Will Osborne match his support for motorists with a fair fare for rail users?

George Osborne caved in to motorists earlier this year - will he do the same for rail and bus users?

The news rail fares will rise by up to 6.2 per cent shows that if there is a war being waged on any of the travelling public, it is on those using public transport. George Osborne caved in to motorists earlier this year – will he do the same for rail and bus users?

Forthcoming research by IPPR shows rail fares have increased far more quickly than motoring costs in recent years. As the chart below (using data from the Department for Transport) shows, from 1997 to 2010, rail fares rose by 66.2 per cent while all motoring costs rose by just 32.5 per cent – equivalent to a 6.6 per cent fall in real terms.

Bus and coach fares rose by a staggering 76.1 per cent.

Since coming to office the chancellor has done plenty to keep down costs for motorists.

In a new report, due out this month, my colleague Lisa Hopkinson writes:

“In budget 2011 George Osborne proposed three changes to duty rates: an immediate cut in the rate by 1p, abolition of the escalator (replacing with a fair fuel stabiliser), and a delay in the two inflation-driven increases set for April 2011 and April 2012.

These changes [are] estimated to cost around £1.9 billion in 2011/12, or £9.4 billion over 5 years

“In the autumn 2011 statement it was announced the 3.02p per litre increase due to take effect in January would be deferred until August 2012, and the inflation increase planned for 1st August would be cancelled. This cost a further £375 million in 2011-12 or £3.9 billion over 5 years.

“In June 2012 the chancellor announced a further delay in the fuel duty rate rise until 1st January 2013, at a further cost of around £550 million to the Exchequer. This shortfall in government revenue is to be met through greater than forecast savings in departmental spending, with details to be confirmed in the autumn 2012 statement.”


See also:

Budget 2012: The fossil fuel friendly Mr Osborne 27 Mar 2012

Transport poverty is hitting the headlines – it’s time for fair thinking on fuel 29 Feb 2012

Serious concerns over transport commissioning – how will Greening respond? 16 Dec 2011


Labour has said it would introduce a strict cap of one per cent above inflation across all routes, while transport secretary Justine Greening said yesterday he would try to use the autumn statement to see “what we can do to keep rail fares down to something affordable”. Her reputation as the public transport secretary is on the line.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

6 Responses to “Will Osborne match his support for motorists with a fair fare for rail users?”

  1. LB

    So who doesn’t get a look in?

    Ah yes, the mug in Cornwall on min wage, paying 3 grand a year to subsidise the fat cats in the rail industry and commuters in the city to get to work on the cheap.

    Abolish all subsidies. Give the money back to the poor workers slaving to pay it

    The problem then arises that rail transport isn’t economical. It’s too expensive.

  2. Newsbot9

    Ah yes, ensure that the poor mug in cornwall has to pay more than that for transport alone if he gets a job the next county over. Your 3k figure is completely ridiculous as well, of course.

    Every industrialised country subsidises rail travel, because it is an economic good which raises GDP. You, on the other hand, are trying to slash wages by making it uneconomical for people to travel to work at the same time as restricting housing and punishing poor people living in cities. Trying to drive millions out of work and encourage overcrowded immigrant housing again?

  3. newsbot 8

    and stop motorists subsidising trains. 80% of the fuel price is tax! what % of the diesel for trains is tax? 0%. if you want to use a train then is it too much to ask that you pay for it?>

  4. newsbot's mum

    this is so poorly argued it’s hard to know what to say. maybe it’s past your bedtime.

  5. Newsbot9

    Ah yes, idiotic maundering from someone morally bankrupt

Comments are closed.