Criticise if you will, but Tommy Robinson’s leaving the EDL is a positive move

I first met Tommy yesterday morning and spent most of the day having brief conversations with him as I helped co-ordinate media requests for Quilliam. I believed Tommy when he told me that he is not a racist and does not hate ordinary Muslims.

Tommy Robinson

Ghaffar Hussain is head of outreach and training at counter-extremism think tank Quilliam

Tommy Robinson, the former leader of the English Defence League (EDL), announced his departure from that organisation yesterday and simultaneously upset a lot of people.

Those most upset were not members of the EDL or his previous sympathisers as one may have expected. Rather it was the usual coterie of trendy wine bar types who just weren’t buying it and, somehow, knew better.

This denial was followed up by attempts to expose his recent tweets and currently held positions on a number of issues, with view to convincing the world that he hadn’t changed at all and was still the nasty little Nazi we all knew he was.

Even those with a history of making bigoted statements themselves were quick to point out that he hadn’t moved far enough towards a more enlightened world view.

Such an approach towards the Robinson defection story is both lamentable and, sadly, predictable.

An old Chinese proverb goes ‘A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step’. Tommy’s defection from the EDL, an organisation that he helped form in 2009, represents a first step in a positive direction. His defection was accompanied by regrets, apologies and clarifications, as well as a continued adherence to some positions that many may find unacceptable.

However, this move will take the wind out of the EDL’s sails and, hopefully, signal the start of the end for the thuggish street protests we have all come to associate with the EDL brand.

His defection does not represent an overnight transformation into a new reformed character, nor does it signal the arrival of the English Ghandi. In many respects we are still dealing with the same Tommy, albeit with a wiser head and a better understanding of how to get his message across. To point to unacceptable views or actions as evidence that his defection has no significance is to miss the point completely.

I first met Tommy yesterday morning and spent most of the day having brief conversations with him as I helped co-ordinate media requests for Quilliam. Unless my normally sharp instincts for bigotry, hatred and racism, gained from growing up in a very violent, and often racist, working class community in the Midlands, had completely deserted me, I believed Tommy when he told me that he is not a racist and does not hate ordinary Muslims.

He also told me that he is passionate about fighting extremism in this country and speaking out against it, which it the right of every British citizen.

He maintains the EDL was never meant to be a racist or even an anti-Muslim organisation. In his view, it adopted the wrong tactics and, owing to the lack of tight control and management, got infiltrated by more extremist elements as it developed. This narrative is plausible, except speakers at EDL rallies, such as Gurmit Singh, often did espouse blatantly anti-Muslim views to rapturous applause.

In truth, it began as a mere reaction to taunts and threats directed at our Armed Forces, by Islamist extremists, which culminated in the beheading of Drummer Lee Rigby earlier this year. It was out of control from the start, the line between anti-Muslim and anti-extremist rhetoric was blurred and it soon morphed into a beast that no-one could control or steer in a clear direction.

However, it would not have come into existence at all if there was not a void for it to fill. The sense that nothing is being done about Islamist extremism is all to palatable in many communities up and down this country and many of EDL’s harshest critics have watched the rise of Islamist extremism in this country with complete indifference.

Tommy is clearly a work in progress and, to his credit, he acknowledges that. He has taken a bold step in leaving the EDL and his immediate future is uncertain. What he needs right now to support and guidance so that he can channel his grievances in a more positive and mainstream way.

He also needs to learn to be clear about his message, if it is indeed misunderstood, and work in unison with people of all faith and race backgrounds in order to address hate and prejudice in our society.

In this regard, Quilliam will be working with him in order to provide the guidance and training necessary, but even this arduous and challenging work can be derailed if he is not given the time and space to develop.

Right now, this is the best outcome that could have been expected, given Tommy’s journey thus far. Of course, no one has a crystal ball and it’s not clear what the future holds. However, it has taken a lot of hard work by people who are driven by a strong desire to create a safer and more inclusive Britain to get things this far.

Everyone has a right to criticise and point to faults but armchair critics and keyboard warriors, who wear their politics as a fashion item and claim to speak for a working class they have never met, should not be surprised when they are not taken seriously.

Especially since so many are all too willing to overlook similar faults when dealing with figures from minority communities, who they hold to a lower standard and wish to instrumentalise for parochial and petty political gain.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

14 Responses to “Criticise if you will, but Tommy Robinson’s leaving the EDL is a positive move”

  1. Linda K.

    you really believe that?

  2. Felix

    Appalling and puerile ad hominem attack on critics of Robinson makes the author little better than the extremist himself.

  3. Mark

    I always saw the EDL as a pretty much disorganised bunch of football hooligans. In fact, they went about their ‘business’ almost exactly like football hooligans, with the ‘divisions’ and flags, chanting, and unless I’m misinformed, Robinson’s ‘name’ was taken from an infamous Luton hooligan. Then there was the “we are only against Islamic terrorism,” which was a little annoying given that I’d followed Hitchens, Harris and Dawkins on the same subject for many years in an atmosphere of London terror attacks. The difference settling on “all muslims” or “muslim terrorists”, “Islam” or “Islamism”? Was Robinson telling the truth? Agreeing with him on the radical Islamist problem may have had me in danger of being looked upon as an EDL supporter, nevermind the years of reading intellectuals.

    It seems some simply do not believe him when he says it’s only about millitant Islamism, and no problem with ordinary Muslims. The obvious thing the press focus on is what he said at a rally, where the “All Muslims” rhetoric was used. How do I know which is which? But I’d like to believe it is the radical Islamism side, rather than anything else. Many leftist commentators seem to be 100% the other way on this.

    His resignation was no surprise to me, given that he’s had so much TV and radio time since Woolwich, has made a documentary with new-found media and Muslim organisation pals, and simply can’t now be associated with the regular thuggish, uneducated persona of many of the EDL members. He outgrew them.

    Another confusing thing is how again, leftist writers are suspicious of Quilliam, without actually saying why. Yes, they have ex-Jihadies, but they are reformed aren’t they? If that organisation *is* fighting Islamic extremism, then why do those writers not support? What is it that I’m missing, given that the MI5 chief says the British public are fair game for perhaps 2,000 terrorists. I have never believed their rhetoric that the EDL are more of a danger to this country than the Islamic extremists.

    There is a huge amount of misinformation going on and sometimes it is difficult as to who supports whom, who is against whom and why, and who has a personal egotistical agenda rather than anything else.

    With Robinson, it is hard to see what he does now in terms of helping stop that home-grown terror problem. Perhaps the only effect his resignation will have will be that the EDL can’t now be viewed with any seriousness and will totally crumble and return completely to having football punch ups.

  4. septicisle

    All Robinson has done is apologise for any discomfort or fear caused by the EDL’s many marches, while at the same time making clear that he still believes that Islam should be controlled by the state and immigration halted entirely. It’s not that Quilliam has been naive, it’s the utter cynicism involved in this move, allowing one leader of a movement that had reached a dead end to claim he’s changed, while another group that has floundered also can claim to have achieved something. Watching Robinson on Newsnight last night claiming to have never been racist or to have knowingly allowed those dedicated to whipping up hate would have been laughable had Quilliam not essentially backed up his lies.

Comments are closed.