Education is the key to addressing climate change

Climate change is now back in the UK geography curriculum after indications from education chief Michael Gove it would be left out

Adam Dyster is a first year history undergraduate at University College London and a member of the UK Youth Climate Coalition

Climate change is now back in the UK geography curriculum after indications from education chief Michael Gove it would be left out

It’s been introduced in the US curriculum, and threatened to be removed from the parts of the UK’s. It’s an issue that has sparked much debate, and in the UK’s case, outcry from thousands, particularly from young people and schools (to recent success). So why has education sparked such interest and been considered so vital an issue?

Education is vitally important for several, key reasons. It can deliver the scientific facts about the biggest issue facing young people, something that is being felt by millions worldwide. It equips youth with the skills to help combat climate change, and be part of a green recovering, and positive future.

It also encourages young people to be involved as global citizens, and involves and engages them in an issue that’s impacts will be felt most keenly by those now going through the education system.

We have a responsibility to educate, not only bound by international convention, but by moral and ethical duties. Schools must educate young people about the world around them, so that they are informed with facts and key issues.

Education should keep up to date with science and academic thought. Just as the facts and science of stem cell research or alcohol abuse are taught, because of their relevance and strong scientific foundations, so should climate change and sustainability – indeed, even more so, given the magnitude and impact of environmental issues.

Facts not fiction

Such education must be about facts and science, not treated as the political football as it so often is. Such politicisation mires the issue, and means that the urgency and relevancy of climate change education is often lost amidst political point scoring. This should, as with other relevant science-based issues, be an area of consensus, not party political manoeuvring.

Beyond establishing the facts of the issue, education can have be a great force for good, preparing young people to face, and indeed improve, the world after education has long been completed. How can we expect creative solutions and innovation to combat climate and sustainability issues if we don’t educate the next generation about them?

The UK campaign against the removal of climate change from the Geography curriculum is itself proof of the power of education.

Esha Marwaha, at 15-years-old, was able to write so eloquently on the dangers of removing climate change that her petition gained over 30,000 signatures in a matter of weeks. Yet without education, would we get another Esha, or another generation of activists, or even another generation who care about climate change. Without education, those who want or who’re able to combat climate change will surely be in the minority.

New jobs

This is especially relevant with the need for innovation and sustainable development. Currently the green economy is nascent, its burgeoning growth providing employment and a viable alternative to resource hungry industries and economic models.

But positive growth needs new generations who both understand the need for alternative development and have the passion and desire to act.

Education has a key role in showing young people that not only do they have wider responsibilities, but also that they are entitled to involvement in decisions.

Climate change and sustainability are issues that cut across generations, and the decisions that are made today will have impact not upon the generation that makes them, but generations to come.

Education can help give young people the tools to take part in these decisions, allowing them to enter into the debate.

UN agreements

Finally, there is a legal obligation for many countries to educate about climate change. Under Article 6 of the UN’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, signatories are obliged to: ‘Promote and facilitate …the development and implementation of educational and public awareness programmes on climate change and its effects’.

This article is clear and direct, and must not be ignored.

However in many respects this legal obligation is a lesser consideration when compared to the moral obligation each generation has to educate the next about climate change.

Education is the most powerful tool and can engage young people in the debate, prepare them for working with the green economy, and give the definitive science and facts about the biggest issue facing young people. To quote H.G. Wells: “Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.”

33 Responses to “Education is the key to addressing climate change”

  1. OldLb

    So what were the temperatures in the MWP, and what are they now?

    Difficult one that, since in the MWP, temperatures were higher.

    Why have all the IPCC predictions been wrong on the high side?

    Again a difficult one, since its standard science. Theory – predict – test. In the case of AGW, the test of the prediction is a fail. They have over estimated.

    If we take the Met Office. Look at their climate predictions for the UK. They have over predicted the temperatures. Binomial distribution and a coin toss 50-50% chance of being right as the comparison, and the chances they are right, 0.2% They are to put it mildly, crap at the prediction game.

    The reason is quite simple. They have taken money on the basis of AGW. So they have to come out with warmist predictions, or its not good salesmanship. However, theory, predict, test, again a massive scale on more than they typical 5% chances of being wrong. It’s down to 0.2%.

    I take it you’re one of the green entrepreneurs harvesting poor people’s money by forcing them to overpay on the electricity, petrol, holidays, central heating, … A reverse Robin Hood, robbing the poor to fund your life style. Yep, must be.

  2. OldLb

    A pause in apparent global warming of 40 years is within the scope of the climate change predictions.

    ============

    Well, they put in confidence intervals. If the temperature goes outside the confidence intervals, then its falsified. Crude but reasonable accurate. The longer its outside the confidence intevals, its completely falsified.

    Even it its below the prediction most of the time, the prediction is also falsified.

    [To be completely accurate you need the p-value of the differences]

  3. blarg1987

    There was an interesting report written that showed many think tanks that were against global warming theory were heavily funded by the energy markets.
    What would be interesting to know is what reports and think tanks say what and who they are funded by. Best logical guess would be the independent ones will generaly be the most truthful.

  4. OldLb

    And Tim Yeo’s in favour of GW, because he’s receiving money off the back of it. Like Gore. Neither changes the reality.

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-RtYEQbkNvTM/UfQ2v2Z9M_I/AAAAAAAACao/-R0BAWcvLh4/s1600/cmip5-73-models-vs-obs-20n-20s-mt-5-yr-means11.png

    It’s pretty damning evidence when so many variations of the GW theory fail to make a prediction that’s accurate.

Comments are closed.