Climate change is now back in the UK geography curriculum after indications from education chief Michael Gove it would be left out
Adam Dyster is a first year history undergraduate at University College London and a member of the UK Youth Climate Coalition
It’s been introduced in the US curriculum, and threatened to be removed from the parts of the UK’s. It’s an issue that has sparked much debate, and in the UK’s case, outcry from thousands, particularly from young people and schools (to recent success). So why has education sparked such interest and been considered so vital an issue?
Education is vitally important for several, key reasons. It can deliver the scientific facts about the biggest issue facing young people, something that is being felt by millions worldwide. It equips youth with the skills to help combat climate change, and be part of a green recovering, and positive future.
It also encourages young people to be involved as global citizens, and involves and engages them in an issue that’s impacts will be felt most keenly by those now going through the education system.
We have a responsibility to educate, not only bound by international convention, but by moral and ethical duties. Schools must educate young people about the world around them, so that they are informed with facts and key issues.
Education should keep up to date with science and academic thought. Just as the facts and science of stem cell research or alcohol abuse are taught, because of their relevance and strong scientific foundations, so should climate change and sustainability – indeed, even more so, given the magnitude and impact of environmental issues.
Facts not fiction
Such education must be about facts and science, not treated as the political football as it so often is. Such politicisation mires the issue, and means that the urgency and relevancy of climate change education is often lost amidst political point scoring. This should, as with other relevant science-based issues, be an area of consensus, not party political manoeuvring.
Beyond establishing the facts of the issue, education can have be a great force for good, preparing young people to face, and indeed improve, the world after education has long been completed. How can we expect creative solutions and innovation to combat climate and sustainability issues if we don’t educate the next generation about them?
The UK campaign against the removal of climate change from the Geography curriculum is itself proof of the power of education.
Esha Marwaha, at 15-years-old, was able to write so eloquently on the dangers of removing climate change that her petition gained over 30,000 signatures in a matter of weeks. Yet without education, would we get another Esha, or another generation of activists, or even another generation who care about climate change. Without education, those who want or who’re able to combat climate change will surely be in the minority.
This is especially relevant with the need for innovation and sustainable development. Currently the green economy is nascent, its burgeoning growth providing employment and a viable alternative to resource hungry industries and economic models.
But positive growth needs new generations who both understand the need for alternative development and have the passion and desire to act.
Education has a key role in showing young people that not only do they have wider responsibilities, but also that they are entitled to involvement in decisions.
Climate change and sustainability are issues that cut across generations, and the decisions that are made today will have impact not upon the generation that makes them, but generations to come.
Education can help give young people the tools to take part in these decisions, allowing them to enter into the debate.
UN agreements
Finally, there is a legal obligation for many countries to educate about climate change. Under Article 6 of the UN’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, signatories are obliged to: ‘Promote and facilitate …the development and implementation of educational and public awareness programmes on climate change and its effects’.
This article is clear and direct, and must not be ignored.
However in many respects this legal obligation is a lesser consideration when compared to the moral obligation each generation has to educate the next about climate change.
Education is the most powerful tool and can engage young people in the debate, prepare them for working with the green economy, and give the definitive science and facts about the biggest issue facing young people. To quote H.G. Wells: “Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.”
33 Responses to “Education is the key to addressing climate change”
p a t r i c k
Global warming theories are based on observed change over centuries.
Currently there are no respected climate scientists putting forward oppositions to climate change theory in peer reviewed journals.
Climate change denial comes from hugely wealthy groups with a vested interest in undermining the scientific observation.
Climate change denial is a media phenomenon, not a scientific one.
You are just to stupid to see that.
p a t r i c k
This is rubbish.
The climate change phenomenon is observed over centuries. The one thing all climate change predictions have in common is that accuracy is only likely over very lengthy periods of time.
A pause in apparent global warming of 40 years is within the scope of the climate change predictions.
Different elements of the planet can, “take the heat” if you like, for very lengthy periods and thus produce an apparent pause, but the underlying phenomenon continues and climate change scientists have the ability to observe this.
Selohesra
Consensus used to be that the Earth was flat – doesn’t make it so
The apparent consensus is distorted by vested interests and BBC only covering one side of arguement. There is good and bad science on both sides of arguement.
RNRDOCTOR
But this IS just a political game! There is no scientific evidence that global warming is man-made. It is known by the scientific community to be a natural process, we are exiting an ice-age, of course its getting warmer.
The real issues are plastic pollutants and habitat loss/human encroachment, global warming is a deliberate distraction from those important issues.
There won’t be any life left to conserve if we don’t address the real issues soon, instead of following celebrity trends like the global warming ‘debate’!
jfreed27
Wrong