Trojan horse and the unbearable silliness of the denialists

Denial and deflection over extremism is a disservice to Muslim communities.

Denial and deflection over extremism is a disservice to Muslim communities

One of the most frustrating and depressing aspects of following extremism-related stories in the UK is the predictable frequency with which the denialist brigade rush to the fore to hush things up.

Whilst the twin towers in New York were still smouldering, we had this brigade trying to convince us it was an inside job. The day after 7/7 the same suspects were out in force claiming it was a MI5/MI5/CIA/Mossad operation, they can never quite decide which agency was involved but they are sure it was one of them.

It, therefore, should come as no great surprise that in the wake of numerous inquiries into the Birmingham Trojan Horse affair the denialists are back to their old tricks.

It must be stressed that both the Ofsted and Peter Clarke inquiry found that there was a concerted attempt to impose an extremist Islamist agenda on Birmingham state schools by a group of men linked with Islamist organisations.

The reports found:

–          Anti-Christian chanting in assemblies

–          Gender segregation in classrooms

–          Extremist speakers being invited into schools without being vetted

–          The promotion of homophobia, sexism and anti-Semitism amongst the teachers and governors involved in the plot

–          Bullying of non-Muslim and liberal Muslim staff

The reports are very clear about what was found and are available to read here and here. Following on from their publication, the Guardian decided to post a mind-blowingly inaccurate piece by former-Respect leader, Salma Yacoob, that made the following claim:

“The residents of Birmingham ought to be able to sleep more easily tonight. Peter Clarke’s 129-page report into the city’s schools found no evidence of plots to indoctrinate, groom or recruit school pupils to an agenda of radicalisation, violent extremism or terrorism. This is also the key finding of the reports commissioned by Birmingham city council and Ofsted.”

Clearly teaching children to hate non-Muslim, women, gays, Jews and the West in general is not extremist or a sign of radicalisation in her view. Salma is not unintelligent or unable to read which implies she is deliberately seeking to mislead the public about the true nature of what has been happening in Birmingham. She is not alone.

Salma is pipped to the ‘Britain’s most dishonest Muslim spokesperson’ spot by Myriam Francois-Cerrah. After pointing to some of the findings in the reports, Francois-Cerrah writes:

“But what the problem is not, is an issue of radicalisation. Rather, attempts to link the problems to radicalisation reflect an expansion of the counter-terrorism agenda to the policing of socially conservative views among some Muslims and the effects of this policy are likely to be disastrous.”

Converts like Myriam appear keen to absolve Muslims of all responsibility and remind non-Muslims that it is their ignorance that causes stagnation and extremism in Muslim communities.

Interestingly, both Salma and Myriam began their commentary on Trojan Horse affair when it was first covered by the press earlier this year, by claiming there were no problems at all and the plot was a figment of Michael Gove’s imagination. So I guess we have some progress.

Not to be outdone by the Salma and Myriam, the Muslim Council of Britain then entered the fray and reminded us all of just why they have become so irrelevant in recent years with this gem of wisdom:

“…we do take issue with Mr Clarke’s approach that chooses to ascribe guilt by association, and by conflating conservative Muslim practises to a supposed ideology and agenda to ‘Islamise’ secular schools.”

Oh dear.

What Salma, Myriam and the MCB need to understand is that you can’t pull the wool over people’s eyes on every single occasion. Denial and deflection over extremism is not a public service, it is a disservice to Muslim communities and it strengthens the hand of extremists. It also gives fodder to the far-right who use the denials of such spokespersons to push divisive narratives.

Extremism is clearly a problem in British Muslim communities and readers of this blog don’t need any further proof of that assertion. This problem can only be solved if it is exposed, discussed openly and challenged.

It will continue to fester if it is denied, defended and covered up. No matter how inconvenient or uncomfortable certain truths may be they still need to be faced.

Muslim spokespersons, like the ones mentioned in this post, need to move on from their tribal mind-set and stop construing all discussions about extremism as an attack on all Muslims. There is no ‘us vs. them’. We need to work together as a society, not get defensive and attack anyone who seeks to challenge real problems in communities. Please!

Amjad Khan is a Muslim writer and commentator

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

41 Responses to “Trojan horse and the unbearable silliness of the denialists”

  1. Liam Fairley

    Superb article!! Applauding until my hands go red!

  2. Mark

    I agree with every word, but I’d add the media as being culpable. On the direct assertion (as one only example) of girls sitting at the back of the class, the media discussed the generic term “gender segregation.” This allowed the likes of Francois-Cerrah to go off at all sorts of tangents about Eton, Cheltenham Ladies’ College and single-sex schools. These were non-comparisons to the direct allegation, yet she was allowed to produce a video where she spouted all this for (I think) Sunday or Daily Politics on the BBC. The interviewers nodded sagely, and might have prodded a tiny bit, but then allowed the “What about what Christian faith schools do?” which is another subject entirely and forgot the point that these schools were state, secular schools.

    Another “mistake” to a point, was the appointment of Peter Clarke because of his background in terrorism. This was leapt upon by both Yaqoob and Francoise-Cerrah (and some others) and they didn’t let go, and are still using it to almost defend the schools, in that no evidence of terrorism training was found. It wasn’t looked for by the way.
    They kept banging on about how the word “extreme” means terrorism, forgetting the fact that religious extremists can be detrimental in their practices to those who don’t lend themselves to that type of the religion. I sincerely hope both wouldn’t have agreed with their own education being disrupted by a girl’s sports day being cancelled simply because the organisers couldn’t guarantee that a male instructor wouldn’t be present. Or maybe they would accept that. But that is extreme in religion.
    As far as being a few of the regular “Muslim commentators” go, they have done themselves no favours at all with the deflection and denial. It’s time for the media to look down the range of people, away from orthodox conservative, towards secular/liberal, to get their views on TV/Radio, and not these people who give the impression that all Muslims are like that, which is not a good thing at all.

  3. Liam Fairley

    Huge round of applause for you, too!

  4. Mark

    Ooh ta

  5. swatnan

    Salma and indeed Chowdary have made quite a career out of being so called .community leaders’. You could ask which community. Because there is no one muslim comnunity but several dozem and I am sure they dislike each othder as much as say the Christian denominations do, or at least have the same suspicion of as. I’m sure that the Nigerian Muslim look down their noses at the recently arrived Somalian Muslim, and coment ‘we never had this kind of problem before, in my time’, with some justification. Salma is not a moderate but in the past has been a spokesperson for muslims. The worst kind though are the recently converts, who are more muslim than those born muslim. They are the real trouble makers. And George Galloway.

Comments are closed.