The Queen’s Speech: not a recall bill, but a fudge

Today's announcement ultimately puts the power of recall in the hands of parliament rather than the hands of constituents.

Today’s announcement ultimately puts the power of recall in the hands of parliament rather than the hands of constituents

Some predicted there would be mention of the right to recall MPs in today’s Queen’s Speech, and they were right.

Yet rather than announcing a democratic measure whereby constituents would have been able to deselect a useless/lazy/currupt MP, the government is essentially introducing a fudge.

Under coalition plans announced today and to be brought in before the 2015 general election, constituents will be able to sack their MP if they are sentenced to up to 12 months in jail. They will also be able to trigger a by-election if the House of Commons decides that an MP has engaged in “serious wrongdoing”. A vote would be forced if more than 10 per cent of constituents signed a petition over a two month period.

In other words, an MP would have to have committed an offence and parliament would have to agree to it before constituents have any right to recall that MP.

As you’ve probably worked out by now: that doesn’t really add up to the right of constituents to recall their MP. It also goes against a promise made in the coalition agreement.

As the original coalition agreement stated on page 27:

“We will bring forward early legislation to introduce a power of recall, allowing voters to force a by-election where an MP is found to have engaged in serious wrongdoing and having had a petition calling for a by-election signed by 10 per cent of his or her constituents.”

As Zaz Goldsmith has pointed out, this isn’t a truly democratic measure, this is a “cynical stitch-up”.

“True recall is simple. If a percentage of constituents – usually 20 per cent – sign a petition in a given time frame, they earn the right to have a referendum in which voters are asked if they want to recall their MP. If more than half say yes, there is a subsequent by-election.”

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

5 Responses to “The Queen’s Speech: not a recall bill, but a fudge”

  1. Selohesra

    They would never get a bill to recall useless/lazy/corrupt MPs through Parliament – as whichever party in power it is the useless/last/corrupt MPs that hold a majority

  2. Cole

    That shouldn’t stop us trying.

  3. robertcp

    People can get rid of useless/lazy/corrupt MPs every five years. It is called a general election. As it happens, most MPs resign if they go to jail or do something very wrong in any case.

  4. Cole

    Oh no, we can’t possibly have any improvement to the system, or an extension of democracy. We have such a perfect constitution.

    Recall works perfectly adequately in other countries, provided it’s structured properly. But we know the Establishment will fight to the death any real plan to give ordinary people more of a say.

  5. robertcp

    We do not have a perfect system, which is why I favour proportional representation and voted for AV in 2011.

Comments are closed.