What's is happening in Scotland is symptomatic of a much deeper problem.
Ed Miliband should look closer to home before blaming Scottish Labour for the party’s problems
Yesterday’s polling by Ipsos Mori for STV suggesting a Labour meltdown north of the border took everyone by surprise. There was no way that Labour could ever be reduced to a rump of just four Scottish MPs, so everyone said.
As Ben Page, chief executive of Ipsos Mori, declared on Twitter just before the figures were published:
“Wow. Once a year or less we do a poll that genuinely surprises me and has big immediate implications. Out later!”
Then came the second poll which admittedly wasn’t as bad as the Ipsos Mori one, but nevertheless the YouGov survey, commissioned by the Times, put the SNP on 43 per cent and Labour on 27 per cent of the vote.
Replicated across all constituencies that would give the SNP ‘just’ 47 seats and Labour 10 in next year’s UK General Election.
The YouGov poll found also that just 15 per cent of those polled said they trusted the Labour leader, compared to 19 per cent for the prime minister.
Just last week the New Statesman was musing about the SNP gaining up to 25 seats. After the last two successive polls published yesterday this figure now increasingly looks like an optimistic scenario for the Labour Party.
Speaking to Scottish Labour’s gala dinner in Glasgow last night, Ed Miliband responded to the polls by stating the blindingly obvious – that things were ‘tough’ for Labour north of the border.
Whilst those around Miliband may continue to blame the party in Scotland for Labour’s woes, the reality is that it is Miliband himself that should be under pressure since what’s happening in Scotland is symptomatic of a much deeper problem.
It wasn’t Scottish Labour that came so close in Heywood and Middleton to UKIP taking a Labour seat. It is not Scottish Labour that is nowhere in Rochester and Strood – despite Labour having held much of the area the seat covers up until 2010.
And before anyone does blame Scottish Labour for its problems north of the border, when it comes to next year’s General Election it is Ed Miliband putting himself forward to be prime minister, not Johann Lamont, Jim Murphy or any other Scottish member of the party, and here Miliband’s ratings are simply abysmal.
I voted for Ed Miliband to be leader believing that he stood the best chance of reconnecting Labour with a public that had become increasingly weary of 13 years of Labour rule. Today, with a heavy heart, I admit that I was wrong.
Had we been further out from the election the vultures would have been circling and calling for Miliband to go. But to depose the leader now would be completely suicidal.
Sadly, Labour’s best hope is that it gets lucky somehow between now and May, because at the moment the good ship Labour is, tragically, resembling the titanic – about to hit an iceberg without enough time to turn the ship around.
Ed Jacobs is a contributing editor to Left Foot Forward
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
25 Responses to “What’s happening in Scotland is symptomatic of a deeper problem”
YESGUY
I think that this is the best news SNP have had so far, and it keeps getting better. London think think he’s the answer to their “problems ” in Scotland . They are clueless and so out of touch. Labour are finished . The red tory’s have a few die hard voters but have lost most of them to a party that lives in the past and when in the future challenges the tor’s to see who can rob the poor the most.
Happy days ahead YESSERS.
RolftheGanger
First, agreement that Milliband is a weak sister of a leader.
After that I disagree with the thrust of the article. It is too easy to scapegoat an admittedly poor leader.
But be clear. Labour is in vastly greater dissaray.
A party that has lost its soul.
Caught between to contradictory philosophies. Rabid neo-con barbarianism on the one side and outdated unreformed and un-updated “socialism” on the other. The first is merely a rationalisation for unprincipled unbridled greed. The second is a mostalic desire to hark back to good old idealistic simpler days. The glaring gap is the missing new optional story.
A party tha has lost touch with ethics, values and integrity defining conscionable conduct and decent honest dealings and debate. The “whatever it takes” cynical vacuum is superficially the quck, easy and appealing rooute. It has also been the route to self annihilation.
The above, combined, have created a polcy vcacuum where the engagement,commitment adnd dedication are forged in exciting and inspiring new directions, policies and ideas movements. Instead there is a viacuum. Machine politics, focus group driven and empty mechanical soundbites. The turn off of all time.
Party organisation, systems, operating methods etc have become top-down, centralised, over-controlled and under-performing; alienating instead of inspiring and attracting.
Performance on the ground is increasingly falling t the hired help in place of enthusiastic grassroots democracy.
Reverse all of the above and it can be cfound in the SNP, the Greens, the Radicals, other Yes Groups and emerging political forces in Scotland.
One can turn around a healthy party with a weak leader. There is zero chance of even a strong leader turning around so sick a party system.
So, face it. Blaming Milliband is a cop out.
IAB
And Scotland will be gone
Guest
Oh, so when are you blowing the nukes?
Leon Wolfeson
Socialism? Where? Oh please.