A minimum wage worker would need to work 380 hours a week to match top earner

A minimum wage worker would need to work for 380 hours a week to match the annual salary of someone at the 99th percentile, according to research by the Resolution Foundation.

A minimum wage worker would need to work for 380 hours a week to match the annual salary of someone at the 99th percentile, according to research by the Resolution Foundation.

An analysis of how the minimum wage compares to the hourly wages received by those higher up the earnings distribution found that

 

Figure 1 above shows the gross hourly wage at different points in the hourly earnings distribution: the National Minimum Wage from October 2012 and the new rate from October 2013, and at the 50th (the median), 70th, 90th and 99th percentiles. The earnings distribution considered here relates to the gross hourly wage received by full-time employees as recorded in the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE). This measure excludes overtime but includes any bonus payments or incentive pay received in the reference pay period. (Resolution Foundation).

A full-time worker halfway up the earnings scale will receive about twice the wage of a minimum wage worker – just under £13. The employee who is situated 70 per cent up the hourly wage distribution would receive an hourly wage around three times greater than the minimum wage – just over £17.

For a worker at the 99th percentile, the disparities are even considerably larger. In 2012 the p99 gross hourly wage was £59.31. According to the Resolution Foundation, someone on this wage working 40 hours a week for 52 weeks per year would take home around £123,365 per year. After October 2012 the minimum wage rose to £6.19 per hour, equivalent to an annual full-time salary of £12,875. Therefore the p99 worker earns almost 10 times as much per hour as a minimum wage worker.

Earlier this week the government announced that the minimum wage would rise to £6.31 from October 2013. This was the fourth straight annual fall in the real value of the minimum wage once inflation is taken into account.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

54 Responses to “A minimum wage worker would need to work 380 hours a week to match top earner”

  1. OldLb

    So lets look at the taxes.

    http://www.listentotaxman.com/index.php for all the numbers

    That 99% worker pays, directly or indirectly, 64,588.15 in tax

    Min wage on 6.31 an hour, 2,131.35 goes on employment taxes

    Min wage on 5.03 an hour, 911.97 goes on employment taxes

    Min wage on 3.72 an hour 5.74 goes on employment taxes

    So, for the wages, the high earner is paying 30 times, 71 times, and 11,252 times the tax as those on min wage.

    When you attack the rich, you fail to realise that they are the ones paying for all the government spending and things you want.

    If you piss them off, forget to say thank you, they (or rather their money), will piss off.

  2. Rayne

    Loving the tax argument in the comment below.
    Because the average person on minimum wage can afford to pay £2000 in tax!! £2000 that could ultimately be used to better effect the economy of the country…

    The 99% worker rarely pays the tax they should, shall we get into the tax dodging scandal or leave it at the fact that poor people are always going to be poor and rich people are always going to sit and piss about poor people being poor.

  3. Rayne

    Loving the tax argument in the comment below.
    Because the average person on minimum wage can afford to pay £2000 in tax!! £2000 that could ultimately be used to better effect the economy of the country…

    The 99% worker rarely pays the tax they should, shall we get into the tax dodging scandal or leave it at the fact that poor people are always going to be poor and rich people are always going to sit and piss about poor people being poor.

  4. Rayne

    Loving the tax argument in the comment below.
    Because the average person on minimum wage can afford to pay £2000 in tax!! £2000 that could ultimately be used to better effect the economy of the country…

    The 99% worker rarely pays the tax they should, shall we get into the tax dodging scandal or leave it at the fact that poor people are always going to be poor and rich people are always going to sit and piss about poor people being poor.

  5. Rayne

    Loving the tax argument in the comment below.
    Because the average person on minimum wage can afford to pay £2000 in tax!! £2000 that could ultimately be used to better effect the economy of the country…

    The 99% worker rarely pays the tax they should, shall we get into the tax dodging scandal or leave it at the fact that poor people are always going to be poor and rich people are always going to sit and piss about poor people being poor.

Comments are closed.