as impose rent controls – shocked experts and investors. […]
The Institute of Directors describes the land grab as a ‘Stalinist attack on property rights’.”
I don’t see why any of them should be shocked. This policy has long been suggested by Labour, and was reported in the Daily Mail in June 2013, over two years ago.
The ‘Stalinist’ gag from the Institute of Directors is also at least a year-and-a-half old, printed a few months later in 2013 – also in the Mail.
The Mail doesn’t republish the full quote from the IoD, so here it is:
“Graeme Leach, of the Institute of Directors, condemned the plans, comparing them to Joseph Stalin’s notorious seizure of land from prosperous Russians known as the Kulaks.
‘Mr Miliband’s “use it or lose it” declaration is a Stalinist attack on property rights,’ he said.
‘The fundamental problem with the housing market is the public sector planning system, not private sector builders.
‘It’s hard to imagine a more statist solution to a problem caused by the state.'”
Thank heavens we have people like Mr Leach to protect us from dangerous ideologies.
So the Mail decided to dig up his non-ideological quote from 2013 and spread it across its front page today like butter on toast.
The paper’s readers, if they think about it, are unlikely to agree that capping rent for three years, or using compulsory purchase orders to build housing on disused land, are policies comparable to Stalin’s collectivization in Soviet Russia.
It’s also a bit surprising to see the Mail abusing language in this way, and insulting the victims of Stalinism, after its earnest treatment of the subject when justifying its attack on Ed Miliband’s father, Ralph.
The paper might still be a little gun-shy about this after the huge criticism it received. Its editorial column today reads as if a redraft removed the words ‘Communist/Soviet tyranny’:
“Confiscating private land has chilling echoes of a banana republic.”
But the story is the latest example of the growth of outlandish rhetoric in political debate, usually expressed in print or on television.
From the ‘bombs’ and ‘backstabbing’ remarks mentioned above, Katie Hopkins’s ‘gunboats and cockroaches’ piece for the Sun, or Nigel Farage’s HIV-infected African migrants, public discourse is being dragged into the mud.
Whether good taste prevails will continue to depend on how the reading public responds.
Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter
Read more: Miliband says no SNP deal and the Sun says ‘La-la-la can’t hear you’
No talk of immigration? What planet is the Daily Mail living on?
Sign up for our weekly newsletter by clicking here.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
23 Responses to “Daily Mail’s ‘Stalinist’ smear on Labour rides on nasty trend in public debate”
Selohesra
Even I would accept the Mail is a tad biased – but that is much less dangerous than the bias to Left of the BBC. The BBC have much greater influence & reach than all the newspapers put together
Leon Wolfeson
Ah yes, less “dangerous” (i.e. it’s on your side) than the government-toe-licking BBC, which you wave your arms and declare magically leftist.
Leon Wolfeson
And yet you come here to troll.
Leon Wolfeson
It nonsense, he’s to the right of Thatcher, economically.
You talk about people other than you, as you engage in PC bigotry against the left, and whine there’s insufficient punishment of the eeevil poor, while you ignore the vanity projects of your Tories, like HS2 and the Boris Bridge.
Rather than spending on the poor. Which Labour won’t do anyway.
thruthseeker
i woudnt want that mail daily shit anywear near my arse,
The rise of fascism
The “Hurrah for the Blackshirts” article by Lord Rothermere
Lord Rothermere was a friend of Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler, and directed the Mail’s editorial stance towards them in the early 1930s.[32][33]
Rothermere’s 1933 leader “Youth Triumphant” praised the new Nazi
regime’s accomplishments, and was subsequently used as propaganda by
them.[34]
In it, Rothermere predicted that “The minor misdeeds of individual
Nazis would be submerged by the immense benefits the new regime is
already bestowing upon Germany”.