The web of political influence that is fueling climate change

When one third of government ministers have links to either the fossil fuel industry itself or to financial sector firms dependent on high carbon investments, the likelihood of meaningful government regulation of the City’s fossil fuel funding shenanigans look slim.

Alex Scrivener is a policy officer at World Development Movement

The UK financial sector is addicted to carbon. While the world teeters on the edge of irreversible climate change, banks, pension funds and other institutional investors risk subjecting billions of people to increased drought, famine and flooding through their investment activities.

Over the past three years, the top five UK banks helped fossil fuel companies raise £170 billion through bond and share issues. The value of shares in fossil fuel companies on the London Stock Exchange is £900 billion – more than the GDP of sub Saharan Africa.

Long term planning is not typically something big finance does well. So unless they are strictly regulated, investors are unlikely to change their behaviour before it’s too late.

But when one third of government ministers have links to either the fossil fuel industry itself or to financial sector firms dependent on high carbon investments, the likelihood of meaningful government regulation of the City’s fossil fuel funding shenanigans look slim.

A look at the 125 MPs and Lords who make up the government is sobering. Some ministers, including business secretary Vince Cable (ex chief economist at Shell), climate change minister Greg Barker (formerly of Russian oil firm Sibneft) and international development minister Alan Duncan (ex-consultant for Italian oil company Vitol) have worked in fossil fuels directly.

But many more have links to the financial sector which lobbies hard for the continuation of the “light touch” regulation allowing banks and equity funds to get away with irresponsible investment activity.

Take chancellor George Osborne. He is one of the most heavily lobbied people in the government and has met with representatives of big banks like Barclays and representatives of the fossil fuel industry many times since becoming chancellor as well as accepting donations from people like hedge fund tycoon Michael Hintze.

Is it any surprise that it is Osborne who is often cited as a roadblock to green measures?

Foreign secretary William Hague has also hit the headlines for lobbying on behalf of Tullow Oil to help them avoid a £175 million capital gains tax bill in Uganda.

Hague worked at Shell in the 1980s and, like Osborne, also accepted non-cash donations from Hintze, whose firm CQS runs a number of funds focussed on fossil fuel investments.

This web of influence extends far beyond frontbench ministers, though.

Last year, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism revealed that one sixth of members of the House of Lords had paid links to the financial sector; and research by the World Development Movement has revealed that all five big UK banks have people on their boards linked to both fossil fuel industry and government.

In turn, the boards of the top four UK oil and gas companies and the top four mining firms all include former government officials and representatives from the financial sector.

So with fossil fuel interests so intertwined with those of the City, something needs to happen to end the free-for-all on fossil fuel investments.

With global emissions rising and millions of people in developing countries already feeling the effects of climate change, politicians need to wake up to the fact that they’re going to have to rein in their City backers and rediscover the lost art of regulation.

7 Responses to “The web of political influence that is fueling climate change”

  1. brossen99

    What a load of eco-fascist inspired bollocks Global warming due to Co2 is a Corporate-Nazi scam !

  2. mememine

    Some day 27 years of needless CO2 panic will be seen as the war crime that it is.
    You climate blamers enjoy fear mongering our children and your utter determination to believe in this misery is sickeningly comical and oh so obvious.
    “Help my planet could be on fire, maybe”- Science
    You remaining climate change believers all share the same childish urge to highjack stewardship, call it “climate change” and then ultimately use environmentalism as an excuse to hate republicans yet you don’t see how utterly transparent you appear to everyone else and your exaggerations of crisis is painfully obvious. We all see you condemn our children and even your own to your greenhouse gas ovens as and grunt a media headline of “all of science agrees” as you goosestep in Greenzi obedience like fear mongering neocons. You end of the world freaks just hated humanity; you didn’t love the planet and dragging the rest of us down with you in your sick belief of “death” for all is not progressive in the least. You should all be ashamed of yourselves for threatening billions of helpless children with CO2 death warrants in your little tiny catastrophic climate crisis will be counted in history as a war crime akin to witch burning. For now it’s just a laughable yet sickening new Reefer Madness.
    Science didn’t lie; you believers did as not one UN warning says it “will” happen, is imminent or inevitable or eventual, just “maybe” and “could be” ……… If a “maybe” is good enough to condemn your own kids then history will have a special place for you misery lovers, right beside sacrificing virgins to please the angry weather gods.
    Nice work girls, this was your Iraq War.

  3. Newsbot9

    Stray far right American. Happens.

  4. Newsbot9

    Yes, of course you want to prosecute people for believing in science. You keep on trying to redefine science to mean whatever you demand it means. You don’t understand statistics, of course. The problem is that the IPCC are indeed politically influenced…given temperate has constantly tracked the upper bounds of their predictions, they’re underestimating…

  5. Mick

    Left wing idiots run around like headless chickens over ‘climate change’, though they have no idea whether the planet will fry to a crisp or freeze to an ice block. Plus leftists know full well that man-driven ‘climate change’ had its biggest impact during the Industrial Revolution – and even that was a tiny share of the overall natural cycle.

    Bleating by Reds about ‘carbon footprints’ and fossil fuels are just plain laughable. Well, until we receive our new tax bills jammed solid with politically driven hikes. Fossil fuels will run out anyway, not to mention China will never be reined in. It’s about time they took their bleating to the communists.

    Google TELEGRAPH AL GORE’S NINE INCONVENIENT UNTRUTHS to find some truth,m as ruled by the US Supreme Court, to set the Left straight on what they should moan about – their own people blocking nuclear power developments.

  6. Old Holborn

    I love the way left wing idiots believe that “man made global warming” gives them the right to redistribute taxes. What they couldn’t achieve through death camps, slavery and totalitarianism, they believe they can achieve through “coercion” Tough luck guys, we rumbled you. Get your hands out of our pockets.

Leave a Reply