Daily Mail’s ‘Stalinist’ smear on Labour rides on nasty trend in public debate

Bombs, cockroaches, HIV, backstabbing - what country is this?

 

Yesterday, London Mayor Boris Johnson took to the pages of the Telegraph to say Labour’s plans for rent controls would ‘savage our cities faster than any bomb’. A few weeks earlier, defence secretary Michael Fallon wrote in the Times that Miliband was preparing to ‘stab the country in the back’ by working with the SNP.

Not to be outdone, the Daily Mail today came close to accusing Miliband of policies similar to those of Joseph Stalin.

The paper’s front page screams:

MILIBAND THE LAND-GRABBER

Red Ed’s threat to confiscate unused land branded ‘Stalinist’

as backlash grows over his plan to control the property prices

Mail April 28 Stalinist

The story begins:

“Ed Miliband lurched further to the Left yesterday with a land grab to extend state control over the property market.

The Labour leader’s ‘Stalinist’ plan to seize unused plots – as well as impose rent controls – shocked experts and investors. […]

The Institute of Directors describes the land grab as a ‘Stalinist attack on property rights’.”

I don’t see why any of them should be shocked. This policy has long been suggested by Labour, and was reported in the Daily Mail in June 2013over two years ago. 

The ‘Stalinist’ gag from the Institute of Directors is also at least a year-and-a-half old, printed a few months later in 2013 – also in the Mail. 

The Mail doesn’t republish the full quote from the IoD, so here it is:

“Graeme Leach, of the Institute of Directors, condemned the plans, comparing them to Joseph Stalin’s notorious seizure of land from prosperous Russians known as the Kulaks. 

‘Mr Miliband’s “use it or lose it” declaration is a Stalinist attack on property rights,’ he said.

‘The fundamental problem with the housing market is the public sector planning system, not private sector builders.

It’s hard to imagine a more statist solution to a problem caused by the state.'”

Thank heavens we have people like Mr Leach to protect us from dangerous ideologies.

So the Mail decided to dig up his non-ideological quote from 2013 and spread it across its front page today like butter on toast.

The paper’s readers, if they think about it, are unlikely to agree that capping rent for three years, or using compulsory purchase orders to build housing on disused land, are policies comparable to Stalin’s collectivization in Soviet Russia.

It’s also a bit surprising to see the Mail abusing language in this way, and insulting the victims of Stalinism, after its earnest treatment of the subject when justifying its attack on Ed Miliband’s father, Ralph.

The paper might still be a little gun-shy about this after the huge criticism it received. Its editorial column today reads as if a redraft removed the words ‘Communist/Soviet tyranny’:

“Confiscating private land has chilling echoes of a banana republic.”

But the story is the latest example of the growth of outlandish rhetoric in political debate, usually expressed in print or on television.

From the ‘bombs’ and ‘backstabbing’ remarks mentioned above, Katie Hopkins’s ‘gunboats and cockroaches’ piece for the Sun, or Nigel Farage’s HIV-infected African migrants, public discourse is being dragged into the mud.

Whether good taste prevails will continue to depend on how the reading public responds.

Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter

 

Read more: Miliband says no SNP deal and the Sun says ‘La-la-la can’t hear you’

No talk of immigration? What planet is the Daily Mail living on?

Sign up for our weekly newsletter by clicking here.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

23 Responses to “Daily Mail’s ‘Stalinist’ smear on Labour rides on nasty trend in public debate”

  1. JoeDM

    The Mail is an excellent newspaper. It provides its readers with the truth about then hypocriticaland incompetent Labour Party and their institutionally biased supporters in Radio and TV.

  2. 2catlady

    I’m confused again. why is is wrong for Ed to use deserted and unused land but ok for Dave to confiscate and sell on houses that belong to charities. Will Dave and Co go for other charity assets if they get in? RSPCA kennels at risk; the village hall up for grabs; and what the hell would he do with church halls that are used for food banks?

  3. Matthew Blott

    The press are pretty awful at the best of times but for the first time for a couple of generations there is a very real prospect of Britain having a genuinely leftwing Prime Minister. Media ownership is on the agenda and the reactionary owners are terrified. It is important for democracy they are finally cut down to size.

  4. Matthew Blott

    Yawn.

  5. JAMES MCGIBBON

    If you cut the Daily Mail into 6 inch squares you can wipe your arse with it. However rather than waste money on it just take their Metro and you can do it for free.

Comments are closed.